Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

1. IL-0020 During an EKS 1.30 upgrade the descheduler tried to reschedule every pod on the cordoned nodes at once and production workloads went down

   UK Ministry of Justice2025

   Symptoms

   At 09:36 on 18 March 2025, during the upgrade of the live cluster to EKS 1.30, users reported that their pods were being terminated and were not restarting automatically, in both production and non-production environments. Automated infrastructure alerts fired as well, and production services had outages.

   Pod evictionPods PendingService outageUpgrade stall

   Trigger

   Upgrading the live EKS cluster from 1.29 to 1.30, during which the descheduler attempted to reschedule all pods on the cordoned nodes simultaneously.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   DeschedulerNode poolCluster autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   No headroomNo alert on limitUnreviewed defaults

   Detection

   Users reported at 09:36 that pods were being terminated and not restarting, and automated infrastructure alerts fired.

   Remediation

   • Removed the cordon annotation so pods could be rescheduled
   • Deleted stuck 1.30 nodes to force their recreation
   • Added a new node group of 20 nodes running 1.30 by hand
   • Cordoned and drained all old 1.29 nodes onto the new 1.30 nodes

   Action items

   • Raise an AWS Production System Down support case (Case ID: 174229643100496)
   • Get guidance from AWS support on querying control-plane logs to find the root cause of similar issues
   • Document a runbook for emergency scaling of a new node group in case of unexpected capacity shortages
   • Alert on an imbalance between the autoscaling group and the Kubernetes nodes
   • Review the descheduler configuration to understand why it throws pods off cordoned nodes, and fix it where possible
   • Alert on spikes in the pending pod count

   Lessons

   The write-up lists review actions rather than lessons. They show the team had no documented way to add an emergency node group, no alert on a mismatch between the autoscaling group and the nodes Kubernetes sees, no alert on a spike in pending pods, and no clear understanding of how the descheduler treats cordoned nodes.

   View case
2. IL-0530 Virtual router controllers in us-central1 ran out of memory in a loop, cutting networking for new and migrated VMs

   Google Cloud2023

   Symptoms

   On 5 October 2023 in us-central1, newly created VMs waited a long time before their networking worked, and VMs that had been live migrated lost connectivity for a long time after the migration. Networking telemetry showed cross-region packet loss to and from us-central1 from 03:08 US/Pacific. Health check state of VMs reached load balancers late.

   Packet lossNetwork unreachableOOMKilledStale endpoint routingCluster or node provisioning stall

   Trigger

   A management plane behaviour change, meant to decouple the processing of API updates to Instance Groups and Network Endpoint Groups used as load balancer backends, was deployed in us-central1 after rolling out to several other regions without incident.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)Cloud load balancer

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo alert on limit

   Detection

   Engineers were alerted to slowness in the virtual network control plane in us-central1 at 21:45 US/Pacific on 4 October, before the packet loss started, and to controller failures from memory exhaustion at 02:11 on 5 October. Networking telemetry showed cross-region packet loss from 03:08.

   Remediation

   • Increased the memory allocated to the virtual network router controllers
   • Rolled back the management plane change in us-central1
   • Restarted by hand the routers that were still not accepting updates

   Action items

   • Alert proactively on memory risks and unexpected memory increases
   • Refactor the deployment configuration so engineers can reallocate memory much faster
   • Re-evaluate existing practices and add safety mechanisms for API reconciliation
   • Make management plane changes more visible across teams so the changes can be correlated faster
   • Adjust the deployment footprint so a regional API change is less likely to exhaust memory across the region at once
   • Optimise memory use in the traffic routers and their controllers

   View case
3. IL-0467 Boskos crash-looped after a node drain started it from a buggy StatefulSet image, failing Kubernetes PR jobs for 9 hours

   Kubernetes project2019

   Symptoms

   Overnight into 26 March 2019 (PDT), every Prow test job that needed a GCP project from Boskos, the Kubernetes test-infra service that hands out GCP projects to test jobs, failed. The required job pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce failed on every run, so no pull request could be merged in kubernetes/kubernetes for just over nine hours, and other projects saw similar failures.

   Container crash loopService outage

   Trigger

   At 23:04 PDT the node running the only Boskos pod was drained to be replaced with a 1.13 node during the upgrade of the Prow clusters from Kubernetes 1.11 to 1.13. The replacement pod started from the StatefulSet's current spec, which named a newer Boskos image containing the bug.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   CI systemNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectUnverified assumptionSingle point of failureNo alert on limitChange started before off-hours

   Detection

   Users reported the failure on GitHub at 02:50 and on Slack at 05:16 and 06:27, and an engineer saw the Slack reports on waking at 07:16. The Boskos monitoring dashboard showed the failure, but no alert caught it.

   Remediation

   • Built and deployed a new Boskos image with the bug fixed
   • Cleaned up the GCP projects that had been left open

   Action items

   • Change the Boskos configuration so that deployments actually take effect (#11956)
   • Automate Boskos deploys (#11957)
   • Improve alerting on Boskos status (#11953)

   Lessons

   The write-up lists what went poorly: a ten-hour upgrade was started shortly after 17:00 when on-call coverage ended at 18:00; deployments were not checked to confirm that something had actually rolled out; the Boskos StatefulSet was not set up to perform updates, so changing its spec left the old pod running; the December change appears never to have been tested; and Boskos was deployed by hand, unlike most of Prow, which left more room for error. Once people were available, the problem was fixed quickly.

   View case

By root cause1