Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases8 cases

8 to 8 of 8

  1. Symptoms

    On Sunday 2 June 2019, with user impact beginning between 11:47 and 11:49 US/Pacific, Google Cloud projects in several US regions saw elevated packet loss from network congestion, and some regions became unreachable. Customers saw higher latency, intermittent errors and lost connectivity to instances in us-central1, us-east1, us-east4, us-west2, northamerica-northeast1 and southamerica-east1, while us-west1, Europe and Asia had no regional congestion.

    Trigger

    At 11:45 US/Pacific a relatively rare type of datacenter maintenance event started in one physical location, and the automation that runs it descheduled logical clusters that also held network control plane jobs in other physical locations.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Google engineers were alerted to the failure two minutes after it began and started the incident process used for the most serious production incidents. The first customer notice appeared on the status page at 12:53 US/Pacific.

    Remediation
    • Lowered the priority of less critical network traffic classes to reduce congestion
    • Halted the datacenter automation software responsible for the maintenance event
    • Rescheduled the network control plane and its supporting infrastructure in each location
    • Rebuilt and redistributed the lost network control plane configuration, rolling it out from 14:03
    • Directed service traffic away from the affected regions
    • Moved the Cloud VPN control plane in three regions out of its fail-safe state
    Action items
    • Keep the maintenance automation off until safeguards stop it descheduling jobs in several physical locations at once
    • Harden the cluster management software to reject such requests whatever their origin
    • Reconfigure the network control plane to reject maintenance requests of the type involved
    • Make the network control plane in each location persist its configuration
    • Let the network stay in fail static mode longer when the control plane is lost
    • Review, update and test emergency response tooling and procedures, including customer communication tooling, for such network failures
    • Extend continuous disaster recovery testing to this and similarly catastrophic failures
Check your cluster for this

These 8 cases involve BGP routing and Backbone network (WAN). kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause3

Capacity exhaustion2 cases

  1. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table
  2. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours

Software defect3 cases

  1. IL-0347 About 25% of Scaleway FR-PAR-1 hypervisors lost VPC connectivity when both VPC BGP route reflectors got stuck
  2. IL-0342 DigitalOcean's AMS3, LON1 and SFO2 data centers lost Internet connectivity in repeated waves as edge routers failed
  3. IL-0222 Google Cloud US regions had heavy packet loss and some went unreachable after the network control plane was descheduled

Configuration change3 cases

  1. IL-0225 An IGP purge command made every Microsoft WAN router recompute routes, causing global latency, timeouts and packet loss
  2. IL-0539 KT's internet service failed nationwide for about 89 minutes as wrong routes spread from one router in Busan
    KT2021
  3. IL-0228 IPv4 routing across OVHcloud's global network broke after a router change put the full internet routing table into OSPF