Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0214 PagerDuty's Kafka brokers ran out of JVM heap one after another, and the event APIs rejected events with 502 responses

   PagerDuty2025

   Symptoms

   When a Kafka cluster of PagerDuty's US Service Regions began failing at 03:53 UTC on 28 August 2025, the first alerts pointed to one failing broker. More brokers then ran out of memory, and PagerDuty's event APIs began rejecting incoming events with a response status code of 502 while notifications, webhooks, chat integrations and the REST API degraded.

   Memory pressureHigh error rateThroughput degradation

   Trigger

   A new feature that recorded API key usage in a Kafka topic was being rolled out by configuration: 1% on 21 August, 5% and then 25% on 27 August, and 75% on 28 August. A logical error in the feature created a new Kafka producer for every API request instead of reusing one producer.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Message broker

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotSignal buried in noiseChange with a delayed effectExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Alerts pointed to one failing Kafka broker at the start of the first incident, and alerts fired again at 16:38 UTC when Kafka performance degraded for the second time. Critical alerts about core API errors were buried among webhook pages.

   Remediation

   • Expanded the Kafka cluster and removed the first failing broker
   • Doubled the Kafka broker heap size and applied it with a rolling restart across the cluster
   • Added status page updates by hand through backup procedures when automated publishing failed
   • Recovered Kafka-dependent services, some by manual intervention, and backfilled lost data with scripts
   • In the second incident, doubled the heap again with another rolling restart
   • Rolled back the API usage feature with a pull request that stopped it from publishing Kafka messages

   Action items

   • Remove the dependency that blocked status page automation and simplify and republish the manual runbook
   • Run live drills regularly so status updates go out even when parts of the platform are degraded
   • Expand JVM and Kafka monitoring of heap, garbage collection and producer and consumer health
   • Strengthen service dependency mapping so cascading failures are easier to trace
   • Collect customer impact metrics into incident workflows automatically
   • Add stricter change management guardrails, with readiness checklists and slower ramp-up windows for major rollouts
   • Improve recovery mechanisms in the streaming systems
   • Automate communication workflows such as status page updates, internal and external syncs and reminders
   • Test major incident workflows monthly with chaos engineering, such as status page failover
   • Define clearer incident severity levels and roles, including dedicated communications liaisons

   Lessons

   PagerDuty found its message processing more intricate than it had thought: some services had to be restarted to pick up changes, some API activity produced far more messages than expected, and it was hard to tell which parts of the system put heavy load on Kafka. Because producers and JVM heap were barely observed, responders could not see the first failure until several downstream systems were affected, and no one on the call held a model of the whole system. Enabling the feature through configuration rather than a separate deployment was meant as a safety step but made the outage harder to link to the change. Runbooks and backfill scripts were imperfect but gave responders a head start, and the second incident was mitigated in about 50 minutes by repeating the first incident's steps.

   View case
2. IL-0383 PagerDuty's shared Cassandra cluster degraded during a repair, delaying notifications and losing incoming events

   PagerDuty2014sev1

   Symptoms

   On 3 June 2014, PagerDuty's notification pipeline performed poorly and some notifications were delayed after the Cassandra cluster behind it became heavily degraded. About 3% of events sent to the integration API could not be received.

   Database overloadHigh error rateHigh latency

   Trigger

   On 3 June 2014 the Cassandra background repair process started its normal run on one node of the cluster while other high load was on the cluster; on 4 June the team restarted the postponed repair by hand.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Database

   Contributing factor

   No headroomExcessive blast radiusHarmful manual actionIgnored early signal

   Remediation

   • Reduced the load on the Cassandra cluster
   • Stopped the Cassandra repair process
   • Cut communication between some Cassandra nodes to stabilise the cluster
   • On 4 June, deleted all in-flight data in the notification pipeline in a "factory reset"
   • Brought downstream systems back into a consistent state with the emptied pipeline by hand

   Action items

   • Scale the existing Cassandra nodes vertically to bigger, faster servers
   • Set up multiple Cassandra clusters and spread the workloads across them
   • Set system load thresholds at which the Cassandra clusters are scaled out horizontally ahead of need
   • Upgrade the current and new clusters to a more recent Cassandra version
   • Add more load shedding techniques to control Cassandra under high load
   • Bring more Cassandra expertise in-house

   Lessons

   PagerDuty concluded that its Cassandra cluster was underscaled and shared by too many services with different load and usage patterns, and that the scaling work should have come before the planned Cassandra version upgrade.

   View case

By root cause2