Cases5 cases

1 to 5 of 5

1. IL-0581 29CM product display servers lost pods and saturated Netty event loops on the first day of the Igu Week sale

   MUSINSA2025

   Symptoms

   Shortly after 29CM's Igu Week sale began on 3 November 2025, the servers for the display domain, which serve search results and product listings, showed anomalies. Some pods went down and stopped taking traffic, and the remaining pods received more traffic than they could handle and saturated their Netty event loops.

   Probe failuresIntermittent connection failuresHigh latency

   Trigger

   Igu Week, 29CM's largest Black Friday sale and its busiest traffic of the year, raised Redis network traffic to about four times normal.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   In-memory cacheLiveness and readiness probes

   Contributing factor

   Unknown limitMonitoring blind spotHealth check tied to a dependency

   Detection

   Anomalies on the display servers, pods going down and Netty event loops saturating, were the first sign. The Redis cause was found from Redis health check failure logs and then the Redis network metrics.

   Remediation

   • Scaled the Redis nodes up from cache.r7g.large to cache.r7g.2xlarge, about twice the baseline network bandwidth

   Action items

   • Extended the monitoring dashboard to show in real time whether network in and out bandwidth exceeds the baseline, with metrics such as aws.elasticache.network_bandwidth_out_allowance_exceeded and aws.elasticache.traffic_management_active
   • Added Datadog alerts that fire when network bandwidth crosses a threshold
   • Added a Caffeine local cache in front of Redis for data that changes rarely
   • Look into compressing cached data with Snappy to reduce Redis network bandwidth
   • Look into storing cached data as Protocol Buffers instead of JSON; measured on the cached Item Document data, Snappy and protobuf together are expected to cut the size by about 73%
   • Keep improving the architecture for traffic growth, building on the cache restructuring, stronger monitoring and read separation already applied

   Lessons

   CPU and memory metrics alone did not show the problem, so Redis needs network monitoring against the node's bandwidth baseline. Burst credits kept the nodes working for about two hours after traffic passed the baseline, which delayed the failure and made its cause slower to find.

   View case
2. IL-0103 During an EKS node AMI update, Istio sidecars crash-looped because hundreds of pods restarting at once overloaded the external certificate authority behind istiod

   Tetrate (unnamed U.S. federal customer)2025sev1

   Symptoms

   While the customer was updating the AMIs of its Amazon EKS nodes across more than 30 clusters running Istio, sidecar-injected workloads in one cluster failed to start and showed CrashLoopBackOff.

   Container crash loopProbe failures

   Trigger

   Updating the EKS node AMIs, which started hundreds of sidecar-injected pods at the same time.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   IstioAdmission webhookNode operating system image

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnknown limit

   Detection

   Sidecar-injected workloads in the updated cluster failed to start and showed CrashLoopBackOff; the customer raised a Severity 1 ticket and a Tetrate engineer was reviewing logs within six minutes.

   Remediation

   • scaled istiod down temporarily from 40 replicas to 1 to slow Istio's internal processes and ease the load on the CA
   • deleted the CertificateSigningRequests stuck in the Approved, Failed state
   • restarted the pods gradually in a controlled order instead of all at once

   Lessons

   When a mesh hands certificate signing to an external CA, every pod start becomes a signing request to that CA, so a mass restart such as a node image rollout can overload it. Sidecars then abort under istiod's 10-second default CA timeout even though the CSRs are eventually signed. Restarting pods in controlled batches keeps the request rate within what the CA can handle. The author's point is that diagnosing such a failure means looking at the whole service mesh ecosystem, including its external dependencies, not only Istio.

   View case
3. IL-0044 Prometheus OOMKilled in a loop while replaying its write-ahead log after a kube-prometheus-stack upgrade

   Saifeddine Rajhi2024

   Symptoms

   After an upgrade of the kube-prometheus-stack Helm chart, several pods stayed not ready. Among them was prometheus-prometheus-operator-prometheus-0, showing 3/4 Running and a recent termination.

   OOMKilledProbe failuresMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   During the kube-prometheus-stack Helm chart upgrade, Prometheus had to replay its write-ahead log on startup, and the replay needed more memory than its limit allowed.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   PrometheusContainer memory limit

   Contributing factor

   Unknown limitNo headroom

   Detection

   The team noticed pods not ready after the Helm chart upgrade and found the OOMKilled termination with kubectl describe pod.

   Remediation

   • ran promtool tsdb analyze inside the Prometheus pod to find high-cardinality metrics such as haproxy_server_http_responses_total

   Action items

   • Verify that the memory overhead during WAL replay stays within acceptable limits, for example 10 to 15%, and do not run Prometheus close to its memory limit
   • Optimise storage, scraping and remote write configuration and upgrade to newer Prometheus releases
   • Recover automatically from OOM crash loops, for example by deleting the WAL on OOM events
   • Enforce scrape limits so Prometheus stops scraping targets when memory use passes a threshold

   Lessons

   Size Prometheus for its restart, not only for steady state: WAL replay can need far more memory than normal running, and a Prometheus that already runs near its limit can be OOM-killed during the replay. Much of Prometheus memory use comes from cardinality, which promtool tsdb analyze can measure even when Prometheus itself is down.

   View case
4. IL-0046 Prometheus restarted again and again because its WAL replay took longer than the startup probe allowed

   UK Ministry of Justice2024

   Symptoms

   At 12:32 Prometheus on the Cloud Platform was not available after a planned change, and the Prometheus pod had restarted several times. The platform lost its monitoring and had missing metrics for the period.

   Monitoring outageProbe failures

   Trigger

   A planned change restarted Prometheus at a time when the WAL count was high.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Prometheus

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnknown limit

   Detection

   The team saw that the Prometheus pod had restarted several times after the planned change.

   Remediation

   • raised the Prometheus startupProbe threshold to 30 minutes

   Action items

   • Perform planned Prometheus restarts when the WAL count is lower
   • Set the default CPU and memory requests to meet maximum usage
   • Create a test setup that recreates the live WAL count
   • Explore the memory-snapshot-on-shutdown and auto-gomaxprocs feature flags
   • Explore storing WAL files remotely in a different location
   • Look into a blue-green Prometheus to test changes on a live-like setup before applying them to live
   • Spike into Amazon Managed Prometheus

   View case
5. IL-0012 CPU limits and an unpatched kernel CFS quota bug throttled multi-threaded services into stalls, failed health checks and timeouts

   Omio2020

   Symptoms

   For about six months, applications on Omio's Google Kubernetes Engine clusters stalled at random: they got stuck, stopped answering health check requests or lost network connections, and nothing the team looked at explained why.

   CPU throttlingProbe failuresHigh error rateHigh latencyIntermittent timeoutsIntermittent connection failures

   Trigger

   Multi-threaded workloads running with CPU limits on nodes whose kernel did not yet have the fix for a known CFS quota bug that causes unnecessary throttling.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Container CPU limitLinux kernelkubelet

   Contributing factor

   Unknown limitMonitoring blind spotUnpatched known bug

   Detection

   Months of random stalls and failed health checks led the team to read the cgroup cpu.stat throttling counters inside the pods, which showed far more throttling than the limits should allow.

   Remediation

   • removed CPU limits until the kernel with the CFS bug fix was deployed across all clusters

   Action items

   • Deploy the kernel with the CFS quota bug fix across all clusters
   • Monitor utilisation, saturation and error metrics, API latency and error rates to confirm the change behaves as expected

   Lessons

   A CPU limit is a time quota per 100 ms period, not a share of cores, so a multi-threaded container can be stopped for most of each period long before it uses the cores it was given, and a kernel bug can make that worse. Throttling is invisible in standard Kubernetes metrics and has to be read from the cgroup counters. Removing limits trades away protection against a container that takes a whole node, which is only acceptable when runtimes are tuned.

   View case

By root cause3