Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

1. IL-0234 An onboarding operator deployed without its scope file installed dev applications on other IONOS Kubernetes clusters

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 8 May 2026 IONOS Cloud reported "K8s Control Planes not available": some Managed Kubernetes customers in DE/TXL, DE/FRA and DE/FRA/2 had trouble connecting to the control plane and saw degraded Kubernetes functionality. Between 15:22 and 16:12 (UTC+2) applications meant for a new internal development cluster were installed on other customer clusters, which were also modified.

   Control plane unresponsiveImage pull failures

   Trigger

   A routine internal operation onboarded a new Managed Kubernetes development cluster. The scoping configuration file for the onboarding operator failed to reach the deployment branch because of a merge conflict, and at the same time a second change removed the operator from the exclusion list, which deployed it at once.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   CI systemContainer registry and its credentials

   Contributing factor

   No configuration testsExcessive blast radiusMissed in review

   Remediation

   • Corrected the onboarding operator so it needs an explicit namespace configuration before acting on any cluster
   • Reconfigured the deployment system to fail deployments when required configuration files are missing
   • Rolled back the identified changes on the affected resources
   • Ran a recovery script, validated in staging, that removed all unintended installations and updates from the affected clusters

   Action items

   • Add a mandatory CI/CD step that confirms all required configuration files reached the target branch before any deployment starts
   • Require additional peer review and change management approval for every deployment that touches production, whatever its size
   • Give teams a way to inform each affected customer in time about the status of post-incident cleanup

   Lessons

   IONOS treats the unintended change to cluster configurations as a failure of the controls that should keep internal operations from affecting customer environments.

   View case
2. IL-0464 IONOS Managed Kubernetes control planes went unreachable for minutes at a time as their shared etcd grew and fragmented

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   From 14 to 16 March 2026 a subset of customer control planes on IONOS Managed Kubernetes (MK8s) became unavailable again and again, each time for several minutes. While a cluster was unreachable, operations that depend on the Kubernetes API, such as deployments, scaling and health checks, did not work reliably.

   Control plane unresponsiveImage pull failures

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   etcdKubernetes API serverManaged Kubernetes control plane and provider API

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radius

   Remediation

   • Defragmented the affected database instances, reclaiming about 3–4 GiB per instance
   • Shortened the database compaction intervals on the affected instances
   • Deployed a fix for the affected AI Model Hub database services
   • Applied final changes to all affected clusters

   Action items

   • Expand monitoring dashboards to show control plane health per database instance
   • Move the highest-volume clusters to dedicated database backends
   • Make incidents of this kind trigger immediate paging
   • Roll the updated compaction interval out to all shared control plane database instances
   • Run automated, scheduled defragmentation jobs on all instances
   • Rebalance clusters across database instances to reduce concentration
   • Contact customers whose clusters write disproportionate data, for example to store large security scan reports outside the control plane database
   • Introduce per-tenant resource quotas and key-count limits on the shared control plane database
   • Re-architect the shared control plane for stronger isolation, with dedicated database instances and better vertical scaling
   • Evaluate full database sharding for customers with consistently high data volumes
   • Hold regular drills on database resource exhaustion and recovery

   View case
3. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 3 March 2026, during a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch in a cluster in IONOS Cloud's TXL data center, monitoring alerts fired and the hosts in that cluster lost network connectivity. Customers saw intermittent network degradation or outages, and the Data Center Designer (DCD) web frontend and the AI Model Hub became unreachable.

   Network unreachableLink flappingService outage

   Trigger

   During a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch, Topology 2 of 2 in the affected cluster was disabled as planned, and a link flap on a switch in Topology 1 then flooded the InfiniBand control plane with alerts and started a fabric resweep.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   InfiniBand fabricNetwork control plane (SDN)BGP routingNIC, cable and switch port linkModel hubDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   IONOS began investigating monitoring alerts in TXL; the first status update was posted at 11:36 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Switched from the affected control plane to its standby
   • Rebooted the locked-up gateways
   • Recovered Topology 1 from the scheduled maintenance
   • Paused provisioning in the cluster that had a backlog of queued jobs
   • Re-enabled provisioning once network connectivity improved and watched job execution
   • Re-established connectivity for the systems that support the DCD

   Action items

   • Adjusted the control-plane configuration to use less aggressive failover timers and reduced heavy sweep activity, lowering the load on the forwarding table
   • Reduced the number of multicast group memberships to relieve the forwarding table
   • Set up continuous monitoring of forwarding table use and control-plane memory with alerts before capacity limits are reached
   • Move the control plane to dedicated high-performance servers, separate from data-plane traffic
   • Audit IPv6 configurations and IPoIB driver settings
   • Modernise the interconnect fabric, including switches, gateways and drivers
   • Hardened IAM maintenance protocols so that critical identity services keep working when the primary Cloud APIs are temporarily unavailable
   • Move IAM to a dedicated platform without a dependency on the standard managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Introduce a dedicated provisioning provider for DBaaS and Managed Kubernetes
   • Add automated circuit breakers to the provisioning engine against overload and queue buildup from self-healing services
   • Improve visibility and control over job execution and prioritisation in the provisioning queue
   • Change the provisioning queue architecture to decouple services and reduce spillover

   Lessons

   IONOS identified the linking of services through the shared provisioning queue as a key reason the degradation lasted as long as it did. Alongside making each service more robust, it is decoupling the provisioning queue and addressing dependencies between services to reduce the blast radius of future incidents.

   View case

By root cause2