Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    About an hour after LootLocker cut over from a managed database provider to its own MySQL deployment on 2026-04-28, data anomalies showed up in production. A small window of writes made shortly before the migration, spanning 2026-04-19 to 2026-04-20, had never reached the new database, and the service stayed degraded for about three hours after the cutover.

    Trigger

    On 2026-04-20 at about 16:20 BST, a routine credential rotation, made as part of an unrelated configuration fix, changed the credentials that the temporary replication process used for its database connection, and the process crashed.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Data anomalies were detected in production at about 11:30 BST, about an hour after the cutover.

    Remediation
    • Restored normal service behaviour first and deferred the root cause analysis
    • Requested a restore of the deleted source database from the previous provider
    • Replayed the affected records for impacted users from the restored source database
    Action items
    • Perform technical changes of comparable risk in a scheduled maintenance window instead of as live cutovers
    • Require a pre-cutover checklist that verifies replication or sync processes are live and caught up just before cutover
    • Require an explicit downstream impact review for credential rotations of service accounts used by long-running processes
    • Keep source systems until integrity in the target has been independently verified after cutover
    • Publish planned maintenance and migration notices in the in-product News feed as well as Discord, with clear impact statements and more advance notice
    Lessons

    The failure was a silent side effect of an unrelated change made eight days earlier: the replication process recovered and kept working, so there was no signal that data had been dropped, and a pre-cutover integrity check would have caught it. Deleting the source database before validating the new one made recovery much harder. Choosing a live migration to avoid downtime left no clean point to verify integrity, and the resulting degradation and two days of piecemeal recovery far exceeded what a short planned maintenance window would have cost. The announcement on Discord was not clear enough about the impact and came with too little notice.

  2. Symptoms

    On Sunday 25 October 2020 the GoCardless API, dashboard, payment pages and partner integrations were all unavailable for 22 minutes, from 07:32 to 07:54 GMT. Automated monitoring paged the on-call engineer at 07:32, a minute after every request to the API had started failing because no healthy backend was left.

    Trigger

    At 07:22 the TLS certificate Vault was still serving expired. cert-manager had already renewed it, but Vault does not load a new certificate without a restart or a SIGHUP.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Automated monitoring detected the failing requests and paged the on-call engineer at 07:32. Certificate expiry monitoring existed for the Layer-7 load balancers but did not cover the TCP load balancer that Vault uses.

    Remediation
    • Forced cert-manager to recreate the Vault certificate
    • Restarted the Vault cluster by hand so it loaded the new certificate
    • Deleted some pods of critical workloads to skip their 5-minute exponential backoff
    Action items
    • Check the certificate of the TCP load balancer in front of Vault with the Blackbox exporter, as for the Layer-7 load balancers
    • Deploy the Reloader controller to roll Vault when its certificate data changes
    • Change theatre-envconsul so envconsul no longer manages the child process and only injects secrets at container startup
    Lessons

    A system that almost every service depends on, such as the secrets store, can take everything down at once, and failure scenarios like Vault becoming unreachable had not been tested enough. Assuming the certificate had expired, when it had been renewed but not reloaded, added a slow and unnecessary recreation step to the recovery.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve cert-manager and Database. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1