Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases7 cases

6 to 7 of 7

  1. Symptoms

    On a Saturday at 5:12 pm, Blue Matador's own monitoring raised a SystemOOM event for one node in the production Kubernetes cluster. Four minutes later a second warning reported a low EBS Burst Balance on that node's root volume. CloudWatch data showed the burst balance had actually bottomed out at 5:02 pm, before the memory event; the warning arrived late because EBS metrics lag 10 to 15 minutes.

    Trigger

    Memory use of the fluentd-sumologic log shipper pods grew until the node ran out of memory; log volume in Sumo Logic had been steady, so a burst of logs was not the cause.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Blue Matador's own monitoring product alerted on the SystemOOM event, followed minutes later by a low EBS Burst Balance warning for the same node.

    Remediation
    • restarted all fluentd-sumologic pods so they started with low memory
    • set RUBY_GC_HEAP_OLDOBJECT_LIMIT_FACTOR to 0.9 on the fluentd-sumologic pods
    • added memory requests of 128Mi and limits of 1024Mi, and CPU requests of 100m and limits of 250m, to the fluentd-sumologic pods
    Action items
    • Apply default resource limits and resource quotas so that every pod runs with requests and limits
    Lessons

    When checking for restarted pods, look in every namespace, not only the application one. Set resource requests and limits on every pod, third-party ones in particular, so that one workload cannot exhaust a node. Investigate side signals such as the disk I/O spike while the logs still exist.

  2. Symptoms

    The NU.nl development team got reports that several services on one of its Kubernetes clusters behaved erratically: occasional error pages, slow responses and timeouts. The affected services were mostly internal tools and dashboards.

    Trigger

    A new ElastAlert rule, deployed shortly before from the command line, that fired if the Cloudfront-* Elasticsearch indexes stopped receiving documents; those indexes take a few million requests per hour, and the rule made ElastAlert's memory grow without bound.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Users reported error pages, slow responses and timeouts from several services; no alert fired.

    Remediation
    • terminated the NotReady nodes one by one so the auto-scaling group replaced them (the new nodes also went NotReady, but Prometheus and Grafana landed on a stable node)
    • found the ElastAlert pods' memory growth on the Grafana pod memory dashboard
    • fixed the ElastAlert problem that caused the memory growth
    Action items
    • Define alerts on resource usage such as CPU, memory and disk space
    • Keep researching an alerting strategy that combines Elasticsearch, Prometheus Alertmanager and New Relic
    • Consider exporting metrics out of the cluster and running Grafana outside it, on EC2 or a separate Kubernetes cluster
    • Either visualise the important metrics in the ELK stack or make Prometheus and Grafana more available, and improve the metrics strategy
    • Set resource limits for ElastAlert through the Helm values
    • Configure namespaces with default memory requests and limits
    • Isolate customer-facing workloads from build, logging and monitoring workloads (a dedicated node group, or later a separate tools cluster)
    • Deploy everything through automation such as Jenkins pipelines, and consider a GitOps approach
    • Deploy through a pipeline that includes a smoke test step
    • Make Kubernetes and cloud infrastructure work part of the team's sprints, picked up by all team members while pairing with more experienced members, and hold workshops that go deep into specific topics
    Lessons

    Fixing the root cause covers only a small part of what an incident can teach; the chain of smaller failures around it is where most of the learning is. A pod without a memory limit can take whole nodes down, so limits need defaults at the namespace level. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster it watches goes blind with it. Changes installed by hand from the command line leave the rest of the team without a record of what changed.

Check your cluster for this

These 7 cases involve Container memory limit and kubelet. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause3

Capacity exhaustion5 cases

  1. IL-0099 User servers on 2i2c's Earthscope hub took over 15 minutes to start and kernels were killed during a workshop, because a profile option guaranteed 8 GB of memory with no limit on 32 GB nodes
    2i2c2025
  2. IL-0110 A Grafana Agent pod's high memory use and crash-looping Hangfire pods drove a Kubernetes node into system OOM and NotReady, twice in one day
    DFDS2024
  3. IL-0094 Student pods filled the shared nodes of a JupyterHub cluster and starved the hub's core pods, freezing the hub
    2i2c2020
  4. IL-0176 Prometheus in a 235-node Kubernetes cluster crash-looped because over two million series exhausted host memory and the kernel OOM killer chose it first, as Burstable QoS gave it oom_score_adj 999
    LINE2020
  5. IL-0026 Kubernetes nodes hit SystemOOM because fluentd-sumologic log shipper pods had no memory limits

Software defect1 case

Organisation
  1. IL-0175 Lowering a JVM pod's CPU request from 2 to 1 pushed memory past the 90% alert because the JVM treats a cgroup v1 cpu.shares value of exactly 1024 as unset and sized Reactor Netty threads from the node's 36 CPUs

Configuration change1 case

Organisation
  1. IL-0035 Worker nodes went NotReady after a new ElastAlert rule without memory limits used up node memory
    NU.nl2019