Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

1. IL-0400 Public sector sites across Wales lost connectivity for over 8 hours as a PE router wrongly advertised a default route

   PSBA2026

   Symptoms

   On 25 March 2026 from about 16:40, public sector organisations on the PSBA network across Wales lost connectivity at their sites. The Service Desk saw about 400 alerts at 16:58, when a Major Incident was declared, about 1,500 at 17:05 and about 5,000 across Wales at 17:08, while councils, a fire and rescue service and Natural Resources Wales phoned in to report sites down.

   Network unreachableIntermittent connection failuresLink flapping

   Trigger

   At 16:30 a route map change was applied, outside formal change control, on a PSBA core Provider Edge (PE) router to leak MPLS VPN routes, so that legacy Capita-operated UPS devices in a /16 subnet could be managed by BT/PSBA. The change was removed at 16:40.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   BGP routing

   Contributing factor

   Ineffective rollbackMissed in reviewLimited debug accessOverlapping failures

   Detection

   At 16:57 Mid Wales Fire & Rescue Service phoned in a loss of connectivity at its Presteigne site, and at 16:58 a case was opened in Service Now for a group of about 400 alerts and a Major Incident was declared.

   Remediation

   • Removed the route map change from the PE router at 16:40
   • Changed QoS on the BGP to bring back the management links, after which alarms cleared
   • Cleared routes and reset inbound BGP advertisements, which did not stop the default route being advertised
   • Corrected the configuration issue affecting the internet learned route at 01:02
   • Performed a controlled reload of the affected router at 01:10, which restored customer services and management connectivity

   Action items

   • Reinforce change control requirements with an internal briefing on formal change submission, the risks of unplanned changes and roles during planned and emergency changes
   • Create a dedicated Microsoft Teams channel as the single real-time communication point for all live P1 and Major Incidents
   • Explore disaster recovery and business continuity test exercises for major or P1 incidents
   • During loss of management access, have all technical teams assess customer impact from what reporting organisations provide, captured and shared in real time by the Service Desk and Incident Management
   • Investigate a fixed link between Capital Quarter and the PSBA management racks in Vantage Data Centre at Newport, with dedicated management terminals and two-factor authentication for access outside the secure management platform
   • Improve initial triage with stronger probing questions when incidents are reported and keep reassessing and communicating impact throughout the incident
   • Review the P1 and Major Incident process so escalation criteria and timeframes are clearly defined, and train the Service Desk to recognise and escalate them early
   • Review the PSBA estate for legacy configuration, set processes and timeframes for removing it and add controls so it is not introduced again
   • Review email and SMS distribution lists and processes and reinforce Service Desk training on customer communications during P1 and Major Incidents

   Lessons

   The report names eight lessons: a change was made outside PSBA change control; internal communication during the Major Incident was slow and fragmented; the organisation was not ready for a network-wide incident; losing management access stopped the resolver groups from seeing the network state and customer impact; the resolver groups did not understand customer impact in enough detail, which delayed finding the root cause; escalation to PSBA management was slow; legacy configuration left in the network contributed; and email and SMS communications did not reach some customers in time.

   View case
2. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 3 March 2026, during a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch in a cluster in IONOS Cloud's TXL data center, monitoring alerts fired and the hosts in that cluster lost network connectivity. Customers saw intermittent network degradation or outages, and the Data Center Designer (DCD) web frontend and the AI Model Hub became unreachable.

   Network unreachableLink flappingService outage

   Trigger

   During a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch, Topology 2 of 2 in the affected cluster was disabled as planned, and a link flap on a switch in Topology 1 then flooded the InfiniBand control plane with alerts and started a fabric resweep.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   InfiniBand fabricNetwork control plane (SDN)BGP routingNIC, cable and switch port linkModel hubDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   IONOS began investigating monitoring alerts in TXL; the first status update was posted at 11:36 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Switched from the affected control plane to its standby
   • Rebooted the locked-up gateways
   • Recovered Topology 1 from the scheduled maintenance
   • Paused provisioning in the cluster that had a backlog of queued jobs
   • Re-enabled provisioning once network connectivity improved and watched job execution
   • Re-established connectivity for the systems that support the DCD

   Action items

   • Adjusted the control-plane configuration to use less aggressive failover timers and reduced heavy sweep activity, lowering the load on the forwarding table
   • Reduced the number of multicast group memberships to relieve the forwarding table
   • Set up continuous monitoring of forwarding table use and control-plane memory with alerts before capacity limits are reached
   • Move the control plane to dedicated high-performance servers, separate from data-plane traffic
   • Audit IPv6 configurations and IPoIB driver settings
   • Modernise the interconnect fabric, including switches, gateways and drivers
   • Hardened IAM maintenance protocols so that critical identity services keep working when the primary Cloud APIs are temporarily unavailable
   • Move IAM to a dedicated platform without a dependency on the standard managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Introduce a dedicated provisioning provider for DBaaS and Managed Kubernetes
   • Add automated circuit breakers to the provisioning engine against overload and queue buildup from self-healing services
   • Improve visibility and control over job execution and prioritisation in the provisioning queue
   • Change the provisioning queue architecture to decouple services and reduce spillover

   Lessons

   IONOS identified the linking of services through the shared provisioning queue as a key reason the degradation lasted as long as it did. Alongside making each service more robust, it is decoupling the provisioning queue and addressing dependencies between services to reduce the blast radius of future incidents.

   View case
3. IL-0255 Basecamp's two redundant links between data centers dropped together and a Redis replica resync loop stalled chat

   37signals2020

   Symptoms

   At 11:59AM CDT on Friday 28 August 2020, Basecamp's Ops team received a flood of alerts from PagerDuty, Nagios and Prometheus. Monitoring showed that the newer of the two metro links between the data centers in Ashburn, VA and Chicago, IL had been lost for about 20-30 seconds, and BC3 kept responding slowly after the link came back.

   Link flappingHigh latencyReplication lag

   Trigger

   Both redundant metro links between Basecamp's Ashburn and Chicago data centers dropped for short periods; monitoring showed the newer link down for about 20-30 seconds.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   Backbone network (WAN)BGP routingIn-memory cacheDatabase replication

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureRetry stormSignal buried in noise

   Detection

   A flood of alerts from PagerDuty, Nagios and Prometheus, with monitoring showing the lost metro link. A lingering alert for one Redis DB instance later pointed to the replication problem.

   Remediation

   • Turned chat off at the load balancer layer so the rest of BC3 could stabilise
   • Restarted Redis on the replica that was stuck in the resynchronization loop

   Action items

   • Make the documented Redis configuration changes for the known replication issue
   • Make concrete plans to remove the shared physical path under the two metro links
   • Prove the failover systems in production at peak load
   • Make explicit room for post-incident follow-up work and push other work out

   Lessons

   Planned redundancy and live testing had given Basecamp a false sense of security, especially at peak load: moving between redundant network links or shifting load across data centers should work without issue, and Basecamp would rather find out in a controlled test with the full team ready. The follow-up from an outage needs urgency and explicitly cleared time, not just a place on a list.

   View case

By root cause3