Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeCapacity exhaustionComponentContainer memory limitSymptomNode NotReadyClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

  1. Symptoms

    At 10:01 UTC on 2024-03-13 a Kubernetes node entered NotReady state, with CPU requests at 78% and memory requests at 82%. An alert fired in Slack at 10:03 and was picked up at 10:05. An attempt to SSH into the node at 10:13 failed because it was unresponsive; it started responding again at 10:19.

    Trigger

    Pods of a dev container that used Hangfire to trigger jobs failed with OOM and crash-looped on a node where a Grafana Agent pod was already using a lot of memory.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A Slack alert fired two minutes after the node went NotReady and was picked up two minutes later; the second node's NotReady at 15:03 also raised a Slack alert.

    Remediation
    • marked the EC2 instance unhealthy so a new node started
    • cordoned and force-drained the NotReady node and terminated its EC2 instance
    • removed the new LimitRange from the Grafana Agent namespace and restarted the Grafana Agent pod
    • scaled the dev container to 0 replicas, after which EC2 network traffic returned to normal
    • after the second NotReady, scaled the dev container to 0 replicas again and added a new node
    • emailed the team that owns the dev container, which confirmed it was working on a fix
    Action items
    • Move grafana-agent to the monitoring node group
    • Add alerts for when bandwidth across the cluster reaches a certain threshold
    • Investigate whether memory limits can be set on the grafana-agent Helm chart
    • Investigate grafana-agent memory usage
    • Ask Grafana support whether grafana-agent should use a PVC
    • Consider pushing node logs to Loki with limited retention
    • Create a wiki page with common metrics and log queries to check when investigating issues with Kubernetes nodes
    Lessons

    Dev workloads mixed with production let one crash-looping dev container take down nodes that production also used, and a monitoring agent outside its dedicated node group added to the memory pressure. Scaling the suspect container back up before its owners had fixed it brought the failure back on the replacement node. The team also noted that action items from earlier post-mortems need follow-up, and that knowledge of useful CloudWatch metrics had not been shared, which made the diagnosis harder.

  2. Symptoms

    At 23:48 CET on 24 January 2024 the Scaleway Kubernetes API for the FR-PAR region ran out of memory. At the same minute Scaleway saw requests to its API Gateway spike.

    Trigger

    Simultaneous deployments in the FR-PAR region pushed the Scaleway Kubernetes API out of memory.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Increased load on the API Gateway was detected at 23:48, the minute the incident began, and the incident was escalated to on-call engineers at 00:00:10.

    Remediation
    • raised the memory limit and garbage collection thresholds of the Kubernetes managed services
    • deployed additional replicas of key services
    • purged the registry cache and monitored the clusters as they stabilised
    • adjusted service configurations after the incident to keep the platform stable
    Action items
    • Implement a local authentication cache
    • Further develop node authentication
    • Enhance monitoring, adjust rate limiting strategies and improve incident response protocols
    Lessons

    Because the Kubernetes API also handled node authentication, its memory exhaustion made some nodes NotReady, and the endless retries of those nodes added load on the API Gateway. Scaleway plans a local authentication cache and further work on node authentication.

  3. Symptoms

    At 14:05 on 25 July 2023, a high-priority PagerDuty alert from Pingdom reported that the "Prometheus - live healthcheck" was DOWN. Prometheus on the live cluster was unavailable, and the Cloud Platform lost its monitoring for a while.

    Trigger

    The growing number of namespaces and Prometheus rules raised Prometheus' memory needs beyond what its node instance size could hold.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A Pingdom health check on Prometheus failed and raised a high-priority PagerDuty alert.

    Remediation
    • drained the monitoring node, moving Prometheus to another monitoring node
    • changed the node instance size to r6i.4xlarge
    • raised the Prometheus memory limit to 100Gi
    • set the Prometheus container limits to 12 CPU cores and 110Gi of memory
    Action items
    • Add an alert on node memory usage and on a pod using up most of a node's memory (issue #4538)
Check your cluster for this

These 3 cases involve Container memory limit and Application database. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1