Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentContainer memory limitSymptomHigh latencyClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

  1. Symptoms

    The day began with an alert that several instances of the Redis cluster were running out of disk space. That part was fixed quickly. The outage came an hour later: right after the Redis StatefulSet was deleted and recreated at 8:10 UTC, Kubernetes restarted every Redis pod within about five minutes, and problems started to appear.

    Trigger

    To make Git match the volumes that had been resized by hand, the Redis StatefulSet was deleted with orphan (non-cascading) deletion and recreated with the new storage template; Kubernetes reconciled the new spec by restarting the entire Redis cluster.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    An alert about Redis instances running out of disk space started the work; the outage itself showed up as backend errors about Redis connections right after the StatefulSet was recreated.

    Remediation
    • made the Redis masters forget obsolete node identities, reset the affected replicas and rejoined them, then waited for replication to catch up
    • identified the component that was actually running out of memory, scaled the backend service and raised memory limits for that component
    • temporarily relaxed probes so backend instances took traffic immediately instead of flapping between ready and not ready
    • reverted the temporary workarounds at 10:00 UTC
    Action items
    • Add startup probes so a Redis pod is not marked ready until its dataset is loaded
    • Build an own control plane for Redis that handles restarted pods stuck to an old master address
    • Reduce dependence on the single Redis cluster: move some important data to other stores, such as a separate Redis cluster per server, and use Kafka for some backend components
    Lessons

    The disk resize was not the problem; the cleanup afterwards was. An immutable field pushes operators toward deleting and recreating the controller, and that can set off a full reconcile. Startup and readiness probes are what slow a rolling restart down to a safe pace; without them a distributed store restarts in the most fragile way. Recovery plans must expect a cluster to heal slowly, and dependent services need to degrade gracefully while it does.

  2. Symptoms

    Services on the production Amazon EKS cluster behind the idus marketplace threw intermittent errors whose cause was hard to pin down. Calls to external services such as RDS and Redis failed now and then, and whenever DNS traffic spiked, domain lookups answered slowly or failed outright.

    Trigger

    All CoreDNS pods were scheduled onto the same node, and that node's memory usage spiked until it ran out of memory.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The write-up does not say how the full outage was noticed. The earlier DNS trouble showed up as intermittent service errors, and investigating failed calls to RDS and Redis led to DNS resolution failures.

    Remediation
    • deployed NodeLocal DNSCache as a DaemonSet in front of CoreDNS
    • added a PodDisruptionBudget (maxUnavailable 1) and topologySpreadConstraints across zones for CoreDNS
    • lowered ndots from 5 to 2 with dnsConfig in the Deployments
    Lessons

    The CoreDNS setup that EKS creates by default (two pods) can be enough for a small or development cluster but becomes a bottleneck in a large production cluster, and DNS is a single point of failure that needs high availability and room to scale. Tuning the CoreDNS cache and buffer size only relieved the symptoms; the real load came from the extra queries that ndots:5 generates for external names. A CoreDNS pod without a memory limit can share a node's fate with everything else on it.

  3. Symptoms

    On 2022-04-25 the Sidekiq Apdex (the share of background jobs that finish within a target time) dropped, and an engineer declared an incident in Slack at 15:13 UTC. Users saw intermittent slowness across GitLab.com, and asynchronous work such as pipeline creation and import and export took unusually long.

    Trigger

    The Consul agent in GitLab.com's GKE pods had memory demand spikes that did not fit in the pods' 500MB memory limit, and the agent was killed again and again.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    –
    Detection

    An engineer declared the incident in Slack at 15:13 UTC after the Sidekiq Apdex dropped; the second event was found when monitoring detected an elevated error rate at 01:21 UTC on 2022-04-26.

    Remediation
    • planned at 16:13 to raise the per-user connection limit for the gitlab database user and the pgbouncer backend pools for the main database; changes were applied at 17:26 and confirmed at 17:47
    • raised the pod memory limits from 500MB to 1GB so the Consul agents survive memory spikes
    Action items
    • Monitor the Consul agents on GKE pods to see whether the 1GB memory limit keeps them healthy
    • Investigate the Consul memory demand spikes and what can be done beyond raising the hard memory limit
    Lessons

    When the local Consul agent that Rails uses for database service discovery keeps dying, Rails does not fail; it sends every query to the last known primary. What engineers saw was database saturation and slow background jobs, which pointed the investigation first at a recent pgbouncer pool change. The memory limit of the Consul agent in every pod therefore decided the load on the primary database.

  4. Symptoms

    The NU.nl development team got reports that several services on one of its Kubernetes clusters behaved erratically: occasional error pages, slow responses and timeouts. The affected services were mostly internal tools and dashboards.

    Trigger

    A new ElastAlert rule, deployed shortly before from the command line, that fired if the Cloudfront-* Elasticsearch indexes stopped receiving documents; those indexes take a few million requests per hour, and the rule made ElastAlert's memory grow without bound.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Users reported error pages, slow responses and timeouts from several services; no alert fired.

    Remediation
    • terminated the NotReady nodes one by one so the auto-scaling group replaced them (the new nodes also went NotReady, but Prometheus and Grafana landed on a stable node)
    • found the ElastAlert pods' memory growth on the Grafana pod memory dashboard
    • fixed the ElastAlert problem that caused the memory growth
    Action items
    • Define alerts on resource usage such as CPU, memory and disk space
    • Keep researching an alerting strategy that combines Elasticsearch, Prometheus Alertmanager and New Relic
    • Consider exporting metrics out of the cluster and running Grafana outside it, on EC2 or a separate Kubernetes cluster
    • Either visualise the important metrics in the ELK stack or make Prometheus and Grafana more available, and improve the metrics strategy
    • Set resource limits for ElastAlert through the Helm values
    • Configure namespaces with default memory requests and limits
    • Isolate customer-facing workloads from build, logging and monitoring workloads (a dedicated node group, or later a separate tools cluster)
    • Deploy everything through automation such as Jenkins pipelines, and consider a GitOps approach
    • Deploy through a pipeline that includes a smoke test step
    • Make Kubernetes and cloud infrastructure work part of the team's sprints, picked up by all team members while pairing with more experienced members, and hold workshops that go deep into specific topics
    Lessons

    Fixing the root cause covers only a small part of what an incident can teach; the chain of smaller failures around it is where most of the learning is. A pod without a memory limit can take whole nodes down, so limits need defaults at the namespace level. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster it watches goes blind with it. Changes installed by hand from the command line leave the rest of the team without a record of what changed.

Check your cluster for this

These 4 cases involve Container memory limit and kubelet. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2