Graph
Cases4 cases
1 to 4 of 4
IL-0102CoreDNS pods on a production EKS cluster ran out of memory under a burst of new pods, endpoints and nodes, taking down the Buildkite web UI, APIs and job dispatchBuildkite2026- Symptoms
From 22:47 UTC on 25 August 2026 the Buildkite web interface, REST API, Agent API, job queue and notifications stopped working for every customer. No one could create a build from the UI or the REST API, job dispatch was delayed, and some builds that were already running when the outage began stayed stuck until the services recovered.
- Trigger
At 22:44 UTC an application deploy created a surge of new pods, which used up the free capacity on the existing nodes and made the EKS cluster scale out. Background worker pools with unusually high maximum replica counts were scaling out at the same time and kept asking for more pods while new nodes were still being provisioned. Together they produced an unusually high rate of change in applications, network endpoints and nodes, and with it a sudden rise in demand on CoreDNS.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
The first status post, at 22:55 UTC, eight minutes after the outage began, said something had gone wrong, and at 23:05 UTC the status page said a sitewide outage was being investigated. CoreDNS query duration had been rising as the cluster grew, but a defect in a key monitoring query and too little monitoring of query volume meant this went unnoticed before the outage.
- Remediation
- paused further application deploys
- scaled CoreDNS from three to twelve pods
- raised each CoreDNS pod's memory limit from 512 MiB to 2 GiB
- expanded the system node pool that runs CoreDNS
- Action items
- Increase immediate CoreDNS headroom: twelve pods instead of three, a 2 GiB memory limit instead of 512 MiB, and a larger system node pool
- Enable EKS-managed CoreDNS autoscaling with a tested minimum replica count and enough capacity to spread the replicas across nodes and availability zones
- Add direct alerts on CoreDNS query duration, query volume, goroutine growth, memory pressure, OOM restarts and available replicas, and track longer-term trends in capacity planning
- Find other cluster-critical services that lack tested capacity, direct alerting, spread across failure domains, and either safe autoscaling or documented static headroom, and fix them
- Lessons
A CoreDNS deployment sized once and left at a fixed size can carry a growing cluster for months and then fail on the first burst of churn it cannot absorb. When query processing slows, pending queries take up memory, the pods hit their limits and restart, and client retries keep the service down after the restart. Server-side DNS query duration and volume need their own alerts: here client-side latency was masked by unrelated application speed-ups, and a broken monitoring query hid the server-side trend. Maximum replica counts raised as a temporary measure remove the cap that normally stops runaway scaling when new nodes are slow to arrive.
IL-0070Critical pods on core nodes evicted when Prometheus began scraping about 200 nodes after a dask-gateway scale-up2i2c2023- Symptoms
The hub pod of the prod JupyterHub on the leap cluster (leap.2i2c.org) restarted unexpectedly during a large node scale-up, and a user opened a support ticket. The ingress-nginx and proxy pods kept running.
- Trigger
A user's dask-gateway workload added about 100 dask-worker nodes within a minute, and Prometheus started scraping the metrics exporters on about 200 nodes.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
A user support ticket (2i2c Freshdesk ticket 414) about the leap hub; the engineer then looked at Grafana and the cluster's nodes and events.
- Action items
- Configure CPU and memory requests for the hub and proxy pods (#2127; at least 100m CPU was proposed)
- Make the Grafana OOMKiller dashboard work (#2213)
- Move LEAP cloud infrastructure to shared nodes (#2209)
- Update resource requests and limits, mainly for ingress-nginx and Prometheus (#2324)
- Decide whether Prometheus should scrape dask worker pods (#2366)
- Lessons
Prometheus load grows with the number of nodes, so a burst of autoscaled nodes can push a nearly full core node over the edge and evict the pods that matter most. Core pods that request 10m of CPU get a tenth of the CPU share of busy neighbours that request 100m. Kubernetes events expire after an hour, so evidence of OOM kills needs a dashboard that keeps it.
IL-0205The GKE cluster autoscaler could not add nodes to GitLab.com's production cluster because Google Cloud ran out of SSD persistent disks in us-east1GitLab2021- Symptoms
At 08:05 UTC on 2021-06-21 the API service's Apdex (the share of requests that finish within a target time) and Rails request queuing began trending the wrong way. At 09:01 the team found the API deployment unhealthy: it needed more pods for the day's growing traffic, but no new nodes could be added to give it pod capacity. Users saw slow responses; the review found no sign that error rates rose.
- Trigger
Google Cloud ran out of SSD persistent disk stock in us-east1, the region GitLab.com runs in, while the API service needed more nodes for rising user traffic.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
There was no alert on resource availability. Apdex and Rails queuing began trending the wrong way at 08:05 UTC and an engineer declared the incident in Slack at 08:43; finding the cause took a lot of log digging: cluster autoscaler errors about node pools in backoff, then ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED at the instance-group level, and finally Google Cloud support naming SSD as the exhausted resource.
- Remediation
- added a node pool that uses pd-standard disks
- scaled the new node pool by hand across all three zones to relieve the API
- brought more pd-standard node pools online for the other blocked workloads
- stopped production deployments and opened a Google Cloud support case about the cluster autoscaler not working with the new node pools
- changed node pools and nodeSelectors so the remaining workloads ran on pd-standard nodes
- removed the SSD-backed node pools after a day without problems
- Action items
- Move Kubernetes services to pd-standard disks (delivery#1837)
- Capture resource exhaustion errors as a metric
- Lessons
A cloud region can run out of one specific resource, here SSD persistent disks, and the only error may be a generic ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED that does not name it. GitLab could neither monitor nor reserve resource availability, so detection took 22 hours and the cause came from Google Cloud support. The workloads ran fine on pd-standard disks. A second problem found on the way, a cluster autoscaler that does not fall back to another matching node pool when one cannot scale, slowed the move to the new node pools.
IL-0039New Kubernetes worker nodes could not join any cluster because a package URL hardcoded in kops nodeup brokeFREE NOW2019- Symptoms
At 16:00 CEST a developer reported in the #ask-platform Slack channel that a deployment to the Prelive cluster was failing, and a second report followed at 16:06.
- Trigger
Roughly two to three days earlier, the CentOS repository mirror was restructured and container-selinux-2.68-1.el7.noarch.rpm moved, which made the static download URL hardcoded in kops nodeup invalid.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Developers asked for help in the #ask-platform Slack channel because their deployments were failing.
- Remediation
- downloaded the package by hand on the Prelive nodes so their bootstrap could finish
- changed the cluster AMI from Amazon Linux 2 to Debian and applied it to all clusters
- Action items
- Create an alert that shows when nodes cannot join the cluster, possibly from information the cluster autoscaler already has
- Document the external dependencies of node startup and look for ways to reduce them
- Change the AMI back to Amazon Linux 2 Minimal once kops fixes the issue
- Document node troubleshooting better: what happens during bootstrap and where the logs are
- Lessons
Applying cluster changes through kops and Jenkins worked well, and troubleshooting quickly showed that the failing deployments came from missing cluster capacity. What went wrong was that nobody noticed, over a long period, that some autoscaling groups held more worker instances than Kubernetes had nodes. The team was lucky that no large number of production spot instances was terminated during the problem and that it was noticed during office hours.
These 4 cases involve Node pool and Cluster autoscaler. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause3
Capacity exhaustion2 cases
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
IL-0102CoreDNS pods on a production EKS cluster ran out of memory under a burst of new pods, endpoints and nodes, taking down the Buildkite web UI, APIs and job dispatchBuildkite2026IL-0070Critical pods on core nodes evicted when Prometheus began scraping about 200 nodes after a dask-gateway scale-up2i2c2023
Cloud provider outage1 case
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
Dependency failure1 case
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Organisation