Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeFaulty deploymentSymptomHigh latencyOrganisationCircleCIClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

  1. Symptoms

    On April 3, 2025, from 22:08 to 23:45 UTC, CircleCI customers saw higher latency and some failures when starting and cancelling workflows and jobs, and had delays and trouble viewing workflows in the UI. Nine minutes after the blue/green cutover of the workflows database, the team found increased latency in the workflows service and errors from jobs dropped after using up their 10 minutes of retries.

    Trigger

    A blue/green upgrade of the database behind the CircleCI workflows service cut over to the new database at 22:08 UTC.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    –
    Detection

    At 22:17 UTC the team identified increased latency in the workflows service and errors from jobs dropped after exhausting their 10-minute retries.

    Remediation
    • Restarted the workflows pods so all of them connected to the correct database
    • Upsized the new database and disabled non business critical operations on it
    • Scaled the workflows service down to a single pod while the statistics table was rebuilt
    • Re-enabled writes on the old database and restored it as primary
    Action items
    • Run an analysis procedure after every major version change in blue/green database deployments
    • Tested running analyze on a database under pressure, found it does not degrade performance further, and noted this for future remediation
    • Add automated tests and manual checkpoints throughout migrations to catch problems before the blue/green cutover
  2. Symptoms

    At about 23:00 UTC on 21 January 2025, an automated alert reported that the CircleCI database instance holding archived data was almost out of free storage space. From 23:50 UTC customers saw slow starts and cancellations of workflows and jobs, and delays and difficulty viewing workflows in the CircleCI UI, although pipelines for a specific project could still be viewed.

    Trigger

    A code change to a function in the archival database on 16 January 2025 unintentionally made it write an excessive number of log messages, and the database filled its storage.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    An automated alert at about 23:00 UTC warned that the archival database was almost out of free storage, before customers were affected. The growing workflows queue was not linked to it at first because a separate alert about request volume fired at about the same time.

    Remediation
    • Scaled up the event consumer that processes the workflows queue at 23:44 UTC
    • Promoted a read replica of the archival database to a standalone primary at 23:55 UTC
    Action items
    • Fix the database function so it no longer writes an excessive number of log messages
    • Add a max duration to the workflows retry policy for archiving so it fails earlier than the default timeout
    • Move workflow archival to an event-based model that decouples it from the workflows service
    • Add forecast and anomaly monitoring for databases that alerts on unusual activity before it reaches critical levels
    Lessons

    The storage alert on the archival database did fire, but the database filled much faster than forecast, so there was little time to act before customers were affected. Because the workflows service called the archival service synchronously, a problem in the archival database slowed the whole workflows service.

  3. Symptoms

    From about 18:50 to 19:43 UTC on Monday, November 8, 2021, CircleCI customer jobs on all executors were blocked in a "not running" state. Errors and alerts appeared right after a deploy that changed a field type in the database of the job distribution service.

    Trigger

    At 18:50 UTC a deploy changed the type of a field in the PostgreSQL database of the job distribution service, in a way that was not backwards compatible.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Errors and alerts related to the distribution failure appeared immediately after the 18:50 UTC deploy.

    Remediation
    • Rolled back the field type change, which did not clear the errors
    • Wrote, built and manually deployed a change that made the distribution system ignore the field
    • Manually scaled the primary compute cluster for the expected thundering herd of work
    • Monitored until processing was normal and resolved the incident
    Action items
    • Fix the gaps found in the testing strategy
    • Change how the distributor reacts to unexpected data so that this kind of deploy should not affect all jobs
    • Make recovery faster when unforeseen failures occur
Check your cluster for this

These 3 cases involve Database and CI system. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1