Cases30 cases

6 to 10 of 30

1. IL-0147 AKS nodes behind an HTTP proxy failed to provision with CSE exit code 31 on 202508 node images, because a refactoring stopped the proxy from being used when downloading uncached Kubernetes binaries

   Microsoft Azure2025

   Symptoms

   Creating or scaling a node pool on AKS 1.31.8 failed: the VMSS instances never finished provisioning. This started after planned maintenance moved the node image from 202507.* to 202508.*, in a cluster where nodes must send all outbound traffic through an internal HTTP/HTTPS proxy and direct egress is blocked. It happened with both Ubuntu and AzureLinux images.

   Scale-up failureUpgrade stall

   Trigger

   A node image auto-upgrade from 202507.* to 202508.* during planned maintenance, on clusters whose Kubernetes patch version was not pre-cached in the new image.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Node operating system imageNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Cache-masked failureAutomation amplification

   Detection

   The customer saw VMSS instance provisioning fail with a vmssCSE error in the VMSS activity logs and reported it as a GitHub issue.

   Remediation

   • The customer pinned the node image to a 202507.* snapshot on clusters running 1.31.8
   • The customer upgraded clusters to AKS 1.31.9 or 1.31.10, whose binaries are cached in the 202508.* images
   • The AKS team hot-patched VHD 20250811 so the proxy configuration is used for uncached binary downloads and made it globally available in public regions on 2025-09-04; it also announced the hotfix for VHD 20250820
   • The AKS team told users to reimage their nodes with az aks nodepool upgrade --node-image-only to pick up the hotfixed image

   Action items

   • Apply the proxy fix in all future VHDs

   Lessons

   A bootstrap path that runs only when an artefact is missing from a cache is easy to break without noticing: here only clusters on Kubernetes versions not pre-cached in the node image ever downloaded binaries, so only they met the proxy regression. Testing node provisioning behind a mandatory egress proxy, on older patch versions as well as the newest, would exercise that path. For clusters with restricted egress, pinning the node image or moving to a Kubernetes version cached in the image were both quick workarounds while the fix was shipped.

   View case
2. IL-0347 About 25% of Scaleway FR-PAR-1 hypervisors lost VPC connectivity when both VPC BGP route reflectors got stuck

   Scaleway2024

   Symptoms

   On 18 October 2024, from 7:50 to 8:01 UTC, about 25% of the hypervisors in Scaleway's FR-PAR-1 availability zone lost VPC connectivity with the rest of the region, and products that use VPC failed with them. Public internet connectivity and Elastic Metal VPC connectivity were not affected.

   Network unreachablePacket lossNode NotReady

   Trigger

   At 6:20 UTC a Top of Rack switch in FR-PAR-1 had a software crash. One of the two BGP route reflectors for VPC ran on a hypervisor in that rack and was left in an abnormal state.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)BGP routingNetwork switchDatabaseManaged Kubernetes control plane and provider API

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusAutomation amplification

   Detection

   Health-check monitoring on both route reflectors detected the anomaly, and the Scaleway Customer Excellence and SRE teams detected the customer impact and opened an incident.

   Remediation

   • Fixed both VPC route reflectors by manual action

   Action items

   • Fixed the autohealing mechanism that had failed to fix route reflectors stuck in a stale state; the fix is https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/17163
   • Run different software versions on the route reflectors so a single bug cannot stop several instances
   • Investigate the software issue that left the route reflectors in a stale state

   View case
3. IL-0495 HubSpot's internal load balancers on Kubernetes were falsely marked unhealthy and the rest collapsed under the traffic

   HubSpot2024

   Symptoms

   Between 14:20 and 15:16 UTC on 27 August 2024, some HubSpot customers could not log in to their accounts, reach their content or use HubSpot tools. Requests were slow or failed because HubSpot's internal load balancers, which run on Kubernetes and spread traffic across the backend services, were overloaded.

   Probe failuresHigh latencyHigh error rate

   Trigger

   Routine operation of a critical component of HubSpot's traffic management system, from about 14:08 UTC, ran path handling updates in the load balancer stack, and an issue in that stack made those updates block health check responses.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Ingress controllerLiveness and readiness probes

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationNo headroom

   Detection

   Monitoring detected widespread performance degradation across the platform at 14:23 UTC and the incident response team was mobilised. HubSpot says it had identified the issue internally by 14:20 UTC. The status page was not updated until 14:44 UTC, which left customers with outdated information.

   Remediation

   • Tried to increase the capacity of the remaining load balancer instances
   • Brought new load balancer instances online, which relieved the pressure and let traffic return to normal

   Action items

   • Change the health check configuration so health checks do not time out falsely
   • Redesign the health check system so health checks get priority and keep running during operations such as configuration updates
   • Increase the capacity of the load balancers for sudden traffic spikes
   • Change the load balancing architecture to detect traffic surges earlier and distribute load dynamically in real time
   • Update the status page automatically for large-scale outages
   • Integrate the monitoring systems more tightly with the communication tools
   • Expand load testing to simulate high-traffic scenarios
   • Introduce chaos engineering to test platform resilience regularly
   • Add traffic pattern metrics, including the ratio of current connections to the maximum allowed
   • Add auto-scaling that adjusts resource capacity to traffic patterns

   Lessons

   HubSpot concluded that earlier detection of the abnormal traffic surge could have prevented the cascading failure, and that health checks have to keep running during operations such as configuration updates so that working load balancers are not removed together. The late status page update caused confusion for customers.

   View case
4. IL-0182 Too few CoreDNS replicas on EKS were overloaded during traffic spikes, raising latency and cutting the network for task pods, and the over-provisioned, tightly spread CoreDNS pods added later blocked Karpenter consolidation

   이언철2024

   Symptoms

   When traffic changed sharply, CoreDNS came under heavy load, and the cluster saw network problems and a sudden rise in latency. The horizontal pod autoscaler then added pods, database connections surged, and the impact spread to the whole service.

   High latencyIntermittent connection failuresAutoscaler misbehaviour

   Trigger

   Sharp changes in traffic loaded the small number of CoreDNS pods beyond what they could handle.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   CoreDNSKarpenterHorizontal pod autoscalerPod scheduling and placement

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationHarmful manual action

   Remediation

   • Set up the Cluster Proportional Autoscaler for CoreDNS with nodesPerReplica and coresPerReplica chosen for the instance types in use
   • Spread CoreDNS with soft topologySpreadConstraints (ScheduleAnyway) instead of anti-affinity so Karpenter could consolidate nodes
   • Added alert thresholds on CoreDNS error rate, panics, request duration and request rate
   • Deployed NodeLocal DNSCache so each node answers DNS from a local cache and forwards misses to the main CoreDNS

   Lessons

   A fixed, small number of CoreDNS pods cannot follow a cluster whose nodes and pods change quickly with traffic, and the damage spreads: DNS latency triggers autoscaling, which in turn floods the database with connections. Simply adding many CoreDNS replicas created a different problem, because with tainted nodes and a maxSkew: 1 spread constraint the pods piled onto a few nodes and blocked Karpenter consolidation. Scaling CoreDNS in proportion to the cluster and putting a DNS cache on every node handled both.

   View case
5. IL-0021 GKE GPU nodes on Container-Optimized OS could not download NVIDIA drivers (403 Forbidden) and came up without working GPUs

   Google Cloud2024

   Symptoms

   From 08:00 US/Pacific on 12 March 2024, GKE GPU nodes running Container-Optimized OS (COS) that were newly created or recreated came up with GPU drivers that did not work, so workloads that used the GPUs could not run. GKE showed elevated errors.

   GPU unavailableNode NotReady

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   GPU driverNode operating system imageNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplification

   Detection

   The report does not say how Google detected the issue. Affected users saw "Failed to download GPU driver installer, status: 403 Forbidden" on the GPU node when installing the driver.

   Remediation

   • Halted automatic node recreations, which attempt GPU driver downloads, until the issue was mitigated
   • Worked with the driver partner to resolve access to the driver download bucket

   Lessons

   The status page report states no lessons or follow-up actions.

   View case

By root cause8