Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

1. IL-0304 Intercom's US region was fully down for 71 minutes when its Vitess VTGates dropped all routes to the database shards

   Intercom2026

   Symptoms

   From 19:39 to 20:50 UTC on January 9, 2026, all Intercom services in the US region were unavailable to customers hosted there. Queries from the Intercom application could not reach the database shards, and Inbox Heartbeat Anomaly alarms fired in the US region at 19:40 UTC.

   Service outage

   Trigger

   At 18:56 UTC a configuration in the database management pipeline treated a 'branch unfreeze' action as a signal to start a Vitess v22 upgrade planned for the following week. At 19:30 UTC a MoveTables workflow failed during transient networking issues in the provider's Kubernetes cluster, and the v22 rollback logic applied an empty VSchema.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   DatabaseDatabase proxy and connection pooler

   Contributing factor

   Unpinned versionOverlapping failuresAutomation amplification

   Detection

   Inbox Heartbeat Anomaly alarms fired in the US region at 19:40 UTC and declared an incident; engineers and an incident commander acknowledged it at 19:41 UTC.

   Remediation

   • PlanetScale engineers reapplied a VSchema snapshot from one hour before the incident
   • Removed the artifacts left behind by the failed MoveTables workflow
   • Rolled Vitess back to v21

   Action items

   • PlanetScale to deploy a fix for the Vitess v22 regression
   • Pause further database upgrades for Intercom until the patch is verified
   • Find the source of the packet drops in the provider's Kubernetes networking
   • Explore safeguards that protect the application from invalid topology updates
   • Review the pipeline configuration that let a branch unfreeze trigger a pending version upgrade
   • Separate maintenance tasks from version upgrades more strictly so every deployment is intended

   View case
2. IL-0316 Railway's control plane slowed and deployments stopped after a PgBouncer version jump used abnormal CPU and memory

   Railway2025

   Symptoms

   At 11:48 UTC on 22 September 2025, minutes after Railway had resolved a dashboard outage, its control plane showed abnormal resource consumption and elevated API latency. A large backlog of deployments queued during the first outage had started all at once, and the control plane began returning elevated database errors.

   High latencyIntermittent timeoutsDeploys failing

   Trigger

   After a dashboard outage caused by a schema change was fixed, a large backlog of queued deployments started at the same time and put the control plane and its database, behind a newly upgraded PgBouncer, under heavy load.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   DatabaseDatabase proxy and connection pooler

   Contributing factor

   Unpinned versionNo staged rolloutMonitoring blind spotUnreviewed defaults

   Detection

   Users reported at 11:05 UTC that the project canvas failed to load; the control plane's abnormal resource consumption and elevated API latency were seen at 11:48 UTC and opened as a new incident.

   Remediation

   • Deployed a fix for the API failure caused by the schema change within 15 minutes
   • Suspended deployments for non-Pro users so Pro users could deploy and the queue could drain
   • Suspended all deployments, Pro included, for up to 20 minutes during peak instability
   • Scaled up the control plane database's CPU, memory, connection limits and IOPS
   • Rolled PgBouncer back to the previous stable version, which brought all metrics back to nominal
   • Re-enabled deployments for all non-Pro users
   • Fixed the edge case in which private networks and their endpoints were missing from the dashboard

   Action items

   • Re-engineer parts of the control plane to be more resilient, moving large parts of its storage layer away from Postgres
   • Add CI validation that keeps disruptive schema changes out of production and automated schema compatibility checks before backend deployments
   • Monitor and alert on PgBouncer node CPU, memory and connection pool utilization
   • Upgrade PgBouncer in phases, instance by instance, instead of everywhere at once

   Lessons

   Railway believes that without the breaking schema change reaching production the cascade would not have happened, that monitoring PgBouncer's own CPU, memory and pool metrics would have shown the performance regression earlier and shortened recovery, and that upgrading PgBouncer instances one at a time would have exposed the version-specific problem before it reached every instance.

   View case
3. IL-0498 Clerk's Postgres database had load spikes every 15 minutes and requests failed and slowed intermittently for four days

   Clerk2025

   Symptoms

   At 13:08 UTC on 15 September 2025, Clerk's internal monitoring alerted on significant request failures and increased latency. Over the following days the request failures and latency spikes kept coming back while the Postgres database stayed unhealthy, with repeated spikes in database load.

   High error rateHigh latencyDatabase overloadConnection pool exhaustion

   Trigger

   At 05:30 UTC on 14 September 2025 the cloud provider automatically upgraded Clerk's Postgres database to a new minor version, which changed how Postgres handled connection locks.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   DatabaseDatabase proxy and connection pooler

   Contributing factor

   Unpinned versionRetry stormMonitoring blind spotOverlapping failuresHarmful manual action

   Detection

   Internal monitoring alerted on significant request failures and increased latency at 13:08 UTC on 15 September. Shortly after the upgrade on 14 September it had already shown an increased but still acceptable database load.

   Remediation

   • Optimised several expensive queries, refined critical indexes and re-indexed the database
   • Blocked abusive traffic more aggressively for a time
   • Performed a manual minor version upgrade and increased database capacity
   • Added jitter to the connection pooling configuration so connections no longer recycled in step

   Action items

   • Evaluate other database providers that give more control over upgrades and downgrades
   • Isolate more services from each other, for example Sign Up and Sign In infrastructure from the rest of the system
   • Keep optimising the most costly database queries
   • Evaluate sharding and multi-tenant infrastructure to isolate one application from others

   Lessons

   Clerk's review found that connection metrics sampled every 60 seconds could not show a recycling pattern that lasted seconds and repeated every 15 minutes, that an attack and background jobs with similar periods pulled attention away from the database layer, that the Backend API looked healthy only because it manages far fewer connections, and that the release freeze removed the staggering of connection creation that normal deploys provide.

   View case
4. IL-0308 Most RevenueCat backend systems failed after cutover to a new Aurora PostgreSQL 14 cluster as queries became very slow

   RevenueCat2022

   Symptoms

   At 9:34 UTC on November 23, 2022, RevenueCat started moving traffic from its Aurora PostgreSQL 10.x cluster to a new Aurora PostgreSQL 14.x cluster. By 9:39 UTC all traffic was on the new cluster, latency was bad, and the RevenueCat dashboard and the endpoints used by the RevenueCat SDK stopped working.

   Database overloadHigh latencyService outageConnection pool exhaustion

   Trigger

   At 9:34 UTC production traffic was switched from the Aurora PostgreSQL 10.x cluster to the new Aurora PostgreSQL 14.x cluster, before ANALYZE had run on its largest tables.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   DatabasePostgreSQL vacuumDatabase replicationDatabase proxy and connection poolerQuery planner and table statistics

   Contributing factor

   Unrepresentative stagingUnverified assumptionAutomation amplificationMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   At 9:39 UTC, with all traffic on the new cluster, latency looked bad and the infrastructure team began to investigate.

   Remediation

   • Added a statement timeout to the database user so queries could not hold a connection too long
   • Shed 90% of traffic by returning 503s from the load balancer
   • Dropped indexes that the planner was using wrongly and that were not needed
   • Stopped accepting Apple webhooks for a time
   • Rolled out a release without New Relic to stop its EXPLAIN queries
   • Ran ANALYZE by hand on the biggest tables
   • Raised the values of the affected primary key sequences with a prepared script
   • Stopped the integration event dispatcher by hand
   • Replayed the webhooks that were dispatched but not recorded
   • Restored integration event dispatching, ETLs and other non-web server jobs

   Action items

   • Consider change freezes during business-critical periods
   • Explain better how the SDK behaves during backend outages
   • Tell customers about maintenance and outages in the developer dashboard and by direct email to technical contacts
   • Replay a subset of write traffic in migration dry runs to mimic the cutover
   • Move costly processes to asynchronous work to keep the API fast and stable
   • Re-evaluate table indexes, including unused ones the database may choose for queries
   • Show the load of each endpoint and system in the database dashboards
   • Involve support and customer communications staff during outages

   Lessons

   The new cluster had not been analyzed, and the tests missed it because the test cluster had been up long enough to gather statistics. Dry runs replayed no write traffic, on the belief that writes are simpler than reads, and the team assumed sequence state was replicated with the data. Rolling back at the start would have been better than fixing forward. The migration, timed to finish before Thanksgiving and Black Friday, should have been delayed until the week after, because the US had entered a sensitive period and part of the US support team was already on holiday.

   View case

By root cause1