Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomPods stuck in ContainerCreatingFactorNo alert on limitDomainKubernetesClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    On Adyen's production big data Kubernetes clusters, new pods on some nodes could not start because setting up their network through Cilium timed out. Once one pod had timed out, every other pod trying to start on the same node timed out as well.

    Trigger

    Heavy data workloads landed on nodes where the interval of Cilium's periodic garbage collection of expired connection tracking entries had grown, during a quiet period, toward its 12-hour maximum.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • Set a fixed connection tracking garbage collection interval, conntrackGCInterval: 60s, and rolled it out to the Cilium DaemonSet
    Action items
    • Alert on the connection tracking garbage collection duration and table size metrics
    Lessons

    Scaling parameters can interact with other logic months later as traffic grows: the larger table that solved capacity limits on 512GB nodes interacted with the garbage collection auto-scaling on the 2TB nodes. Logs only showed symptoms, so profiling and tracing across the container runtime, the CNI plugin, the Cilium agent and the kernel were needed, and simple arithmetic with measured numbers pointed at the cause early. Auto-scaling algorithms need bounds, and the 12-hour maximum interval was too long for this workload. A timeout protects the caller but does not cancel the work behind it. Adyen recommends that Cilium deployments with dynamic workloads alert on cilium_datapath_conntrack_gc_duration_seconds and cilium_datapath_conntrack_gc_entries and set conntrackGCInterval: 60s.

  2. Symptoms

    At 13:42 the RootVolUtilisation-Critical alert fired in the high-priority alerts channel. At 14:03 a user reported image pull errors with the message "no space left on device".

    Trigger

    Upgrading the EKS Terraform module to version 18, which changed the node launch template, and draining workloads onto the new nodes it created.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The RootVolUtilisation-Critical alert fired in the high-priority alerts channel at 13:42, and a user reported "no space left on device" image pull errors at 14:03.

    Remediation
    • Uncordoned the old default node group and drained the new nodes to move workloads back
    • Identified the launch template change that cut the root volume to 20 GB and applied a fix on the manager and live clusters
    • Drained the old node group onto the fixed nodes
    Action items
    • Update the runbook to compare launch template changes during an EKS module upgrade
    • Create a test setup that pulls images of different sizes, like live
    • Update the RootVolUtilisation alert runbook to check the disk space configuration
    • Scale CoreDNS dynamically based on the number of nodes
    • Investigate whether IPv6 can solve the IP prefix starvation problem
    • Add drift testing to identify when a terraform plan shows a change to the launch template
    • Set up logging for the CNI and ipamd logs and alerts on errors related to IP prefix starvation
    Lessons

    The write-up lists review actions rather than lessons. They aim at two gaps: the launch template changes brought by a module upgrade were not compared or drift-tested before rollout, and there were no CNI or ipamd logs or alerts to show the IP prefix starvation the team suspected during the drain.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Cilium and CoreDNS. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1