Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomProbe failuresFactorNo resource requests or limitsDomainKubernetesClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    One Monday morning the author opened the Prometheus dashboard to check a Kubernetes cluster for alerts and could not reach it. The Prometheus pod was in CrashLoopBackOff: kubectl get pods showed it 1/2 ready with 950 restarts over 3d20h on worker3.

    Trigger

    After start, the Prometheus time series count rose to 2,162,256 within five minutes and its memory use filled the 8GB host.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The author found it on a Monday morning when the Prometheus dashboard, opened to check the cluster for alerts, could not be reached.

    Remediation
    • removed most of the unnecessary settings from the Prometheus ConfigMap, after which the container stopped crashing
    Action items
    • Set appropriate resource requests and limits on the Prometheus pod
    • Reduce unneeded metrics by adjusting scrape targets or scrape interval
    • Estimate Prometheus memory needs, provide dedicated hosts with a node label such as deploy-topology: Prometheus, and pin the Prometheus pod to them with a nodeSelector
    Lessons

    Exit code 137 together with an OOM event in the kubelet log means the kernel killed the container, not kubelet. Under node memory pressure the kernel kills the process with the highest score, and kubelet derives each container's oom_score_adj from the pod's QoS class: a container without a memory request in a pod where another container has one ends up Burstable with a score near 1000, so it is killed first. In a large cluster, Prometheus memory needs to be estimated from the expected series count and requested explicitly.

  2. Symptoms

    On 30 November 2017 at 16:59 PST, mybinder.org operators noticed that Grafana looked wrong and that launching a new server failed with an error that a temporary user could not be created. Pods that were already running kept running, but no new ones were being created.

    Trigger

    A build container, which ran without a memory limit, most likely used up all the memory on the node that ran the proxy pod.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    An operator happened to look at Grafana at 16:59 PST, saw that it looked wrong, and confirmed the error by launching a new server.

    Remediation
    • Cordoned the node that had run out of memory
    • Uncordoned the node once the proxy was working
    Action items
    • Limit the memory available to build pods
    • Change the JupyterHub configuration so user pods are not cleaned up when the jupyterhub pod restarts
    • Nominate one person to drive the response, possibly in a shared terminal, so only one person changes the cluster
    • Alert when something is wrong with the cluster, for example by counting 4xx responses on the jupyterhub pod
Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Ingress controller and JupyterHub. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1