Cases7 cases

1 to 5 of 7

1. IL-0349 IONOS Private Cloud in Berlin lost management access, storage and VM internet routing after a VLAN change

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 15 January 2026, network services for VMware-based Private Clouds in IONOS Cloud's Berlin location stopped working: customers lost management VPN access and traffic to and from their virtual machines. Inside IONOS, several management interfaces in the Berlin region could no longer be reached.

   Network unreachableStorage disconnected or stale mounts

   Trigger

   During a planned maintenance window to add a new VLAN to the management devices, a human error in the command replaced the existing VLANs on the trunk between the core and management devices instead of adding to them, so only the new VLAN stayed active.

   Root cause

   Operator error

   Component

   Network switchTransit gateway or network interconnect

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo safeguard on destructive change

   Remediation

   • Restarted the affected storage services in the final stage of recovery, which caused a brief second outage

   Action items

   • Audit the management device architecture to segment it better (target Q3 2026)
   • Evaluate and implement ways to prevent unintended VLAN changes, such as improved configuration safeguards or automation scripts (target Q1 2026)

   View case
2. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours

   Cloudflare2025

   Symptoms

   From 16:27 UTC on 21 August 2025, users connecting to Cloudflare from servers in AWS us-east-1, or receiving connections from Cloudflare there, saw high latency, packet loss and failures to reach origins. Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC.

   Packet lossHigh latencyIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   At about 16:27 UTC a single customer began sending many requests from AWS us-east-1 to Cloudflare for objects in Cloudflare's cache, doubling the total traffic from Cloudflare to AWS.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnectBGP routingCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   No headroomHarmful manual actionExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC, and an incident was raised for customer impact at 17:45 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Rate limited the single customer whose traffic caused the surge
   • Took further traffic engineering actions that fully resolved the congestion
   • Asked AWS to revert its BGP prefix withdrawals, which AWS finished at 20:07 UTC

   Action items

   • Build a mechanism to deprioritise a customer's traffic when it congests the network enough to affect others
   • Speed up the Data Center Interconnect upgrades to add network capacity
   • Work with AWS so the two companies' BGP traffic engineering actions do not conflict
   • Build a traffic management system that gives each customer a network resource budget and automates the manual actions used here

   Lessons

   Cloudflare concludes that it must isolate customers better so that no single customer can take over shared network resources and degrade the platform for others, and that its network needs enough capacity to meet demand. It describes the outage as the result of insufficient network congestion management during an unusual high-traffic event.

   View case
3. IL-0361 Job searches on seek.com.au failed for 16 minutes as a Transit Gateway silently dropped 9001-byte packets

   SEEK2021

   Symptoms

   In May 2021 some users of seek.com.au got errors when they searched for jobs, for 16 minutes. SEEK was in the middle of moving the traffic between two VPCs, the one that carried searches, from a VPC peering connection to an AWS Transit Gateway, and the team noticed quickly that search was broken.

   High error ratePacket lossIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   In the second step of the migration, SEEK changed the routing table of the first VPC to use the transit gateway while the second VPC still routed over the peering connection, so the two directions of each connection took different paths.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnect

   Contributing factor

   Unknown limitUnreviewed defaultsMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The team noticed soon after the routing change that search on seek.com.au was not working.

   Remediation

   • Rolled back the migration of the search traffic's peering connection to the transit gateway

   Action items

   • Lower the MTU of EC2 instances to 8500, on Amazon Linux 2 with a script at /sbin/ifup-local that runs whenever a network interface comes up

   Lessons

   A transit gateway has a smaller MTU than a same-region peering connection, drops oversized packets silently and clamps the MSS only on packets that cross it. When a migration leaves the two directions of a TCP connection on different paths, the clamp lands on the wrong side of the handshake and large packets are lost; the fix is not to send packets larger than 8500 bytes.

   View case
4. IL-0223 A connection surge congested the devices between AWS's internal and main networks in us-east-1, breaking EC2 APIs

   Amazon Web Services2021

   Symptoms

   From 7:30 AM PST on 7 December 2021, AWS services in us-east-1 that communicate between AWS's internal network and its main network saw rising latency and errors. The AWS operations teams lost real-time monitoring data at once, and the first thing found in the logs was elevated internal DNS errors.

   Control plane lagHigh latencyHigh error rateMonitoring outageDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   At 7:30 AM PST an automated activity that scales the capacity of one AWS service hosted in the main AWS network triggered unexpected behaviour from a large number of clients inside the internal network.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnectAutomated capacity manager

   Contributing factor

   Retry stormCircular dependency

   Detection

   The congestion immediately cut off real-time monitoring data for the AWS operations teams, who turned to logs and first identified elevated internal DNS errors.

   Remediation

   • Moved internal DNS traffic away from the congested network paths
   • Isolated the top sources of traffic onto dedicated network devices
   • Disabled some heavy network traffic services, including EventBridge event delivery
   • Brought additional networking capacity online
   • Disabled the automated scaling activities that triggered the event

   Action items

   • Keep the triggering scaling activities off until all remediations are deployed
   • Fix the latent issue that kept networking clients from backing off
   • Deploy network configuration that protects the affected networking devices in a similar congestion event
   • Keep API Gateway servers healthy when the internal network is unavailable and speed up their recycling
   • Release a new Service Health Dashboard that makes service impact easier to understand
   • Run the support system actively across multiple AWS regions

   View case
5. IL-0336 AWS Direct Connect traffic into the Tokyo Region had packet loss and intermittent connectivity for about six hours

   Amazon Web Services2021

   Symptoms

   From 7:30 AM JST on 2 September 2021, AWS Direct Connect customers saw intermittent connectivity problems and elevated packet loss on traffic going to their VPCs in the Tokyo (AP-NORTHEAST-1) Region. Internal AWS alarms on Direct Connect packet loss fired at the same time.

   Packet lossIntermittent connection failures

   Trigger

   Customer traffic consistently generated packets with a very specific set of attributes and contents, and these packets set off a latent defect in the network device operating system on one layer of the Direct Connect network in Tokyo.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnect

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectUnrepresentative staging

   Detection

   Internal alarms alerted AWS engineers to elevated packet loss for Direct Connect customers connecting to the Tokyo Region at 7:30 AM JST. The automation that monitors network devices also saw a higher rate of failed devices than normal and alerted engineers.

   Remediation

   • Removed the failing network devices from service so healthy devices carried the traffic, which helped only for a time
   • Reset failed devices and brought them back into service slowly, without stopping the failures
   • Disabled the new protocol in a single Availability Zone, then across the Tokyo Region

   Action items

   • Apply the change carefully to all other AWS Regions, with a new way to detect and remediate the issue before customers are affected

   View case

By root cause5