Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentPod scheduling and placementSymptomIntermittent timeoutsFactorMonitoring blind spotClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases1 case

1 to 1 of 1

  1. Symptoms

    From the evening of 27 September 2026 (UTC), InfluxDB Cloud customers in Azure West Europe saw slow queries and query timeouts, and a query queue depth alert fired at 22:58 UTC. Writes were accepted the whole time, but new data on some partitions could not be queried right away.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A query queue depth alert fired at 22:58 UTC on 27 September and an incident was opened.

    Remediation
    • Doubled query-layer capacity
    • Restarted stuck storage pods one at a time
    • Raised the readiness probe timeout and rolled it out fleet-wide
    • Doubled recovery concurrency after a restart
    • Raised the cleanup timeout to 24 hours, which stopped the forced restarts
    • Raised each storage pod's resource request so each host held fewer pods, doubling page cache memory and disk throughput per pod
    Action items
    • Add warning alerts for page-fault rate, cache coverage, disk reads on storage volumes and query abandonment
    • List major page faults in the runbooks as a leading indicator of storage performance degradation, with the relief valves that can be tuned
    • Keep tracking down the storage-engine reference leak
    • Move the disk check out of the health path
    Lessons

    Because the storage process uses little memory and the page cache takes what is left, a page cache too small for the data being queried does not show up as memory pressure on the usual memory metrics. InfluxData now treats major page faults as a leading indicator of storage performance degradation and alerts on cache pressure before customers see it.

Check your cluster for this

This case involves Database and Database replication. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1