Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomGPU unavailableFactorSingle point of failureClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    Over a 54-day snapshot of Llama 3 405B pre-training the training job was interrupted 466 times. 47 interruptions were planned: automated maintenance such as firmware upgrades, or operator actions such as configuration or dataset updates. The other 419 were unexpected. Because training is synchronous, a failure on a single GPU can force a restart of the whole job.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The communication library's state is monitored and a stalled collective is timed out automatically; on an NCCLX watchdog or heartbeat timeout the PyTorch NCCL flight recorder dumps its tracing data, including collective metadata and stack traces.

    Remediation
    • handled almost every interruption through automation, with significant manual intervention only three times in 54 days
    Action items
    • Reduce job startup and checkpointing time
    • Use the PyTorch NCCL flight recorder to record every communication event and collective duration and to dump traces on NCCLX watchdog or heartbeat timeouts
    • Turn on heavier tracing and metadata collection in production through online configuration changes, without a code release or job restart
    • Give PyTorch access to NCCLX internal state so stalls are detected and localised faster, with a snapshot of the failing collective's finished and pending transfers
    Lessons

    Training on 16K GPUs has more failure modes than Meta's much larger CPU clusters, and because training is synchronous a single GPU failure can force a restart of the whole job. Meta raised effective training time by cutting job startup and checkpoint time and by building tools for fast diagnosis, and kept it above 90% while automated firmware and kernel maintenance caused at least one interruption a day.

  2. Symptoms

    At 20:31 UTC on 15 November 2023, some GPU virtual machines in us-northcentral1-a became unavailable. One row of servers in a Crusoe Cloud data center in the us-northcentral1 region had lost power, and every server in the row powered off together with the VMs running on it.

    Trigger

    While the row's UPS was in bypass mode for routine maintenance, power switched from the primary source to a backup source for reasons unrelated to the maintenance.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The power failure happened at 20:31 UTC. The first status post, at 21:07 UTC, said certain VMs in us-northcentral1-a were unavailable, and at 21:31 UTC the status page said the affected VMs had been identified.

    Remediation
    • identified the VMs on the row that lost power
    • restarted the affected VMs after power was restored
    Action items
    • Review the standard operating procedures for UPS maintenance to minimise customer impact during future maintenance
    • Build future data centers with redundant UPSs
    • Improve recovery procedures to reduce mean time to resolution
    Lessons

    When the only UPS for a row is in bypass for maintenance, the row is exposed to any power event during that window, even one unrelated to the work. Crusoe Cloud's response is redundant UPSs in future data centers, a review of maintenance procedures, and faster recovery of VMs after power returns.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Data center power and cooling and GPU hardware and memory. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2