Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

1. IL-0591 Gitpod workspaces in all regions became IO bound and unresponsive for days after the ws39 workspace cluster release

   Gitpod2022

   Symptoms

   From April 11, 2022 at 13:17 UTC customers and Gitpod staff reported that Gitpod workspaces were intermittently becoming unresponsive. CPU usage of nodes and pods looked normal, with nothing maxed out, and at 13:58 UTC the team found that the workspaces were IO bound rather than CPU bound.

   Throughput degradationSustained high node CPUNode NotReadyData loss

   Trigger

   The ws39 generation of workspace clusters, released to all regional clusters on April 8th at 20:08 UTC and to the XL clusters on April 9th at 17:45 UTC, split the 1TB disk into smaller RAID0 disks, changed CPU limiting and workspace networking, and moved to faster machine types.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Node root diskContainer CPU limit

   Contributing factor

   No staged rolloutGap in automated testsUnrepresentative stagingUnknown limitOverlapping failuresIneffective rollbackHarmful manual actionLimited debug access

   Detection

   Customers and Gitpod staff reported on April 11th at 13:17 UTC that workspaces were intermittently unresponsive, and the team opened an incident in Slack through its incident.io integration. On April 17th the team noticed increased CPU load on the workspace nodes and opened an internal incident.

   Remediation

   • Shifted workspace starts back to the ws38 clusters on April 11th
   • Built ws39a clusters with c2d machines and local SSDs and moved traffic to them
   • Requested a limit increase from Let's Encrypt
   • Routed EU XL traffic to the regional EU cluster and built ws-eu39bxl to replace the crashed ws-eu39xl
   • Cleaned up workspaces stuck in a stopping state so users could start them again
   • Released ws40 with 1TB boot disks to get more IO bandwidth
   • Removed the workspaces that consumed excessive CPU time for crypto-mining
   • Blocked the fraudulent users behind the crypto-mining from using Gitpod
   • Rolled back the ws-daemon change that broke CPU limiting and shipped the fix in the ws34 clusters
   • Blocked ACME HTTP requests to workspace ports so Let's Encrypt rate limits would not be hit again
   • Rolled out IO limiting with the ws41xl and ws41 clusters and moved traffic to them step by step

   Action items

   • Invest in test automation so that test results stop releases like this one
   • Vary the interval between traffic shifts to new clusters, with more time for larger releases
   • Add a risk assessment stage, to be automated, that governs changeset size and rollout speed of workspace cluster rollouts
   • Reduce the impact teams have on each other
   • Add review criteria that find backwards incompatible changes before pull requests are merged, and split such pull requests
   • Recommend rollback as the primary means of mitigation in the incident procedures, and look at automating it
   • Make the status page show the workspace service as down when it is, and update the playbooks
   • Keep incident communication in a single Slack channel and Google Meet
   • Put 10% of the engineering staff on the on-call rotation from May 9th and use that time on observability, alerting and stability

   Lessons

   Gitpod concluded that it should have committed to rolling back on April 11th instead of building and shipping fixes, which kept customers on degraded workspaces longer than necessary. A large release so soon after the previous one needed a risk assessment and slower traffic shifts, and backwards incompatible changes that block a rollback need to be found before pull requests are merged. Failure-free operations require experience with failure.

   View case
2. IL-0213 Roblox was down for 73 hours because key-value writes on its single Consul cluster slowed from under 300 ms to 2 seconds

   Roblox2021

   Symptoms

   On the afternoon of 28 October 2021 (13:37 PST), Vault performance at Roblox degraded and a single Consul server showed high CPU load. Consul cluster metrics showed that writes to its key-value (KV) store had a 50th percentile latency of 2 seconds instead of the usual under 300 ms. Players were not yet affected.

   High latencySustained high node CPUService outageMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   On 27 October at 14:00, one day before the outage, Roblox enabled the Consul streaming feature on the backend service responsible for traffic routing and, to prepare for end-of-year traffic, added 50% more nodes to traffic routing.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Coordination and key-value storeService discoveryIn-memory cache

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureOverlapping failuresMonitoring blind spotHarmful manual actionChange with a delayed effect

   Detection

   Roblox engineers began investigating when Vault performance degraded and a single Consul server had high CPU load, before players were affected. Consul cluster metrics then showed elevated KV write latency.

   Remediation

   • Replaced one Consul cluster node on the suspicion of degraded hardware
   • Replaced all Consul nodes with 128-core machines with faster NVMe SSDs
   • Shut down the Consul cluster and reset its state from a snapshot taken at the start of the outage, with access blocked by iptables
   • Blocked external traffic, disabled all non-essential Consul use, scaled services down and lowered health check frequency from 60 seconds to 10 minutes
   • Moved the Consul cluster back to 64-core servers
   • Disabled the streaming feature for all Consul systems, which brought KV write latency back to 300ms
   • Kept the slow Consul servers from staying elected as leader
   • Redeployed the caching system and fixed its wrong scheduling data and failed deployments
   • Restarted the stopped services at the right capacity levels
   • Let players back in with DNS steering in roughly 10% steps while checking database load, cache performance and stability

   Action items

   • HashiCorp builds laboratory benchmarks and scale tests that reproduce the streaming contention
   • HashiCorp improves the design of streaming so it does not contend under extreme load
   • Compact the BoltDB database with existing BoltDB tooling
   • Remove the circular dependency between the telemetry systems and Consul
   • Extend telemetry with targeted alerts on Consul and BoltDB performance and with visibility into traffic between services and Consul
   • Run the backend in an additional, geographically distinct data center and in multiple availability zones
   • Split critical services into their own dedicated Consul clusters
   • Move data that core services keep directly in the Consul KV store to a more suitable storage system
   • Delete obsolete KV data from Consul
   • Upgrade to a Consul version that replaces BoltDB with bbolt, in Q1
   • Redesign cache deployment so the cache system can be brought up quickly from a standing start
   • Deploy Nomad enhancements that make it easier to turn up large jobs after a long period of unavailability
   • Use mechanisms for faster machine configuration changes
   • Reintroduce streaming only after a new implementation has been tested at Roblox's scale and workload

   Lessons

   Two mostly unrelated problems deep inside Consul, contention in streaming under very high read and write load and BoltDB freelist growth, were hard to diagnose, and that difficulty was the main reason the outage lasted so long. A single Consul cluster serving every workload made the impact larger, and monitoring that depended on Consul hid the cause when it was needed most. Faster hardware did not help and may have hurt, because the contention was worse on NUMA machines. HashiCorp had benchmarked streaming at a similar scale, but the problem needed both a large number of streams and a high churn rate. Restarting a platform from a fully stopped state, including warming caches, took a long time and needed tools built for bootstrapping rather than incremental change.

   View case
3. IL-0241 A database shard could not elect a new primary, and the Stripe API failed most requests in two periods on one day

   Stripe2019

   Symptoms

   On 10 July 2019 the Stripe API failed a substantial majority of requests twice, from 16:35 to 17:02 UTC and from 21:14 to 22:47 UTC. In the first period automated monitoring detected within a minute that a database cluster had failed to elect a new primary.

   High error rateFailover failureWrites rejectedIntermittent timeoutsSustained high node CPU

   Trigger

   The primary node of a database cluster failed at 16:35 UTC while one shard had several stalled nodes. The second period was set off by rolling the election protocol back to the previous minor version at 20:42 UTC.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   DatabaseDatabase failover manager

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectMonitoring blind spotExcessive blast radiusHarmful manual actionUnverified assumptionOverlapping failures

   Detection

   Automated monitoring detected the failed election within a minute, and the team was alerted at 16:36 UTC. The second period was announced at 21:14 UTC by automated alerts that some shards in the cluster were unavailable.

   Remediation

   • Restarted all nodes of the database cluster, which forced a successful primary election
   • Updated the production configuration and restarted the database cluster's nodes
   • Ramped traffic back up, putting services for user-initiated API requests first

   Action items

   • Alert when nodes stop reporting their replication lag
   • Alert when a shard enters a state that could trigger the election fault
   • Work with the database maintainers on a fix for the underlying fault
   • Add circuit breaking on failed operations to particular database clusters
   • Use fault isolation to contain the impact of a single failed shard
   • Limit the resources used by clients that keep retrying failed requests
   • Add procedures and tooling that make rapid configuration changes during incident response safer

   View case

By root cause2