Cases8 cases

1 to 5 of 8

1. IL-0356 Every domain hosted on Railway returned HTTP 404 to new connections for five minutes because route lookups failed

   Railway2026

   Symptoms

   On 30 September 2026, between about 07:35 and 07:40 UTC, new connections to every domain hosted on Railway, both custom domains and *.up.railway.app domains, got HTTP 404 in all regions. Internal alerting paged the on-call team as soon as route lookups started to fail.

   Service outageDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   At 07:29 UTC an engineer merged a change to the routing control plane that contained a database schema update and a new version of the routing service. At about 07:35 the deployment system rolled the new routing service out to every region before the schema update had been applied.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)DatabaseCI system

   Contributing factor

   Unsafe failure behaviourNo staged rolloutExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Internal alerting engaged the on-call response team as soon as route lookups began to fail at about 07:35 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Let the CI system finish the schema update, after which the routing service's retried lookups succeeded and routing recovered without a rollback

   Action items

   • Force the migration rollout to run in serial order and unify the deployment pipeline so deploy order and blast radius are checked before merge
   • Block the routing service's blue/green rollout until the database schema matching its version is in place
   • Add shard based rollouts per region to the distributed control plane to isolate impact

   View case
2. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 3 March 2026, during a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch in a cluster in IONOS Cloud's TXL data center, monitoring alerts fired and the hosts in that cluster lost network connectivity. Customers saw intermittent network degradation or outages, and the Data Center Designer (DCD) web frontend and the AI Model Hub became unreachable.

   Network unreachableLink flappingService outage

   Trigger

   During a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch, Topology 2 of 2 in the affected cluster was disabled as planned, and a link flap on a switch in Topology 1 then flooded the InfiniBand control plane with alerts and started a fabric resweep.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   InfiniBand fabricNetwork control plane (SDN)BGP routingNIC, cable and switch port linkModel hubDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   IONOS began investigating monitoring alerts in TXL; the first status update was posted at 11:36 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Switched from the affected control plane to its standby
   • Rebooted the locked-up gateways
   • Recovered Topology 1 from the scheduled maintenance
   • Paused provisioning in the cluster that had a backlog of queued jobs
   • Re-enabled provisioning once network connectivity improved and watched job execution
   • Re-established connectivity for the systems that support the DCD

   Action items

   • Adjusted the control-plane configuration to use less aggressive failover timers and reduced heavy sweep activity, lowering the load on the forwarding table
   • Reduced the number of multicast group memberships to relieve the forwarding table
   • Set up continuous monitoring of forwarding table use and control-plane memory with alerts before capacity limits are reached
   • Move the control plane to dedicated high-performance servers, separate from data-plane traffic
   • Audit IPv6 configurations and IPoIB driver settings
   • Modernise the interconnect fabric, including switches, gateways and drivers
   • Hardened IAM maintenance protocols so that critical identity services keep working when the primary Cloud APIs are temporarily unavailable
   • Move IAM to a dedicated platform without a dependency on the standard managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Introduce a dedicated provisioning provider for DBaaS and Managed Kubernetes
   • Add automated circuit breakers to the provisioning engine against overload and queue buildup from self-healing services
   • Improve visibility and control over job execution and prioritisation in the provisioning queue
   • Change the provisioning queue architecture to decouple services and reduce spillover

   Lessons

   IONOS identified the linking of services through the shared provisioning queue as a key reason the degradation lasted as long as it did. Alongside making each service more robust, it is decoupling the provisioning queue and addressing dependencies between services to reduce the blast radius of future incidents.

   View case
3. IL-0347 About 25% of Scaleway FR-PAR-1 hypervisors lost VPC connectivity when both VPC BGP route reflectors got stuck

   Scaleway2024

   Symptoms

   On 18 October 2024, from 7:50 to 8:01 UTC, about 25% of the hypervisors in Scaleway's FR-PAR-1 availability zone lost VPC connectivity with the rest of the region, and products that use VPC failed with them. Public internet connectivity and Elastic Metal VPC connectivity were not affected.

   Network unreachablePacket lossNode NotReady

   Trigger

   At 6:20 UTC a Top of Rack switch in FR-PAR-1 had a software crash. One of the two BGP route reflectors for VPC ran on a hypervisor in that rack and was left in an abnormal state.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)BGP routingNetwork switchDatabaseManaged Kubernetes control plane and provider API

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusAutomation amplification

   Detection

   Health-check monitoring on both route reflectors detected the anomaly, and the Scaleway Customer Excellence and SRE teams detected the customer impact and opened an incident.

   Remediation

   • Fixed both VPC route reflectors by manual action

   Action items

   • Fixed the autohealing mechanism that had failed to fix route reflectors stuck in a stale state; the fix is https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/17163
   • Run different software versions on the route reflectors so a single bug cannot stop several instances
   • Investigate the software issue that left the route reflectors in a stale state

   View case
4. IL-0339 Azure Front Door and Azure CDN users saw intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes for hours

   Microsoft Azure2024

   Symptoms

   From 11:45 UTC on 30 July 2024, a subset of customers got intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes when connecting to Microsoft services that use Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN). The Azure Portal team saw the first service degradation at 11:47 UTC.

   Intermittent connection failuresIntermittent timeoutsHigh latencyPacket loss

   Trigger

   Around 11:45 UTC the Azure network DDoS protection service was disengaging after a routine DDoS mitigation and returning traffic to its default routing to AFD, but the routes at one site in Europe could not be updated because the network control plane could not reach that site during a local power outage.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   CDN and edge networkDDoS protection serviceNetwork control plane (SDN)Data center power and cooling

   Contributing factor

   Overlapping failuresExcessive blast radiusMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The Azure Portal team detected service degradation at 11:47 UTC and began to investigate. At 12:10 UTC network monitoring correlated the Portal incident to a network issue at one site in Europe, and networking engineers joined.

   Remediation

   • Rerouted traffic under the standard congestion playbook, which removed most of the impact by 13:58 UTC
   • Ordered the network control plane to reissue its commands to the misbehaving device, which could not be reached
   • Removed the device that kept attracting traffic from the network and scanned the network for other issues

   Action items

   • Add the missing configuration on network devices so a DDoS mitigation issue in one geography cannot spread to another
   • Improve validation and monitoring in the Azure network to detect invalid configurations
   • Improve monitoring for when the DDoS protection service is unreachable from the control plane but still serving traffic

   View case
5. IL-0529 New Google Cloud VMs and other instances came up without network connectivity in all zones after VPC controllers stopped

   Google Cloud2024

   Symptoms

   From 15:22 US/Pacific on 16 May 2024, new VMs and other new instances across Google Cloud came up without network programming, so the new instances could not open network connections, and VMs that were migrated or restarted lost connectivity. Changes to virtual network configuration, such as firewall rules and load balancers, were not applied. Internal monitoring alerted Google engineers at 15:41.

   Network unreachablePacket lossCluster or node provisioning stallScale-up failureHigh error rate

   Trigger

   Google's infrastructure team ran a routine maintenance action meant to shut down one unused VPC Controller in a single Google Cloud zone, and the automation shut down VPC controllers in all zones where the controllers were still in use.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)Cloud load balancerNAT gateway

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectIgnored early signalNo safeguard on destructive changeExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Internal monitoring alerts reached Google engineers at 15:41 US/Pacific, and the investigation started immediately.

   Remediation

   • Paused maintenance operations to prevent the shutdown from repeating
   • Brought the affected VPC Controllers back into a serving state in every zone
   • Stopped the automation responsible for the shutdown until safeguards are in place
   • Recovered partial Apigee proxy deployments by hand
   • Cleaned up VMs left behind by failed Dataproc cluster deletions

   Action items

   • Add safety measures that check that maintenance operations carry correctly scoped zone information
   • Make the underlying tools reject maintenance operations that do not specify zones
   • Tighten on-demand access control so one maintenance invocation cannot work across multiple zones
   • Add safety checks, testing and validation for maintenance operations, including positive and negative test cases for the new safety measures

   View case

By root cause4