Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeHardware failureFactorAutomation amplificationClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    In the week of 10 October 2022, Linode Object Storage in Newark had two incidents of reduced performance and availability, on 10 and 16 October, and in some cases the front-end gateways returned 504 gateway timeouts to customers. The second incident began while the first was still being investigated.

    Trigger

    One back-end Object Storage node had a hardware problem that was not an outright failure, so the node kept going up and down.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • Removed the failed back-end infrastructure from the Object Storage cluster
    Action items
    • Improve detection so subtle problems with failing or misbehaving hardware are found and triaged before they affect the wider cluster
    • Describe Ceph-related events more accurately to on-call administrators and define alerts more clearly
    Lessons

    Hardware that misbehaves without failing outright can cause service-wide problems, and Linode's internal monitoring had gaps in spotting such subtle issues before they affected the wider cluster.

  2. Symptoms

    After many hours of training, one job of the tr1-13B Slurm job array crashed at iteration 43680 of 311541 during the backward pass. The next job in the array started by itself and crashed right away, before training began.

    Trigger

    One GPU on one node of the allocation developed a hardware problem that produced uncorrectable ECC errors.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Nobody was around to notice the first crash, and the Slurm scheduler started the next job in the array on its own, which crashed too.

    Remediation
    • Contacted the JZ administrators, who confirmed one of the nodes was faulty
    • Continued training with the next job, which was not placed on the faulty node
    Action items
    • Add %N to the Slurm output setting (#SBATCH --output=%x-%j-%N.out) so each node writes its own log file and the node with a corrupt GPU can be identified
    • Exclude a node known to be faulty from the allocation with sbatch --exclude
    Lessons

    Without a way to link an exception to the hostname of the node that raised it, the scheduler can keep placing the training on the faulty node and the training keeps crashing; per-node log files make the faulty node visible so it can be excluded.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve GPU hardware and memory and Object storage. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1