Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentPod scheduling and placementFactorUnverified assumptionOrganisationMoonlightClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases1 case

1 to 1 of 1

  1. Symptoms

    On Friday, January 18, Moonlight's API began returning occasional errors that looked like connection problems with its Redis database. The API checks Redis on every authenticated request to validate the session. At the same time the Kubernetes monitoring reported some nodes and pods as unresponsive.

    Trigger

    The Kubernetes scheduler put several CPU-heavy pods on the same node, including all three replicas of the website and the server-side rendering pods.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    API errors that looked like Redis connectivity problems, and Kubernetes monitoring that showed nodes and pods as unresponsive. Google Cloud Support later found the link between sustained 100% CPU and kernel panics.

    Remediation
    • added anti-affinity rules to all major deployments so their pods spread across nodes
    Action items
    • Keep working with Google Cloud support to find and fix the cause of the node kernel panics
    Lessons

    Three replicas give no fault tolerance if the scheduler places them all on one node; anti-affinity rules make the spread explicit. A node failure that comes from the workload itself moves with the workload when the scheduler reschedules it.

Check your cluster for this

This case involves Application database and Linux kernel. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1