Cases25 cases

21 to 25 of 25

1. IL-0011 HAProxy ingress piled requests onto the same pods because a Go template visited the backend map in sorted pod IP order

   Skyscanner2019

   Symptoms

   On a Sunday, a team using one of Skyscanner's Kubernetes clusters manually paged the out-of-hours Kubernetes support because their service showed elevated latency, worst at the p90 and maximum levels.

   High latencyLoad imbalanceOOMKilledIntermittent connection failures

   Trigger

   Upgrading the HAProxy ingress controller to v0.6 and going back from Service virtual IPs to individual pod IPs as backends, on the understanding that the sort-backends flag introduced in v0.5, false by default, meant backends were randomly shuffled.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Ingress controllerHAProxyConfiguration templating

   Contributing factor

   Unrepresentative stagingUnverified assumptionIgnored early signal

   Detection

   A cluster user manually paged the out-of-hours Kubernetes support about elevated latency; Prometheus queries then showed the uneven request distribution across pods.

   Remediation

   • switched the affected service from pod IPs back to the Service virtual IP through a config change in the internal deployment tool Slingshot
   • patched the controller to keep each backend's servers in an insertion-ordered slice and changed the template to iterate over that slice
   • tested the patch in sandbox clusters and rolled it out to the production clusters

   Action items

   • Run the internal controller patch in production and return to pod IPs as the default backends
   • Raise the problem upstream with a GitHub issue and pull request
   • Test changes to cluster components against the specific behaviour and conditions that matter

   Lessons

   The team already knew that sorted backends cause hot-podding and still did not test the new flag well enough to see that it did not work; changes to cluster components need tests aimed at the exact behaviour that matters, under conditions like production. A keyword can behave differently in different parts of a language: range over a map is unordered in Go code but sorted in text/template. A small cluster component can do outsized harm to every user of the cluster and, in the end, to customers.

   View case
2. IL-0014 A GKE upgrade to a withdrawn version stalled on slow drains and a stuck node pool, then broke an ingress and confused the HPA

   loveholidays2019

   Symptoms

   On the evening of a long-overdue upgrade of a loveholidays production GKE cluster from 1.10.X to 1.12.5-gke.10, planned to take 2 to 2.5 hours, the master upgrade and the first two 7-node NodePools went smoothly. After that the NodePool upgrades slowed to a crawl. Each node is cordoned, drained and upgraded in turn. Even a 14-node cluster at about 5 minutes per node took over an hour, and with about 100 more nodes to go, some of them taking over 15 minutes to drain, the sequential drains were too slow to finish at a reasonable hour.

   Upgrade stallPods PendingScale-up failureService outageAutoscaler misbehaviour

   Trigger

   A manual upgrade of the GKE masters and NodePools from 1.10.X to 1.12.5-gke.10, two versions at once, on 19 March 2019; GKE's release notes of 14 March had already said that version was no longer available for new clusters or master upgrades because masters showed elevated error rates, but it could still be selected.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   GKE control planeNode poolCluster autoscalerIngress controllerHorizontal pod autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   Unrepresentative stagingOverlapping failuresIgnored early signal

   Detection

   The slow drains, zombie nodes and stuck NodePool were seen by the engineer running the upgrade; the broken Ingress was noticed after the upgrade and explained by Google support; the HPA problem was noticed the next day.

   Remediation

   • drained the remaining NodePool nodes ahead of the upgrade with kubectl drain --ignore-daemonsets --delete-local-data
   • deleted the zombie instances from the managed instance group with gcloud compute instance-groups managed delete-instances
   • cancelled the stuck UPGRADE_NODES operation with gcloud beta container operations cancel
   • used kubectl port-forward in place of the broken internal Ingresses
   • scaled down the older of two active ReplicaSets, or triggered a dummy deployment, to bring the HPA back

   Action items

   • Alert when a HorizontalPodAutoscaler is at 70% and at 100% of its capacity
   • Alert when a deployment has had two active ReplicaSets for 30 minutes and for 60 minutes
   • Re-evaluate termination grace periods that were set to arbitrary large values
   • Read the GKE release notes before every cluster upgrade
   • Use auto-upgrade in non-production environments, and manual cluster upgrades with automatic node upgrades in production
   • Keep environments as identical as possible, including resource names

   Lessons

   Read the release notes before upgrading: the target version had been withdrawn five days earlier. Drain time depends on pod configuration, so emptyDir volumes, long grace periods and missing disruption budgets turn a NodePool upgrade into hours. Pre-production only catches problems like the ingress bug if it matches production down to resource names. Auto-upgrades in non-production surface problems early, and a mix of manual cluster upgrades and automatic node upgrades in production keeps clusters current without much effort.

   View case
3. IL-0054 All ingress traffic lost while draining a GKE node pool because the load balancer only targeted new nodes without ingress-nginx pods

   DevOps Hof2019

   Symptoms

   While the old nodes of a GKE cluster were being drained to move workloads to a newly created node pool, none of the services in the cluster could be reached through ingress-nginx any more.

   Service outageProbe failures

   Trigger

   Cordoning and draining the old node pool removed those nodes from the GCP load balancer backend while the ingress-nginx pods were still running on them.

   Root cause

   Operator error

   Component

   Ingress controllerkube-proxyNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnverified assumption

   Detection

   The team noticed during the drain that no service in the cluster was reachable through ingress-nginx.

   Remediation

   • deleted the nginx-ingress-controller pods still running on the old nodes so they were rescheduled on the new, ready nodes

   Lessons

   With externalTrafficPolicy: Local, the load balancer can only reach nodes that run an ingress pod, and cordoned nodes leave the load balancer backend immediately; if the ingress pods stay behind on cordoned nodes, all ingress traffic stops. Before any change that might touch traffic, look twice into the documentation.

   View case
4. IL-0031 Kubernetes API server OOM-killed, leaving the Skipper ingress without routes; the talk points to a misconfigured CronJob manifest

   Zalando2018

   Symptoms

   Customers were affected, and Zalando's IAM service answered requests with HTTP 404. The talk shows this on slides titled "Customer impact" and "IAM returning 404", followed by a slide on the number of pods in the cluster.

   High error rateControl plane unresponsiveOOMKilled

   Trigger

   A CronJob (apiVersion batch/v2alpha1, schedule "*/15 9-19 * * Mon-Fri") whose concurrencyPolicy: Forbid and job history limits sat inside the pod template spec instead of the CronJob spec. The talk shows it right after the slides on the number of pods and the API server being OOM-killed, and the lessons add a quota on the number of pods.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Kubernetes API serverIngress controller

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureExcessive blast radius

   Remediation

   • fixed the CronJob manifest: moved concurrencyPolicy: Forbid and the job history limits to the CronJob spec, added activeDeadlineSeconds: 120 and changed the schedule to "7 8-18 * * Mon-Fri"

   Action items

   • Make the ingress stay healthy during API server problems
   • Make the ingress keep the last known set of routes
   • Use a ResourceQuota on the number of pods (the example sets pods: "1500")

   Lessons

   An AWS ALB routes traffic to all hosts when all hosts report unhealthy, so the ingress should stay healthy during API server problems. An ingress controller that reads routes from the API server should keep its last known set of routes. Use a quota for the number of pods.

   View case
5. IL-0072 High etcd write latency made the API servers return stale data, and the production cluster flipped between two views of its state

   Nordstrom2017

   Symptoms

   A user reported that pods were starting up and then vanishing. When the cluster operators looked, kubectl get pods and kubectl get nodes returned two different sets of data that alternated back and forth, as if there were two opinions of the cluster's state.

   Stale or inconsistent API readsStale endpoint routingService outage

   Trigger

   etcd write latency rose far above the healthy single-digit milliseconds; the speakers say trouble starts once the database sync time crosses double digits or several hundred milliseconds.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   etcdKubernetes API serverIngress controllerPersistent volumes and stateful sets

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaults

   Detection

   A user reported pods starting up and vanishing.

   Remediation

   • restored service on a replacement cluster
   • freed persistent volumes from the old cluster one by one so they could bind in the new cluster
   • updated DNS records that pointed at the old cluster's load balancer names

   Action items

   • Make the Kubernetes API server request quorum reads from etcd

   Lessons

   etcd is extremely sensitive to write latency; once the database sync time crosses double digits of milliseconds, stale reads or badly degraded performance follow. Without quorum reads, a consistent store can still hand out stale data. Documentation for a fast-moving system changes, so read it again regularly. Moving workloads to a new cluster is hard when they hold persistent volumes or when DNS records point at generated load balancer names.

   View case

By root cause8