Cases15 cases

6 to 10 of 15

1. IL-0067 Redis filled its persistent volume, corrupted its append-only file and crash-looped on every restart

   BC Government2025sev1

   Symptoms

   The Klamm production application was completely unavailable for about 30 minutes outside working hours. Klamm's queue workers timed out because they could not reach the Redis cache, and the services that depend on it were badly affected.

   Service outageContainer crash loopPersistent volume full

   Trigger

   A large, unexpected spike in I/O from a Klamm Laravel worker sharply increased requests to the Redis cache.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Persistent volumes and stateful setsIn-memory cache

   Contributing factor

   No capacity planning

   Remediation

   • backed off the Redis StatefulSet and the deployment
   • deleted the corrupted PVC and rebuilt it
   • restarted the StatefulSet and the deployment

   Action items

   • Increase the Klamm Redis cache volume to 100Mi
   • Integrate Sysdig monitoring on the namespace
   • Enable replica pods on the Redis cluster

   View case
2. IL-0103 During an EKS node AMI update, Istio sidecars crash-looped because hundreds of pods restarting at once overloaded the external certificate authority behind istiod

   Tetrate (unnamed U.S. federal customer)2025sev1

   Symptoms

   While the customer was updating the AMIs of its Amazon EKS nodes across more than 30 clusters running Istio, sidecar-injected workloads in one cluster failed to start and showed CrashLoopBackOff.

   Container crash loopProbe failures

   Trigger

   Updating the EKS node AMIs, which started hundreds of sidecar-injected pods at the same time.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   IstioAdmission webhookNode operating system image

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnknown limit

   Detection

   Sidecar-injected workloads in the updated cluster failed to start and showed CrashLoopBackOff; the customer raised a Severity 1 ticket and a Tetrate engineer was reviewing logs within six minutes.

   Remediation

   • scaled istiod down temporarily from 40 replicas to 1 to slow Istio's internal processes and ease the load on the CA
   • deleted the CertificateSigningRequests stuck in the Approved, Failed state
   • restarted the pods gradually in a controlled order instead of all at once

   Lessons

   When a mesh hands certificate signing to an external CA, every pod start becomes a signing request to that CA, so a mass restart such as a node image rollout can overload it. Sidecars then abort under istiod's 10-second default CA timeout even though the CSRs are eventually signed. Restarting pods in controlled batches keeps the request rate within what the CA can handle. The author's point is that diagnosing such a failure means looking at the whole service mesh ecosystem, including its external dependencies, not only Istio.

   View case
3. IL-0119 ChatGPT web service pods crash-looped on failing health checks after a Cosmos DB failure, leaving too few healthy pods to serve the web layer

   OpenAI2025

   Symptoms

   From 3:30am to 7:08am PT, chatgpt.com and a small number of OpenAI APIs returned elevated error rates. The status page classed the incident as a full outage.

   High error rateContainer crash loopProbe failures

   Trigger

   A failure of Cosmos DB in ChatGPT, at OpenAI's service provider.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Application database

   Contributing factor

   Health check tied to a dependency

   Remediation

   • the service provider recovered the affected Cosmos DB databases at 4:25am PT
   • fixed the web server's health checking logic, which ended the pod crash loop

   Action items

   • Change the web systems to degrade more gracefully when they fail, including concurrency control and better load shedding
   • Make the database layer more resilient to service provider outages (described as already underway)

   Lessons

   The database came back at 4:25am PT, yet users saw errors until 7:08am PT: the web tier's own health checks kept removing pods after the dependency had recovered. The planned changes target the web tier's behaviour under failure, with concurrency control and load shedding, rather than the database alone.

   View case
4. IL-0110 A Grafana Agent pod's high memory use and crash-looping Hangfire pods drove a Kubernetes node into system OOM and NotReady, twice in one day

   DFDS2024

   Symptoms

   At 10:01 UTC on 2024-03-13 a Kubernetes node entered NotReady state, with CPU requests at 78% and memory requests at 82%. An alert fired in Slack at 10:03 and was picked up at 10:05. An attempt to SSH into the node at 10:13 failed because it was unresponsive; it started responding again at 10:19.

   Node NotReadyContainer crash loopOOMKilledMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   Pods of a dev container that used Hangfire to trigger jobs failed with OOM and crash-looped on a node where a Grafana Agent pod was already using a lot of memory.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Telemetry agentContainer memory limitApplication database

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo resource requests or limitsHarmful manual actionMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   A Slack alert fired two minutes after the node went NotReady and was picked up two minutes later; the second node's NotReady at 15:03 also raised a Slack alert.

   Remediation

   • marked the EC2 instance unhealthy so a new node started
   • cordoned and force-drained the NotReady node and terminated its EC2 instance
   • removed the new LimitRange from the Grafana Agent namespace and restarted the Grafana Agent pod
   • scaled the dev container to 0 replicas, after which EC2 network traffic returned to normal
   • after the second NotReady, scaled the dev container to 0 replicas again and added a new node
   • emailed the team that owns the dev container, which confirmed it was working on a fix

   Action items

   • Move grafana-agent to the monitoring node group
   • Add alerts for when bandwidth across the cluster reaches a certain threshold
   • Investigate whether memory limits can be set on the grafana-agent Helm chart
   • Investigate grafana-agent memory usage
   • Ask Grafana support whether grafana-agent should use a PVC
   • Consider pushing node logs to Loki with limited retention
   • Create a wiki page with common metrics and log queries to check when investigating issues with Kubernetes nodes

   Lessons

   Dev workloads mixed with production let one crash-looping dev container take down nodes that production also used, and a monitoring agent outside its dedicated node group added to the memory pressure. Scaling the suspect container back up before its owners had fixed it brought the failure back on the replacement node. The team also noted that action items from earlier post-mortems need follow-up, and that knowledge of useful CloudWatch metrics had not been shared, which made the diagnosis harder.

   View case
5. IL-0202 A burst of queries and database writes exhausted connection pools and memory on Honeycomb's ingest hosts, and Kubernetes crash-loop back-off kept failed hosts offline so ingest capacity stayed too low to recover

   Honeycomb2023sev1

   Symptoms

   Standard alerting paged Honeycomb's on-call engineers about the performance and stability of event ingestion, and the automated load-shedding mechanisms tripped and sent further notifications. The status page described a higher than normal error rate and response time on the ingestion service.

   High error rateHigh latencyContainer crash loopService outageDatabase overload

   Trigger

   An abnormally large number of queries arrived from many separate connections within a few minutes.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Application databaseIn-memory cache

   Contributing factor

   Retry stormAutomation amplification

   Detection

   Standard alerting notified the on-call engineers about ingestion performance and stability, and the automated load-shedding mechanisms added notifications when they tripped. The first status post, about alerts on a higher than normal error rate and response time, went up at 18:28 PST (02:28 UTC), 13 minutes after the 02:15 UTC start.

   Remediation

   • Scaled the ingest fleet up manually and aggressively
   • Cut off most ingest for a few minutes so the ingest hosts could come back with enough capacity
   • Temporarily lowered the rate limits for the most aggressive traffic sources until their traffic subsided

   Action items

   • Keep the ingest fleet scaled up to prevent a repeat while longer-term fixes are worked on
   • Decide on the projects that will address these failure paths

   Lessons

   Load shedding and auto-scaling were in place, yet a burst that arrived faster than the cache could spread its writes still took the ingest hosts down. During recovery, Kubernetes' crash loop back-off worked against the operators: the hosts that had failed stayed offline while the fleet needed every host. Clients that retry whole OTel batches after a partial drop can multiply traffic many times over, so per-source rate limits were what finally stabilised ingest.

   View case

By root cause7