Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases8 cases

7 to 8 of 8

  1. Symptoms

    In the week of 10 October 2022, Linode Object Storage in Newark had two incidents of reduced performance and availability, on 10 and 16 October, and in some cases the front-end gateways returned 504 gateway timeouts to customers. The second incident began while the first was still being investigated.

    Trigger

    One back-end Object Storage node had a hardware problem that was not an outright failure, so the node kept going up and down.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • Removed the failed back-end infrastructure from the Object Storage cluster
    Action items
    • Improve detection so subtle problems with failing or misbehaving hardware are found and triaged before they affect the wider cluster
    • Describe Ceph-related events more accurately to on-call administrators and define alerts more clearly
    Lessons

    Hardware that misbehaves without failing outright can cause service-wide problems, and Linode's internal monitoring had gaps in spotting such subtle issues before they affected the wider cluster.

  2. Symptoms

    The GLM-130B pretraining run on 96 nodes, started on 2022-05-06 at 04:00, was interrupted again and again by single nodes that broke down, lost connection or reported missing GPUs, and each time training had to be restarted from a saved step. On 2022-05-30 a restart got stuck in data loading because of a Lustre file system error, and the 2.3T text corpora could no longer be read.

    Trigger

    Individual nodes of the 96-node allocation failed during training, through breakdowns, a lost connection, missing GPUs, a CPU error and an NVLink error, and on 2022-05-30 the Lustre file system that held the training corpus failed.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    –
    Detection

    The Lustre error was found when a restart from global_step23200 stayed stuck in data loading.

    Remediation
    • Restarted the training from the last saved step after each node failure
    • Changed the checkpoint saving interval from 500 steps to 100 steps
    • Switched the job to another node pool and restarted from step 15600
    • Removed the suspected replacement node n30076 from step 16600, which did not change the speed
    • Copied the 2.3T text corpora from a backup disk back to the Lustre file system, which took a few days
Check your cluster for this

These 8 cases involve NIC, cable and switch port link and GPU hardware and memory. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1