Cases7 cases

1 to 5 of 7

1. IL-0394 A Cloudflare router in Miami leaked IPv6 BGP routes to peers and providers for 25 minutes, congesting the backbone

   Cloudflare2026

   Symptoms

   On 22 January 2026 from 20:25 UTC, a Cloudflare edge router in Miami sent unintended BGP advertisements of IPv6 prefixes to its transit providers and peers. External networks' traffic was funnelled into the Miami data center, the backbone between Miami and Atlanta became congested, and some Cloudflare customer traffic saw elevated loss and higher latency.

   Packet lossHigh latency

   Trigger

   At 20:25 UTC Cloudflare's policy automation pushed a change, merged at 19:52 UTC, that removed the BGP announcements from Miami for a data center in Bogotá, Colombia, by deleting the prefix-list 6-BOG04-SITE-LOCAL from several export policy terms.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   BGP routingBackbone network (WAN)

   Contributing factor

   No configuration tests

   Detection

   The network team began investigating unintended route advertisements from Miami at 20:40 UTC, and an incident was raised at 20:44 UTC.

   Remediation

   • A network operator reverted the bad configuration change on the Miami router by hand
   • Paused the automation for the router so it could not run again
   • Reverted the triggering change in the network automation code repository
   • Unpaused the automation on the Miami router after confirming it ran without the routing policy bug

   Action items

   • Patch the failure in the routing policy automation that caused the leak
   • Add BGP community-based safeguards that reject routes received from providers and peers on external export policies
   • Add automatic routing policy evaluation to the CI/CD pipelines that looks for empty or erroneous policy terms
   • Detect problems in network configurations and the effects of automated changes earlier
   • Validate routing equipment vendors' implementations of RFC9234 before rolling out BGP roles and the Only-to-Customer Attribute
   • Encourage long-term adoption of RPKI Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA)

   Lessons

   Removing only the prefix lists from export policy terms left terms that were too permissive, because a match on route-type internal accepts IBGP routes as well. Cloudflare states that route leaks are easy to cause by accident and that RFC9234 is the only way, independent of routing policy, to prevent route leaks caused at the local AS.

   View case
2. IL-0283 Cloudflare's core proxy returned HTTP 5xx across its network after loading an oversized Bot Management feature file

   Cloudflare2025

   Symptoms

   From about 11:20 UTC on 18 November 2025, Cloudflare's network started failing to deliver core traffic, and Internet users visiting Cloudflare customers' sites got an error page that pointed to a failure inside Cloudflare's network. The volume of HTTP 5xx responses served by the network jumped far above its normal low baseline.

   High error rateService outageHigh latencyResponse quality degradation

   Trigger

   At 11:05 UTC Cloudflare deployed a ClickHouse access control change that made users' existing implicit access to the underlying tables in the r0 database explicit, so the metadata of those tables became visible in system tables such as system.columns. The change was being rolled out gradually across the cluster.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   DatabaseCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   Unverified assumptionPartial rolloutNo staged rolloutNo configuration testsOverlapping failuresRetry storm

   Detection

   The first automated test detected the issue at 11:31 UTC, three minutes after the first errors on customer HTTP traffic at 11:28. Manual investigation started at 11:32 and the incident call was created at 11:35.

   Remediation

   • Bypassed the core proxy for Workers KV and Access so they fell back to a prior proxy version, which reduced their impact
   • Stopped the automatic creation and deployment of new Bot Management feature files
   • Inserted a known good feature file into the distribution queue and deployed it globally
   • Forced a restart of the core proxy
   • Scaled control plane concurrency to clear the backlog of dashboard logins
   • Restarted the remaining services that had entered a bad state

   Action items

   • Harden the ingestion of Cloudflare-generated configuration files the same way as user-generated input
   • Enable more global kill switches for features
   • Stop core dumps and other error reports from being able to overwhelm system resources
   • Review the failure modes for error conditions across all core proxy modules

   View case
3. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours

   Cloudflare2025

   Symptoms

   From 16:27 UTC on 21 August 2025, users connecting to Cloudflare from servers in AWS us-east-1, or receiving connections from Cloudflare there, saw high latency, packet loss and failures to reach origins. Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC.

   Packet lossHigh latencyIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   At about 16:27 UTC a single customer began sending many requests from AWS us-east-1 to Cloudflare for objects in Cloudflare's cache, doubling the total traffic from Cloudflare to AWS.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnectBGP routingCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   No headroomHarmful manual actionExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC, and an incident was raised for customer impact at 17:45 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Rate limited the single customer whose traffic caused the surge
   • Took further traffic engineering actions that fully resolved the congestion
   • Asked AWS to revert its BGP prefix withdrawals, which AWS finished at 20:07 UTC

   Action items

   • Build a mechanism to deprioritise a customer's traffic when it congests the network enough to affect others
   • Speed up the Data Center Interconnect upgrades to add network capacity
   • Work with AWS so the two companies' BGP traffic engineering actions do not conflict
   • Build a traffic management system that gives each customer a network resource budget and automates the manual actions used here

   Lessons

   Cloudflare concludes that it must isolate customers better so that no single customer can take over shared network resources and degrade the platform for others, and that its network needs enough capacity to meet demand. It describes the outage as the result of insufficient network congestion management during an unusual high-traffic event.

   View case
4. IL-0284 Workers KV failed 90.22% of requests in a third-party storage outage, breaking Access, WARP and many Cloudflare products

   Cloudflare2025

   Symptoms

   At 17:52 UTC on 12 June 2025, Cloudflare's WARP team saw registrations of new devices failing and declared an incident. Minutes later the Cloudflare Access team got an alert on a rapid rise in error rates, and Service Level Objectives for several other services fell below target. All of them shared one cause: Workers KV was unavailable.

   High error rateService outageCredentials unavailable

   Trigger

   Part of the storage infrastructure behind Workers KV is backed by a third-party cloud provider, and that provider had an outage. Workers KV could then no longer serve cold reads or writes from its central data store.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Database

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureExcessive blast radiusCircular dependencyRetry storm

   Detection

   The WARP team saw registrations of new devices failing at 17:52 UTC and declared an incident. At 18:05 the Access team received an alert on a rapid increase in error rates and Service Level Objective alerts fired across several teams; at 18:06 the incidents were combined once Workers KV unavailability was identified as the shared cause.

   Remediation

   • Activated the Challenges and Turnstile kill switches so visitors were not blocked
   • Degraded Gateway rules that referenced identity or device posture state to remove the Workers KV dependency
   • Force-dropped Access identity and device posture requests to shed load on Workers KV
   • Worked on a Workers KV release against an alternative backing datastore in case the storage stayed down
   • Restored Access and Device Posture calls to Workers KV once the third-party service was back

   Action items

   • Avoid singular dependencies on storage infrastructure that Cloudflare does not own
   • Improve the ability to recover critical services, including Access, Gateway and WARP
   • Add redundancy to Workers KV's storage infrastructure and remove the dependency on any single provider
   • Make each affected product resilient to the loss of any single point of failure, third-party dependencies included
   • Build tooling to re-enable namespaces progressively during storage incidents, so services come back without overloading Cloudflare's own infrastructure

   Lessons

   Cloudflare holds itself responsible for its choice of dependencies and how it architects around them, even when a vendor failure was the trigger. Building many products on Workers KV normally makes them more robust than separate storage services would, but here the cascading failure of Workers KV made the outage worse and widened its blast radius.

   View case
5. IL-0378 All Cloudflare R2 object writes and about 35% of reads failed when the R2 Gateway could not authenticate to storage

   Cloudflare2025

   Symptoms

   From 21:38 UTC on 21 March 2025, Cloudflare R2 object storage returned errors for 1 hour and 7 minutes: all object writes failed and about 35% of object reads failed globally. R2 global availability alerts fired at 21:45 UTC, at a 2% error budget burn rate.

   Credentials unavailableHigh error rate

   Trigger

   During a routine rotation of the credentials the R2 Gateway Worker uses to authenticate with the storage infrastructure, the new credentials were deployed to the Worker of the default environment instead of the production Worker, and the old credentials were then removed from the storage infrastructure at 20:37 UTC.

   Root cause

   Operator error

   Component

   Object storage

   Contributing factor

   Unverified assumptionMonitoring blind spotChange with a delayed effect

   Detection

   R2 global availability alerts fired at 21:45 UTC, seven minutes after impact began, at a 2% error budget burn rate, and the R2 engineering team turned to operational dashboards and logs.

   Remediation

   • Deployed the new credentials to the production R2 Gateway Worker, which restored R2 availability

   Action items

   • Add logging tags with the suffix of the credential ID the R2 Gateway Worker uses
   • Require confirmation that the new token ID suffix matches storage infrastructure logs before deleting the old token
   • Run key rotation through the hotfix release tooling, which enforces the environment, instead of manual wrangler commands
   • Write the two-person validation of these changes into the standard operating procedures
   • Extend the closed loop health check system to test new keys, report their status through alerting and confirm global propagation before releasing the gateway Worker
   • Add observability views of upstream success rates that bypass caching

   Lessons

   Because the deletion of the old credentials took effect gradually, availability metrics were a poor way to confirm the change. Cloudflare said the team should have checked directly which token the R2 Gateway service was using to authenticate with the storage infrastructure instead of relying on those metrics.

   View case

By root cause6