Cases5 cases

1 to 5 of 5

1. IL-0410 SQS Fair Queues rejected valid messages with InvalidParameterValue, failing about half of AssemblyAI's US async requests

   AssemblyAI2026

   Symptoms

   From 20:04 UTC on 16 September 2026 AssemblyAI's US Async API returned elevated server errors. At the peak roughly 50% of async transcription requests on the US endpoint failed, and part of the requests that succeeded took longer than usual to complete.

   High error rateHigh latency

   Trigger

   The AWS SQS Fair Queues feature began rejecting valid messages with InvalidParameterValue because of a change on the AWS side; AWS confirmed a service-side issue.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Message broker

   Contributing factor

   –

   Remediation

   • Disabled Fair Queues across all services and reverted to standard SQS queues

   Action items

   • Move service configuration from environment variables to a global feature flag system so mitigations apply in seconds
   • Add a reviewed break-glass path that lets urgent fixes skip non-essential CI steps
   • Fail the US pipeline over to a second region when a regional provider dependency degrades

   View case
2. IL-0214 PagerDuty's Kafka brokers ran out of JVM heap one after another, and the event APIs rejected events with 502 responses

   PagerDuty2025

   Symptoms

   When a Kafka cluster of PagerDuty's US Service Regions began failing at 03:53 UTC on 28 August 2025, the first alerts pointed to one failing broker. More brokers then ran out of memory, and PagerDuty's event APIs began rejecting incoming events with a response status code of 502 while notifications, webhooks, chat integrations and the REST API degraded.

   Memory pressureHigh error rateThroughput degradation

   Trigger

   A new feature that recorded API key usage in a Kafka topic was being rolled out by configuration: 1% on 21 August, 5% and then 25% on 27 August, and 75% on 28 August. A logical error in the feature created a new Kafka producer for every API request instead of reusing one producer.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Message broker

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotSignal buried in noiseChange with a delayed effectExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Alerts pointed to one failing Kafka broker at the start of the first incident, and alerts fired again at 16:38 UTC when Kafka performance degraded for the second time. Critical alerts about core API errors were buried among webhook pages.

   Remediation

   • Expanded the Kafka cluster and removed the first failing broker
   • Doubled the Kafka broker heap size and applied it with a rolling restart across the cluster
   • Added status page updates by hand through backup procedures when automated publishing failed
   • Recovered Kafka-dependent services, some by manual intervention, and backfilled lost data with scripts
   • In the second incident, doubled the heap again with another rolling restart
   • Rolled back the API usage feature with a pull request that stopped it from publishing Kafka messages

   Action items

   • Remove the dependency that blocked status page automation and simplify and republish the manual runbook
   • Run live drills regularly so status updates go out even when parts of the platform are degraded
   • Expand JVM and Kafka monitoring of heap, garbage collection and producer and consumer health
   • Strengthen service dependency mapping so cascading failures are easier to trace
   • Collect customer impact metrics into incident workflows automatically
   • Add stricter change management guardrails, with readiness checklists and slower ramp-up windows for major rollouts
   • Improve recovery mechanisms in the streaming systems
   • Automate communication workflows such as status page updates, internal and external syncs and reminders
   • Test major incident workflows monthly with chaos engineering, such as status page failover
   • Define clearer incident severity levels and roles, including dedicated communications liaisons

   Lessons

   PagerDuty found its message processing more intricate than it had thought: some services had to be restarted to pick up changes, some API activity produced far more messages than expected, and it was hard to tell which parts of the system put heavy load on Kafka. Because producers and JVM heap were barely observed, responders could not see the first failure until several downstream systems were affected, and no one on the call held a model of the whole system. Enabling the feature through configuration rather than a separate deployment was meant as a safety step but made the outage harder to link to the change. Runbooks and backfill scripts were imperfect but gave responders a head start, and the second incident was mitigated in about 50 minutes by repeating the first incident's steps.

   View case
3. IL-0535 An internal Kinesis Data Streams cell in US-EAST-1 degraded, raising errors in CloudWatch Logs, S3 events and Lambda

   Amazon Web Services2024

   Symptoms

   From 2:45 PM PDT on July 30th, 2024, several AWS services in the Northern Virginia (US-EAST-1) Region had higher latency and error rates: CloudWatch Logs, Amazon Data Firehose, the event framework that publishes Amazon S3 events, Amazon ECS, AWS Lambda, Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue. All of them used one internal cell of Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, whose requests had started to see elevated latency and errors.

   High latencyHigh error rateMonitoring outageProbe failures

   Trigger

   At 9:09 AM PDT on July 30th a routine deployment started in one Availability Zone of the Kinesis cell, and taking hosts in and out of service during the deployment set off the failure.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Message brokerServerless function platformObject storage

   Contributing factor

   Unrepresentative stagingAutomation amplification

   Remediation

   • Deployed a change that shed load by reducing incoming stream volume from less time-sensitive internal workloads
   • Added capacity to the subsystem that provisions secure connections for Kinesis requests
   • Added more capacity at 6:32 PM PDT to further improve connection provisioning

   Action items

   • Keep the added connection provisioning capacity, load-shedding tooling and changed connection limits in place in US-EAST-1
   • Apply the same changes in every other region that has cells with the new Kinesis Data Streams architecture
   • Update the cell management system to better manage the workload that triggered the issue

   View case
4. IL-0384 Amazon Kinesis front-end servers in US-EAST-1 could not route requests, so Kinesis and services built on it failed

   Amazon Web Services2020

   Symptoms

   At 5:15 AM PST on 25 November 2020, alarms fired for errors on putting and getting Amazon Kinesis records in the Northern Virginia (US-EAST-1) Region. From the same time CloudWatch, which processes metric and log data through Kinesis Data Streams, and CloudWatch Events and EventBridge returned more errors.

   High error rateHigh latencyMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   A relatively small addition of capacity to the Kinesis front-end fleet, made between 2:44 AM and 3:47 AM PST.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Message brokerServerless function platformTelemetry agent

   Contributing factor

   Unknown limitExcessive blast radiusCircular dependency

   Detection

   Alarms for errors on putting and getting Kinesis records fired at 5:15 AM PST, and the teams began reviewing logs.

   Remediation

   • Removed the newly added front-end capacity
   • Added a configuration so front-end servers load bootstrap data from the authoritative metadata store instead of neighbouring servers
   • Restarted the front-end fleet gradually, a few hundred servers per hour from 10:07 AM PST
   • Added Cognito capacity to buffer more calls to Kinesis
   • Deployed a change that reduced Cognito's dependency on Kinesis
   • Mitigated the memory contention on the Lambda invocation hosts
   • Informed customers through the backup Service Health Dashboard tool, the Personal Health Dashboard and a global banner

   Action items

   • Move the Kinesis front-end to larger CPU and memory servers so fewer servers, and fewer threads per server, are needed
   • Add fine-grained alarming for thread consumption
   • Finish testing a higher operating system thread count limit
   • Greatly improve the cold-start time of the front-end fleet
   • Move the front-end server cache to a dedicated fleet
   • Move a few large AWS services such as CloudWatch to a separate, partitioned front-end fleet
   • Accelerate the cellularization of the front-end fleet to match the back-end
   • Change the Cognito webservers so they sustain Kinesis API errors without exhausting their buffers
   • Keep 3 hours of metric data in the CloudWatch local metrics data store, first in US-EAST-1 and then globally
   • Train support engineers regularly on the backup tool for posting to the Service Health Dashboard

   Lessons

   In the Kinesis front-end, the number of threads each server keeps grows directly with the number of servers in the fleet, so adding servers can push every server past an operating system limit at the same time. AWS sees cellularization of the front-end, already done for the back-end, as the way to keep the shard-map cache within a tested and operated range and to guard against unknown scaling limits.

   View case
5. IL-0588 AppOptics metrics APIs returned 5xx as Kafka partitions stayed leaderless after an AWS power event hit their ZooKeeper

   AppOptics2018

   Symptoms

   On May 31, 2018 from 21:53 UTC the metrics APIs of AppOptics and Librato returned a 5xx for a majority of incoming metric data. APM metrics and traces sent from AppOptics APM were affected, and many alert notifications were delayed.

   High error rateFailover failureMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   A power event in one of AWS's availability zones in us-east-1 cut off nodes in several critical parts of the AppOptics and Librato infrastructure, including the ZooKeeper node that was then the leader of the ensemble coordinating the Kafka brokers.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Message brokerCoordination and key-value store

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureExcessive blast radiusMonitoring blind spot

   Remediation

   • Restarted one ZooKeeper node by hand to force a leader election, after which the ensemble regained quorum
   • Restarted every Kafka broker in a rolling restart until all partitions were back online
   • Worked through the backlog, including the backlog of alerts, and resumed normal operations

   Action items

   • Isolate the Kafka clusters better across availability zones and regions
   • Stop sharing one ZooKeeper ensemble across Kafka clusters
   • Run game days on this failure and check whether newer Kafka versions fix it
   • Put in place more checks that notify the team earlier about subsystems that need extra help to recover

   Lessons

   Running services across several availability zones and more than one Kafka cluster did not isolate the pipeline from the failure of one zone, because partitions of different clusters sat in the same zones and the clusters shared one ZooKeeper ensemble. More operational monitoring of the subsystems that needed help to recover would have led to a faster recovery.

   View case

By root cause4