Graph
Cases4 cases
1 to 4 of 4
IL-0063VPN outage after recreating a Redis StatefulSet restarted the whole Redis cluster without readiness checksAdGuard VPN2025- Symptoms
The day began with an alert that several instances of the Redis cluster were running out of disk space. That part was fixed quickly. The outage came an hour later: right after the Redis StatefulSet was deleted and recreated at 8:10 UTC, Kubernetes restarted every Redis pod within about five minutes, and problems started to appear.
- Trigger
To make Git match the volumes that had been resized by hand, the Redis StatefulSet was deleted with orphan (non-cascading) deletion and recreated with the new storage template; Kubernetes reconciled the new spec by restarting the entire Redis cluster.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
An alert about Redis instances running out of disk space started the work; the outage itself showed up as backend errors about Redis connections right after the StatefulSet was recreated.
- Remediation
- made the Redis masters forget obsolete node identities, reset the affected replicas and rejoined them, then waited for replication to catch up
- identified the component that was actually running out of memory, scaled the backend service and raised memory limits for that component
- temporarily relaxed probes so backend instances took traffic immediately instead of flapping between ready and not ready
- reverted the temporary workarounds at 10:00 UTC
- Action items
- Add startup probes so a Redis pod is not marked ready until its dataset is loaded
- Build an own control plane for Redis that handles restarted pods stuck to an old master address
- Reduce dependence on the single Redis cluster: move some important data to other stores, such as a separate Redis cluster per server, and use Kafka for some backend components
- Lessons
The disk resize was not the problem; the cleanup afterwards was. An immutable field pushes operators toward deleting and recreating the controller, and that can set off a full reconcile. Startup and readiness probes are what slow a rolling restart down to a safe pace; without them a distributed store restarts in the most fragile way. Recovery plans must expect a cluster to heal slowly, and dependent services need to degrade gracefully while it does.
IL-0191A label selector accidentally added to the Loki distributor Service matched only the new pods of a rollout, which took all write traffic, were OOM-killed and stalled the rolloutGrafana Labs2022- Symptoms
During a rollout of the Grafana Loki distributor Deployment in one Grafana Cloud Logs environment, the write path went down for about 25 minutes. The newly started distributor pods were OOM-killed over and over, never passed their health and readiness checks, and the rollout stopped making progress.
- Trigger
Step 1 of moving the Loki ring off a separately deployed key-value store onto embedded memberlist added a new label, gossip_ring_member: 'true', to the distributor pods and Service, together with a small config change, and the change required a rollout of the distributors.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
The first clue was kubectl get pods and the kube_deployment_status_replicas_updated metric showing that only 16 of 140 distributor pods had been updated.
- Remediation
- scaled the distributor Deployment out horizontally so the load spread over more pods with the new label and the rollout could continue
- reverted the migration step to end the outage
- set service_ignored_labels:: [$._config.gossip_member_label] and passed it to k.util.serviceFor so the label is no longer copied into the Service selector
- Action items
- Update the function that generates a Service from a Deployment or StatefulSet to handle edge cases, including this one
- Lessons
A Service whose selector is built by copying every label of a workload changes which pods it matches as soon as a new label is added. During a rollout it then matches only the new pods, which receive all the traffic before there are enough of them. A few errors during a rollout in other environments hid the problem, because those environments gave distributors more memory and could absorb the shift. Manifest diffs kept for every pull request made it possible to see that the Service selector had changed.
IL-0004A new default pod priority let a new Cortex cluster preempt every production ingester in a cascade, taking Grafana Cloud Hosted Prometheus downGrafana Labs2019- Symptoms
On Friday 19 July 2019 the Grafana Cloud Hosted Prometheus service, which is built on the Cortex project, was down for 26 minutes. New error-budget-based Prometheus alerts paged the on-call engineer within 4 minutes of the start.
- Trigger
An engineer created a new dedicated Cortex cluster for a large customer. Its configuration did not include the new pod priorities, so all its pods got the default medium priority, and the Kubernetes cluster did not have enough free resources to fit it.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
New error-budget-based Prometheus alerts paged the on-call engineer within 4 minutes of the start of the outage.
- Remediation
- Scaled up the underlying Kubernetes cluster to fit both the new and the production Cortex clusters
- Diagnosed and fixed the out-of-memory errors in the authenticating reverse proxies in front of Cortex
- Action items
- Give the production ingesters the high priority class, which should have been done before medium became the default
- Have more people review changes to configuration that is global to the cluster
- Require a design document for every configuration change outside a namespace
- Automate the sizing of the frontend authenticating reverse proxy so it does not run out of memory under overload
- Investigate the default backoff and scaling behaviour of Prometheus to prevent a stampeding herd of retries
- Lessons
Medium should not have become the default priority until the production ingesters had the high priority, and that designation should have reached production sooner. The change was considered too minor for a design document and was only discussed in a GitHub issue; cluster-global configuration needs more scrutiny. On the positive side, once Cortex had enough capacity it recovered by itself, and Grafana Loki helped confirm that the ingesters exited gracefully.
IL-0035Worker nodes went NotReady after a new ElastAlert rule without memory limits used up node memoryNU.nl2019- Symptoms
The NU.nl development team got reports that several services on one of its Kubernetes clusters behaved erratically: occasional error pages, slow responses and timeouts. The affected services were mostly internal tools and dashboards.
- Trigger
A new ElastAlert rule, deployed shortly before from the command line, that fired if the Cloudfront-* Elasticsearch indexes stopped receiving documents; those indexes take a few million requests per hour, and the rule made ElastAlert's memory grow without bound.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Users reported error pages, slow responses and timeouts from several services; no alert fired.
- Remediation
- terminated the NotReady nodes one by one so the auto-scaling group replaced them (the new nodes also went NotReady, but Prometheus and Grafana landed on a stable node)
- found the ElastAlert pods' memory growth on the Grafana pod memory dashboard
- fixed the ElastAlert problem that caused the memory growth
- Action items
- Define alerts on resource usage such as CPU, memory and disk space
- Keep researching an alerting strategy that combines Elasticsearch, Prometheus Alertmanager and New Relic
- Consider exporting metrics out of the cluster and running Grafana outside it, on EC2 or a separate Kubernetes cluster
- Either visualise the important metrics in the ELK stack or make Prometheus and Grafana more available, and improve the metrics strategy
- Set resource limits for ElastAlert through the Helm values
- Configure namespaces with default memory requests and limits
- Isolate customer-facing workloads from build, logging and monitoring workloads (a dedicated node group, or later a separate tools cluster)
- Deploy everything through automation such as Jenkins pipelines, and consider a GitOps approach
- Deploy through a pipeline that includes a smoke test step
- Make Kubernetes and cloud infrastructure work part of the team's sprints, picked up by all team members while pairing with more experienced members, and hold workshops that go deep into specific topics
- Lessons
Fixing the root cause covers only a small part of what an incident can teach; the chain of smaller failures around it is where most of the learning is. A pod without a memory limit can take whole nodes down, so limits need defaults at the namespace level. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster it watches goes blind with it. Changes installed by hand from the command line leave the rest of the team without a record of what changed.
These 4 cases involve Container memory limit and In-memory cache. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause1
Configuration change4 cases
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Unreviewed defaults2No headroom2Retry storm2Unverified assumption1Automation amplification1Excessive blast radius1Ignored early signal1Monitoring blind spot1No alert on limit1No health probes1No resource requests or limits1Partial rollout1Missed in review1Single point of failure1Unrepresentative staging1
- Organisation
IL-0063VPN outage after recreating a Redis StatefulSet restarted the whole Redis cluster without readiness checksAdGuard VPN2025IL-0191A label selector accidentally added to the Loki distributor Service matched only the new pods of a rollout, which took all write traffic, were OOM-killed and stalled the rolloutGrafana Labs2022IL-0004A new default pod priority let a new Cortex cluster preempt every production ingester in a cascade, taking Grafana Cloud Hosted Prometheus downGrafana Labs2019IL-0035Worker nodes went NotReady after a new ElastAlert rule without memory limits used up node memoryNU.nl2019