Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomIntermittent connection failuresFactorUnknown limitClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    For about six months, applications on Omio's Google Kubernetes Engine clusters stalled at random: they got stuck, stopped answering health check requests or lost network connections, and nothing the team looked at explained why.

    Trigger

    Multi-threaded workloads running with CPU limits on nodes whose kernel did not yet have the fix for a known CFS quota bug that causes unnecessary throttling.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Months of random stalls and failed health checks led the team to read the cgroup cpu.stat throttling counters inside the pods, which showed far more throttling than the limits should allow.

    Remediation
    • removed CPU limits until the kernel with the CFS bug fix was deployed across all clusters
    Action items
    • Deploy the kernel with the CFS quota bug fix across all clusters
    • Monitor utilisation, saturation and error metrics, API latency and error rates to confirm the change behaves as expected
    Lessons

    A CPU limit is a time quota per 100 ms period, not a share of cores, so a multi-threaded container can be stopped for most of each period long before it uses the cores it was given, and a kernel bug can make that worse. Throttling is invisible in standard Kubernetes metrics and has to be read from the cgroup counters. Removing limits trades away protection against a container that takes a whole node, which is only acceptable when runtimes are tuned.

  2. Symptoms

    Shortly after a round of changes, loveholidays saw connectivity problems and raised error rates on its aggregation service. The service is a proxy between two other services of more than 100 instances each, handles over 10,000 requests per second continuously and can spike to four times that.

    Trigger

    Three changes together: a change in service architecture, halving the RAM of the nodes that run the aggregation service, and sharding a downstream service, which doubled the number of connections to track.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Rising error rates and climbing connection reset errors in HAProxy, then node_exporter conntrack metrics compared with their limit.

    Remediation
    • moved the aggregation service to nodes with more RAM
    • limited the number of aggregation service pods per node
    Action items
    • Alert when conntrack table use goes above 75%, with (node_nf_conntrack_entries / on (pod) node_nf_conntrack_entries_limit / on (pod) group_right kube_pod_info) > 0.75
    Lessons

    The conntrack limit is tied to node memory, so resizing a node pool silently resizes the connection table, and on GKE the ratio did not match the commonly cited formula. A high-traffic proxy on small nodes can exhaust it, and the symptoms are connection resets and timeouts, so conntrack use needs its own metric and alert.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve conntrack table and Container CPU limit. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2