Incident Library
Applied filters FactorUnverified assumptionOrganisationPalarkClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    After the last old Elasticsearch pod, elasticsearch-0, was deleted and came back on a new, empty persistent volume, `_cat/nodes` run inside that pod listed a single node: elasticsearch-0 itself, marked as master. The same command run inside elasticsearch-1 listed the other five nodes, elasticsearch-1 to elasticsearch-5, with elasticsearch-2 as master.

    Trigger

    Deleting the elasticsearch-0 pod and its PVC so that it restarted on an empty volume of the new StorageClass.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The engineer running the migration checked `_cat/nodes` after elasticsearch-0 restarted and saw it alone in a cluster of its own.

    Remediation
    • scaled the three deployments of workers writing to Elasticsearch down to zero
    • listed elasticsearch-0, elasticsearch-1 and elasticsearch-2 under initial_master_nodes in the elasticsearch ConfigMap and removed the cluster.initial_master_nodes environment variable from the StatefulSet
    • saved and deleted the elasticsearch discovery Service and deleted the PVC of elasticsearch-0 while the rolling update ran
    • set initial_master_nodes to elasticsearch-3, elasticsearch-4 and elasticsearch-5, created an empty PVC for elasticsearch-0 and deleted all six pods
    • recreated the discovery Service from the saved manifest, after which the six nodes formed one cluster with every index green
    Action items
    • Restore the original initial_master_nodes values in the ConfigMap and restart all pods again
    • Move all shards to nodes 0, 1 and 2 and scale the cluster down from six nodes to three
    • Commit all the manual changes to the repository
    Lessons

    A setting that only matters when a cluster first starts, such as Elasticsearch's cluster.initial_master_nodes, can sit in a Helm chart template rather than in the ConfigMap that was reviewed. When a pod named in it starts with an empty data directory, it can bootstrap a new cluster beside the existing one. The author's conclusion is that a migration plan like this one breaks on any surprise and needs a plan B ready. Before running it in a more important environment, rehearse it in a test environment configured like production, and either schedule downtime or move the load to another cluster: stop the writers, take a fresh backup, then move the data.

  2. Symptoms

    Right after an updated RedisFailover resource was rolled out, the large Redis database lost all its data and the service went down; the data had to be restored from a backup taken just before the change.

    Trigger

    A RedisFailover change that raised the number of Redis replicas from one to two and, in the same rollout, lowered the containers' memory requests and limits from 22 GB to 19 GB.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • restored the Redis data from the backup prepared before the rollout
    Action items
    • Report the readiness probe flaw to the Redis Operator project and test the developers' fix
    • Reconsider the use of the Spotahome Redis Operator
    • Clean up the Redis databases and fix the application code that created the excess keys
    • Consider Redis built-in clustering and sharding
    Lessons

    Changing the replica count and the pod resources in one rollout turned a seemingly harmless change into a rolling restart of the only pod with data while the new replica was still empty. A readiness probe that only checks that Redis answers a ping does not tell whether a replica has finished syncing. Operators for critical stateful components need to be evaluated for maturity before production use, and the dump.rdb file should be backed up before any change to the Redis cluster.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Persistent volumes and stateful sets and Application database. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2