Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentNode poolSymptomPods stuck in ContainerCreatingDomainKubernetesClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

  1. Symptoms

    At 13:42 the RootVolUtilisation-Critical alert fired in the high-priority alerts channel. At 14:03 a user reported image pull errors with the message "no space left on device".

    Trigger

    Upgrading the EKS Terraform module to version 18, which changed the node launch template, and draining workloads onto the new nodes it created.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The RootVolUtilisation-Critical alert fired in the high-priority alerts channel at 13:42, and a user reported "no space left on device" image pull errors at 14:03.

    Remediation
    • Uncordoned the old default node group and drained the new nodes to move workloads back
    • Identified the launch template change that cut the root volume to 20 GB and applied a fix on the manager and live clusters
    • Drained the old node group onto the fixed nodes
    Action items
    • Update the runbook to compare launch template changes during an EKS module upgrade
    • Create a test setup that pulls images of different sizes, like live
    • Update the RootVolUtilisation alert runbook to check the disk space configuration
    • Scale CoreDNS dynamically based on the number of nodes
    • Investigate whether IPv6 can solve the IP prefix starvation problem
    • Add drift testing to identify when a terraform plan shows a change to the launch template
    • Set up logging for the CNI and ipamd logs and alerts on errors related to IP prefix starvation
    Lessons

    The write-up lists review actions rather than lessons. They aim at two gaps: the launch template changes brought by a module upgrade were not compared or drift-tested before rollout, and there were no CNI or ipamd logs or alerts to show the IP prefix starvation the team suspected during the drain.

  2. Symptoms

    At 08:15 a user posted in the #ask-cloud-platform channel that new deployments were not starting: their pods stayed in ContainerCreating.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A user reported new deployments stuck in ContainerCreating in the #ask-cloud-platform channel at 08:15; the incident was declared at 09:31.

    Remediation
    • Added new nodes and cordoned and drained the six affected nodes
    • Enabled prefix delegation in the VPC CNI on the live cluster after comparing its CNI settings with a 1.23 test cluster
    Action items
    • Add a test or check that confirms IP address allocation is working as expected (#4669)
    Lessons

    The write-up states no lessons beyond its review action, which is to add a check that IP address allocation works.

  3. Symptoms

    From 18:02 UTC on 2 June 2021, the Jenkins infrastructure AKS cluster logged errors about pods that were unable to mount volumes and about scaled-up nodes that were unable to obtain a network virtual interface from the CNI.

    Trigger

    The Azure Service Principal credential of the AKS cluster expired at 17:53 UTC on 2 June 2021.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The error behind the failures was found in the AKS UI console while the team investigated the root cause of the LTS 2.289.1 release problem.

    Remediation
    • Renewed the AKS cluster's Azure Service Principal credential, which made AKS restart all nodes automatically
    Action items
    • Add an automatic PagerDuty check that alerts a week before the service principal expires, as is done for certificates
    • Keep a team-level calendar for manual operations such as resetting a credential
    • Consider managed identities, which renew automatically, instead of the service principal
  4. Symptoms

    On 13 March 2018 at 07:28 CET the mybinder.org team noticed that JupyterHub had not been spawning new users and that the launch success rate on the Grafana dashboard had been at zero for several hours. Many pods were in the states "Unknown" and "NodeLost", on at least the nodes `10.128.0.7` and `10.128.0.5`.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The team noticed only after several hours, when the launch success rate on the Grafana dashboard had been at zero for a long time. No Stackdriver alert email arrived in time, because those emails were marked as spam and reached the team hours later.

    Remediation
    • Cordoned the bad nodes
    • Deleted the hub pod in Unknown state and the hub pod stuck in ContainerCreating
    • Reset node gke-prod-a-ssd-pool-32-134a959a-n2sk from the GCP web interface to force the PVC to be released
    • Force-deleted every pod in Unknown or NodeLost state with kubectl delete --grace-period=0 --force
    Action items
    • Investigate why the outage started, through Stackdriver logs and Google Cloud incidents
    • Set up an alerting service that does not depend on Stackdriver
    • Document how to check whether a PVC has not been released
    • Document how to restart a node by hand when commands are not working
    • Document how to delete pods that are in Unknown state
    Lessons

    The error went unnoticed for a long time because Stackdriver alert emails were marked as spam and arrived hours late. Once the problem was found, each step was logged and the steps were made more forceful as needed, so the hub was down only briefly after detection.

Check your cluster for this

These 4 cases involve Node pool and Persistent volumes and stateful sets. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause3