Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomHigh error rateFactorPartial rolloutClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    From 12:06 US/Pacific on 12 June 2024, services built on Vertex AI Prediction began reporting failed user requests in eight regions: us-central1, asia-southeast1, europe-west3, europe-west4, us-east1, us-west1, northamerica-northeast1 and us-east4.

    Trigger

    Starting on 8 June 2024, a new form of user request to the GenerateContent API caused intermittent segmentation faults in the Vertex Serving Prediction API servers; on 12 June the rate of such requests increased.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Internal production monitoring alerted engineers to the segfaults on 10 June 2024 at 07:35 US/Pacific, before any visible customer impact; on 12 June services built on Vertex Prediction reported failing user requests.

    Remediation
    • confirmed the new failures came from the same segfault found on 10 June
    • accelerated the rollout of the fix that was already in progress, completed at 15:59 US/Pacific
    Action items
    • Ensure early signals of server binary issues are captured in production health analysis and investigated in time
    • Ensure release validation of feature changes and updates in production
    Lessons

    A crash that only some requests trigger can stay invisible while load balancers route around the restarting servers. It becomes an outage when the share of such requests grows until too many servers are restarting at once. Here the cause was known and a fix was rolling out two days before customers were affected, but the progressive rollout had not finished when the triggering traffic increased; Google's follow-up is to investigate early signals of server binary issues in time.

  2. Symptoms

    On Friday 19 July 2019 the Grafana Cloud Hosted Prometheus service, which is built on the Cortex project, was down for 26 minutes. New error-budget-based Prometheus alerts paged the on-call engineer within 4 minutes of the start.

    Trigger

    An engineer created a new dedicated Cortex cluster for a large customer. Its configuration did not include the new pod priorities, so all its pods got the default medium priority, and the Kubernetes cluster did not have enough free resources to fit it.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    New error-budget-based Prometheus alerts paged the on-call engineer within 4 minutes of the start of the outage.

    Remediation
    • Scaled up the underlying Kubernetes cluster to fit both the new and the production Cortex clusters
    • Diagnosed and fixed the out-of-memory errors in the authenticating reverse proxies in front of Cortex
    Action items
    • Give the production ingesters the high priority class, which should have been done before medium became the default
    • Have more people review changes to configuration that is global to the cluster
    • Require a design document for every configuration change outside a namespace
    • Automate the sizing of the frontend authenticating reverse proxy so it does not run out of memory under overload
    • Investigate the default backoff and scaling behaviour of Prometheus to prevent a stampeding herd of retries
    Lessons

    Medium should not have become the default priority until the production ingesters had the high priority, and that designation should have reached production sooner. The change was considered too minor for a design document and was only discussed in a GitHub issue; cluster-global configuration needs more scrutiny. On the positive side, once Cortex had enough capacity it recovered by itself, and Grafana Loki helped confirm that the ingesters exited gracefully.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Cloud load balancer and Model inference server. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2