Cases22 cases

1 to 5 of 22

1. IL-0133 A storm shut down cooling at Nebius's us-central1 data center, and a disk hot-plug bug kept Managed Kubernetes control planes down for hours after power returned

   Nebius2026

   Symptoms

   On 19 August 2026 the first equipment-level signs in Nebius's us-central1 region appeared around 09:40 UTC: the InfiniBand fabric degraded and GPU over-temperature alerts began to accumulate. Customer reports followed shortly after 10:00. At 10:15 on-call engineers were paged on critical component temperature alerts, and the incident was declared at 10:21.

   Control plane unresponsiveService outageMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   A storm-related event at the data center building took the building management system offline and shut down the chilled-water cooling loop.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   Data center power and coolingCloud block storageetcdInfiniBand fabric

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureMonitoring blind spotNo alert on limitNo runbookOverlapping failures

   Detection

   No facility-level alert fired, because the storm also disabled the building management system that monitors the facility. Engineers acted on component over-temperature alerts that paged on-call at 10:15 UTC, after InfiniBand degradation, GPU over-temperature alerts and customer reports; the temperature rise from about 09:15 was visible on dashboards but had no alert.

   Remediation

   • had the facility operator switch cooling to manual bypass mode and opened rack rear doors to vent heat
   • re-energised tripped racks, control-plane racks first
   • restored the regional infrastructure control plane by manual intervention
   • restarted block-storage host components to clear stale disk attachment state
   • raised the VM recovery rate limits by hand for the region-scale recovery
   • started the affected Managed Kubernetes control-plane instances by hand
   • applied a controlled stop and start to control-plane instances whose data disk had been left unattached
   • identified and started 104 customer VMs that the incident had stopped

   Action items

   • Complete a joint resilience review with the facility operator covering redundancy of facility-management and monitoring systems, cooling that keeps running when those fail, electrical protection of cooling equipment and on-site response
   • Add facility-level environmental alerting on cooling plant state and room temperature trend that pages on-call independently of the building management system
   • Set up a documented emergency escalation path with the facility operator, with an on-call contact tree and guaranteed response times
   • Define an emergency heat-load reduction procedure with criteria, ownership and mechanics for shutting down or degrading workloads during a cooling loss
   • Establish a dependency-ordered region cold-start procedure with clear ownership for each service layer
   • Run regular region-scale recovery drills that cover VMs, storage attachments and Managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Fix the disk-attachment bug that extended the Managed Kubernetes outage and deploy the fix to all production regions
   • Improve the recovery policies Compute users can configure, and move all Managed Kubernetes control-plane nodes to the improved policy
   • Automate reconciliation of stale storage attachment state after abrupt host failures
   • Remove in-region dependencies from monitoring startup and recovery, and extend cross-region monitoring
   • Make regional health checks used for global traffic management reflect real service availability

   Lessons

   Facility monitoring that runs on the same system it watches goes silent in exactly the failure it should report, and with no alert on the room temperature trend there was no practical window to shed heat load in a controlled way. A cold start of a whole region exercised recovery paths built for isolated failures: single-attempt VM recovery, conservative rate limits and stale disk attachments all needed manual work. The longest part of the outage was restoring customer resources, Managed Kubernetes control planes above all, so Nebius is extending its recovery drills to that layer.

   View case
2. IL-0160 A repaired legacy GPU monitoring script sent a firmware query that triggers a race condition in the GPU System Processor of NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada GPUs, locking up GPU Linodes and LKE worker nodes in several regions

   Linode2026

   Symptoms

   From about 21:00 UTC on March 4, 2026, customers using Linodes backed by NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada GPUs saw the GPUs lock up. At first the problem seemed limited to worker nodes of the Linode Kubernetes Engine (LKE); later Linode confirmed that every Linode with this hardware was affected, while Standard Compute and other GPU instances were not.

   GPU unavailableControl plane unresponsive

   Trigger

   Deployment of a repaired legacy GPU monitoring script, fixed during a routine improvement effort to restore a missing metric on internal observability dashboards.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Telemetry agentGPU driver

   Contributing factor

   Missed in reviewUnverified assumption

   Detection

   Customers saw the lockups from about 21:00 UTC; the first status post went up at 02:07 UTC on March 5, about 5 hours after the lockups began.

   Remediation

   • Disabled the monitoring script across the GPU fleet
   • Rebooted the affected nodes

   Action items

   • Take improvement and prevention measures to stop a recurrence; the postmortem does not list them

   Lessons

   A monitoring script can take down the hardware it watches. A fix meant only to restore a missing metric brought back a firmware query written for an earlier GPU generation, and on the RTX 4000 Ada architecture that query against an active GPU triggers a lockup. The script ran across the GPU fleet, so every Linode with this GPU was affected in several regions, and the investigation first suspected a regression in the host hypervisor or the GPU firmware.

   View case
3. IL-0183 kubeadm's one-year leaf certificates expired, so kube-apiserver could not reach etcd, restarted in a loop and left the cluster unreachable

   ckck8032026

   Symptoms

   The cluster could not be reached from outside. On the control plane node, sudo systemctl status kubelet showed TLS handshake errors such as "http: TLS handshake error from 101.198.0.183:19517: tls: client requested unsupported application protocols" and "http: TLS handshake error from 101.198.0.172:36328: tls: client offered only unsupported versions: [302 301]".

   Control plane unresponsiveContainer crash loop

   Trigger

   The leaf certificates that kubeadm had generated for the cluster, valid for one year by default, expired at 2026-02-20 16:16 UTC.

   Root cause

   Certificate or credential expiry

   Component

   Kubernetes API serveretcdkubeletCalico

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaults

   Detection

   The author could not connect to the cluster from outside and went to the control plane node to read the kubelet logs.

   Remediation

   • renewed all expired certificates with sudo kubeadm certs renew all
   • restarted containerd and the kubelet so the static control plane pods restarted with the new certificates
   • copied the renewed /etc/kubernetes/admin.conf to $HOME/.kube/config

   Lessons

   A kubeadm cluster stops working one year after its leaf certificates were issued unless they are renewed. The first errors seen may be TLS handshake failures or a flag error that does not mention certificates; the decisive message is the x509 expiry in the kube-apiserver log for its connection to etcd. The author recommends checking expiry with kubeadm certs check-expiration and renewing from 30 days before. kubeadm upgrade apply renews the certificates too, so a cluster upgraded at least once a year avoids the problem; a cluster run for a long time without upgrades can renew from cron, for example with 0 3 1 1 * root kubeadm certs renew all && systemctl restart kubelet in /etc/cron.d/kubeadm-cert-renew.

   View case
4. IL-0162 LKE users could not reach their cluster control planes or the LKE Dashboard because an earlier database update made the internal LKE DNS service hang

   Linode2025

   Symptoms

   On 1 April 2025 users of Linode Kubernetes Engine (LKE) began having trouble connecting to their clusters' control planes, and the LKE Dashboard was affected as well. Services inside the clusters kept working. The first status update was posted at 20:28 UTC; at 21:33 UTC Linode said it was investigating an issue with DNS functionality within LKE.

   DNS resolution failuresControl plane unresponsive

   Trigger

   An earlier update to a database that the LKE DNS system depends on caused the DNS service to hang.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   Authoritative DNS servers and recordsApplication database

   Contributing factor

   –

   Detection

   The first status update, at 20:28 UTC on 1 April, said Linode was investigating and that users might have difficulty connecting to their cluster control plane. At 21:33 UTC Linode said the issue affected DNS functionality within LKE, and at 22:29 UTC that it had identified the underlying cause.

   Remediation

   • restarted the affected LKE DNS services

   Action items

   • Improve how the DNS services recover from transient connectivity failures to their dependencies
   • Improve monitoring to detect similar problems sooner
   • Update the deployment process to better coordinate changes between dependent systems

   Lessons

   A change to a database that the DNS service depends on can make the DNS service hang, which here cut off external access to the clusters and the LKE Dashboard while services inside the clusters kept working. The DNS service should recover by itself from transient failures of its dependencies, and changes to dependent systems need to be coordinated.

   View case
5. IL-0138 A failed Nvidia driver build left broken kernel packages on the only Kubernetes master node, which hit a kernel panic on reboot after a power outage and took the homelab cluster down for six days

   Barush Mendez2025

   Symptoms

   Every service in the homelab Kubernetes cluster stopped answering: the V-Rising server, Grafana, Jellyfin and Linkding were all unreachable, and the Kubernetes API was down, so the cluster could not be managed at all. The outage was found by hand, about 3 hours after it began, when someone tried to use the services.

   Control plane unresponsiveService outageMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   A power outage forced the Kubernetes master node to reboot.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   GPU driverLinux kernelKubernetes API server

   Contributing factor

   Ignored early signalChange with a delayed effectSingle point of failureMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   Manually, when someone tried to access the services; there were no automated alerts.

   Remediation

   • Connected a monitor to the master node and read the boot logs, which showed the kernel panic
   • Booted the previous kernel version, which brought the system back
   • Removed the broken Nvidia packages with sudo apt-get remove --purge '^nvidia-.*' and ran sudo dpkg --configure -a
   • Found remaining broken packages with dpkg -l | grep -v ^ii and removed them by hand
   • Ran sudo apt-get install -f and reinstalled linux-headers-$(uname -r)
   • Rebooted and confirmed the kernel panic was gone

   Action items

   • Make sure GPU driver installations fully succeed, or revert immediately when they fail
   • Move the cluster to a high-availability control plane
   • Expose the Kubernetes API through a load balancer in the HA setup
   • Set up a ticketing system to record incidents and their resolution
   • Write predefined troubleshooting workflows to shorten response time
   • Add infrastructure monitoring such as Prometheus and Grafana
   • Add blackbox HTTP and TCP checks from outside the cluster for critical services

   Lessons

   A driver installation that fails half-way can leave kernel packages broken without any visible effect until the next reboot, which may come weeks later and at the worst time. A failed DKMS build should be fixed or reverted at once. With a single master node and no monitoring from outside the cluster, one unbootable machine meant a total outage that nobody was told about; the fix itself was simple once the boot logs were seen.

   View case

By root cause9