Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomProbe failuresFactorAutomation amplificationDomainKubernetesClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    While the Spring Cloud Config Server was briefly down for an upgrade, every client application began to answer its liveness probe with a failure saying it could not reach the config server.

    Trigger

    A downtime upgrade of the Spring Cloud Config Server made it stop responding for a short time.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Lessons

    A liveness probe that includes an external dependency turns a short outage of that dependency into a restart loop of every client. Keep external dependencies out of liveness checks and handle temporary problems with readiness probes. Libraries can add health indicators to Spring Boot's actuator health endpoint automatically, so check what the probe path actually reports. The author ran another Kubernetes environment for two years without liveness probes, relying on strict readiness probes and on the application terminating itself on unrecoverable faults.

  2. Symptoms

    Between 14:20 and 15:16 UTC on 27 August 2024, some HubSpot customers could not log in to their accounts, reach their content or use HubSpot tools. Requests were slow or failed because HubSpot's internal load balancers, which run on Kubernetes and spread traffic across the backend services, were overloaded.

    Trigger

    Routine operation of a critical component of HubSpot's traffic management system, from about 14:08 UTC, ran path handling updates in the load balancer stack, and an issue in that stack made those updates block health check responses.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Monitoring detected widespread performance degradation across the platform at 14:23 UTC and the incident response team was mobilised. HubSpot says it had identified the issue internally by 14:20 UTC. The status page was not updated until 14:44 UTC, which left customers with outdated information.

    Remediation
    • Tried to increase the capacity of the remaining load balancer instances
    • Brought new load balancer instances online, which relieved the pressure and let traffic return to normal
    Action items
    • Change the health check configuration so health checks do not time out falsely
    • Redesign the health check system so health checks get priority and keep running during operations such as configuration updates
    • Increase the capacity of the load balancers for sudden traffic spikes
    • Change the load balancing architecture to detect traffic surges earlier and distribute load dynamically in real time
    • Update the status page automatically for large-scale outages
    • Integrate the monitoring systems more tightly with the communication tools
    • Expand load testing to simulate high-traffic scenarios
    • Introduce chaos engineering to test platform resilience regularly
    • Add traffic pattern metrics, including the ratio of current connections to the maximum allowed
    • Add auto-scaling that adjusts resource capacity to traffic patterns
    Lessons

    HubSpot concluded that earlier detection of the abnormal traffic surge could have prevented the cascading failure, and that health checks have to keep running during operations such as configuration updates so that working load balancers are not removed together. The late status page update caused confusion for customers.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Liveness and readiness probes and Ingress controller. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2