Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomData lossFactorMissed in reviewClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    From 9 February 2026, InfluxDB Cloud customers on the AWS us-east-1 cluster prod101-us-east-1 found that some recent data did not show up in query responses. The first support ticket about data availability came in on 9 February, the day a compaction change was deployed, and more tickets followed on 10 February.

    Trigger

    On 9 February 2026 InfluxData deployed to prod101-us-east-1 a compaction change that runs several compaction jobs in parallel on one partition, each on a subset of the data chosen by org id prefix.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Tickets about data availability were raised, the first on 9 February and more on 10 February, when the status page reported that some recent data was not showing up in query responses.

    Remediation
    • Rolled back the compaction change
    • Restored recent data first, rebuilt from the Kafka logs
    • Changed the restoration process to make historical data recovery more efficient
    • Restored historical data from the weekly TSM snapshots
    • Kept the cluster online and restored data incrementally so ingest and queries could continue
    Action items
    • Expand test coverage for changes to critical storage components such as the compactor, with scenarios closer to production-scale workloads
    • Strengthen safeguards around compaction so failures are detected and handled safely
    • Review restoration workflows and procedures to reduce elevated TTBR and slow queries during large restores
    • Revisit the backup and restore strategy to speed up cluster-wide restorations
  2. Symptoms

    During emergency maintenance on 5 January 2012, a bulk deletion of unneeded file systems on the Sakura Cloud storage device also deleted 53 disks that customers were using. The deleted disks could not be restored from backup.

    Trigger

    In the emergency maintenance on 5 January 2012, Sakura Internet ran a batch command written only for that maintenance to delete unneeded file systems on the storage device in bulk.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Action items
    • Simplify the process for deleting unneeded file systems
    • Do not run scripts that have not been reviewed and tested enough
Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Database backups and snapshots and Cloud block storage. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2