Graph
Cases2 cases
1 to 2 of 2
IL-0214PagerDuty's Kafka brokers ran out of JVM heap one after another, and the event APIs rejected events with 502 responsesPagerDuty2025- Symptoms
When a Kafka cluster of PagerDuty's US Service Regions began failing at 03:53 UTC on 28 August 2025, the first alerts pointed to one failing broker. More brokers then ran out of memory, and PagerDuty's event APIs began rejecting incoming events with a response status code of 502 while notifications, webhooks, chat integrations and the REST API degraded.
- Trigger
A new feature that recorded API key usage in a Kafka topic was being rolled out by configuration: 1% on 21 August, 5% and then 25% on 27 August, and 75% on 28 August. A logical error in the feature created a new Kafka producer for every API request instead of reusing one producer.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Alerts pointed to one failing Kafka broker at the start of the first incident, and alerts fired again at 16:38 UTC when Kafka performance degraded for the second time. Critical alerts about core API errors were buried among webhook pages.
- Remediation
- Expanded the Kafka cluster and removed the first failing broker
- Doubled the Kafka broker heap size and applied it with a rolling restart across the cluster
- Added status page updates by hand through backup procedures when automated publishing failed
- Recovered Kafka-dependent services, some by manual intervention, and backfilled lost data with scripts
- In the second incident, doubled the heap again with another rolling restart
- Rolled back the API usage feature with a pull request that stopped it from publishing Kafka messages
- Action items
- Remove the dependency that blocked status page automation and simplify and republish the manual runbook
- Run live drills regularly so status updates go out even when parts of the platform are degraded
- Expand JVM and Kafka monitoring of heap, garbage collection and producer and consumer health
- Strengthen service dependency mapping so cascading failures are easier to trace
- Collect customer impact metrics into incident workflows automatically
- Add stricter change management guardrails, with readiness checklists and slower ramp-up windows for major rollouts
- Improve recovery mechanisms in the streaming systems
- Automate communication workflows such as status page updates, internal and external syncs and reminders
- Test major incident workflows monthly with chaos engineering, such as status page failover
- Define clearer incident severity levels and roles, including dedicated communications liaisons
- Lessons
PagerDuty found its message processing more intricate than it had thought: some services had to be restarted to pick up changes, some API activity produced far more messages than expected, and it was hard to tell which parts of the system put heavy load on Kafka. Because producers and JVM heap were barely observed, responders could not see the first failure until several downstream systems were affected, and no one on the call held a model of the whole system. Enabling the feature through configuration rather than a separate deployment was meant as a safety step but made the outage harder to link to the change. Runbooks and backfill scripts were imperfect but gave responders a head start, and the second incident was mitigated in about 50 minutes by repeating the first incident's steps.
- Symptoms
On 2025-03-12 from 10:58 UTC, alerts for high backend response times came in, and the MediaWiki deployments mw-api-int, mw-parsoid and mw-jobrunner, which serve MediaWiki for non-user-facing purposes, showed high latency and database errors. The External Storage cluster, whose hosts store the compressed text of wiki page revisions, had a sharp rise in load and connections. The same happened again on 2025-03-13 from 11:15 UTC.
- Trigger
At 10:44 UTC on 12 March a Scap deployment of the PHP 8.1 rollout for mw-api-int, mw-parsoid and mw-jobrunner was run with the flag -Dbuild_mw_container_image:False; the rollout was deployed with Scap again at 11:15 UTC on 13 March.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Alerts for high backend response times started at 10:58 UTC on 12 March, 14 minutes after the Scap deployment; 2 on-call engineers were paged. The MediaWikiMemcachedHighErrorRate alert that pointed at the cause fired only briefly because its log pipeline was overloaded.
- Remediation
- Deployed a patch to cirrus-streaming-updater that reduced SUP parallelism
- Reduced the concurrency of the categoryMembershipChange job in changeprop-jobqueue
- On 12 March, reverted 1126607 and 1126650 and re-ran Scap
- On 13 March, rolling-restarted changeprop-jobqueue
- Rolling-restarted mw-api-int
- Disabled the categorymembership job in changeprop-jobqueue
- Reverted 1127476 and 1127478
- Redeployed mw-api-int to pick up the revert
- Increased the number of mw-api-int replicas
- Redeployed mw-jobrunner to pick up the revert
- Redeployed mw-parsoid to pick up the revert
- Action items
- Reduce the number of messages sent through channel:Memcached during failures
- Add helm rollback functionality to Scap
- Decide whether Scap should update helmfile-defaults when -Dbuild_mw_container_image:False is set
- Consider removing envvars.inc from MediaWiki images
- Consider "Why" dashboards that give an overview of a group of related components together with relevant links to follow
- Coordinate incident responders better
- Be able to work with MediaWiki developers during incidents
- Lessons
The write-up puts the weight not on the technical root cause but on why the team could not see, even after the 12 March incident, that three MediaWiki deployments were running without Memcached. Alert dashboards showed what was happening, such as many busy PHP workers, but not why; dashboards linking components that affect each other, such as SQLBlobStore keys and External Storage, would have helped. The alert that pointed in the right direction did not stay firing and would probably have been lost among 78 others. The incident coordinator could not tell who was working on what or who had joined or left, the channels were noisy, the external impact was judged more critical than it was, and trace.wikimedia.org was not used although it might have helped.
These 2 cases involve In-memory cache and CI system. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause1
Faulty deployment2 cases
- Contributing factor
- Organisation