Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0020 During an EKS 1.30 upgrade the descheduler tried to reschedule every pod on the cordoned nodes at once and production workloads went down

   UK Ministry of Justice2025

   Symptoms

   At 09:36 on 18 March 2025, during the upgrade of the live cluster to EKS 1.30, users reported that their pods were being terminated and were not restarting automatically, in both production and non-production environments. Automated infrastructure alerts fired as well, and production services had outages.

   Pod evictionPods PendingService outageUpgrade stall

   Trigger

   Upgrading the live EKS cluster from 1.29 to 1.30, during which the descheduler attempted to reschedule all pods on the cordoned nodes simultaneously.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   DeschedulerNode poolCluster autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   No headroomNo alert on limitUnreviewed defaults

   Detection

   Users reported at 09:36 that pods were being terminated and not restarting, and automated infrastructure alerts fired.

   Remediation

   • Removed the cordon annotation so pods could be rescheduled
   • Deleted stuck 1.30 nodes to force their recreation
   • Added a new node group of 20 nodes running 1.30 by hand
   • Cordoned and drained all old 1.29 nodes onto the new 1.30 nodes

   Action items

   • Raise an AWS Production System Down support case (Case ID: 174229643100496)
   • Get guidance from AWS support on querying control-plane logs to find the root cause of similar issues
   • Document a runbook for emergency scaling of a new node group in case of unexpected capacity shortages
   • Alert on an imbalance between the autoscaling group and the Kubernetes nodes
   • Review the descheduler configuration to understand why it throws pods off cordoned nodes, and fix it where possible
   • Alert on spikes in the pending pod count

   Lessons

   The write-up lists review actions rather than lessons. They show the team had no documented way to add an emergency node group, no alert on a mismatch between the autoscaling group and the nodes Kubernetes sees, no alert on a spike in pending pods, and no clear understanding of how the descheduler treats cordoned nodes.

   View case
2. IL-0019 An EKS Terraform module upgrade shrank node root disks from 100 GB to 20 GB and image pulls failed with no space left on device

   UK Ministry of Justice2023

   Symptoms

   At 13:42 the RootVolUtilisation-Critical alert fired in the high-priority alerts channel. At 14:03 a user reported image pull errors with the message "no space left on device".

   Node disk fullImage pull failuresPod evictionPods stuck in ContainerCreatingIP address exhaustion

   Trigger

   Upgrading the EKS Terraform module to version 18, which changed the node launch template, and draining workloads onto the new nodes it created.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Node root diskNode launch templateNode poolAWS VPC CNICoreDNS

   Contributing factor

   Missed in reviewNo configuration testsNo alert on limit

   Detection

   The RootVolUtilisation-Critical alert fired in the high-priority alerts channel at 13:42, and a user reported "no space left on device" image pull errors at 14:03.

   Remediation

   • Uncordoned the old default node group and drained the new nodes to move workloads back
   • Identified the launch template change that cut the root volume to 20 GB and applied a fix on the manager and live clusters
   • Drained the old node group onto the fixed nodes

   Action items

   • Update the runbook to compare launch template changes during an EKS module upgrade
   • Create a test setup that pulls images of different sizes, like live
   • Update the RootVolUtilisation alert runbook to check the disk space configuration
   • Scale CoreDNS dynamically based on the number of nodes
   • Investigate whether IPv6 can solve the IP prefix starvation problem
   • Add drift testing to identify when a terraform plan shows a change to the launch template
   • Set up logging for the CNI and ipamd logs and alerts on errors related to IP prefix starvation

   Lessons

   The write-up lists review actions rather than lessons. They aim at two gaps: the launch template changes brought by a module upgrade were not compared or drift-tested before rollout, and there were no CNI or ipamd logs or alerts to show the IP prefix starvation the team suspected during the drain.

   View case

By root cause2