Incident Library
Applied filters SymptomPacket lossClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases24 cases

7 to 11 of 24

  1. Symptoms

    A team using Neco, the Kubernetes platform run by Cybozu's Cloud Platform team, reported what looked like a performance problem in the cluster DNS servers. An application in a pod that resolved cluster Services at hundreds of requests per second frequently got `no such host` and `i/o timeout` errors.

    Trigger

    The number of MySQL clusters watched by the monitoring application increased, and after that the name resolution errors became frequent.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A team using the platform contacted the Cloud Platform team, describing the errors as a performance problem in the cluster DNS server.

    Remediation
    • Raised the kernel parameter netdev_max_backlog on the nodes
    • Set up alerts on softnet
    • Wrote a runbook for the softnet alerts
    Action items
    • Evaluate Cilium's netkit device so pod packets bypass the backlog queue
    Lessons

    Raising netdev_max_backlog makes the same failure less likely and the new alerts catch it early, but it is not a root fix: a pod that sends more packets can fill the backlog queue again. Cybozu sees replacing the veth interface with netkit, which skips the backlog queue, as the root fix.

  2. Symptoms

    From 11:45 UTC on 30 July 2024, a subset of customers got intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes when connecting to Microsoft services that use Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN). The Azure Portal team saw the first service degradation at 11:47 UTC.

    Trigger

    Around 11:45 UTC the Azure network DDoS protection service was disengaging after a routine DDoS mitigation and returning traffic to its default routing to AFD, but the routes at one site in Europe could not be updated because the network control plane could not reach that site during a local power outage.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The Azure Portal team detected service degradation at 11:47 UTC and began to investigate. At 12:10 UTC network monitoring correlated the Portal incident to a network issue at one site in Europe, and networking engineers joined.

    Remediation
    • Rerouted traffic under the standard congestion playbook, which removed most of the impact by 13:58 UTC
    • Ordered the network control plane to reissue its commands to the misbehaving device, which could not be reached
    • Removed the device that kept attracting traffic from the network and scanned the network for other issues
    Action items
    • Add the missing configuration on network devices so a DDoS mitigation issue in one geography cannot spread to another
    • Improve validation and monitoring in the Azure network to detect invalid configurations
    • Improve monitoring for when the DDoS protection service is unreachable from the control plane but still serving traffic
  3. Symptoms

    From 15:22 US/Pacific on 16 May 2024, new VMs and other new instances across Google Cloud came up without network programming, so the new instances could not open network connections, and VMs that were migrated or restarted lost connectivity. Changes to virtual network configuration, such as firewall rules and load balancers, were not applied. Internal monitoring alerted Google engineers at 15:41.

    Trigger

    Google's infrastructure team ran a routine maintenance action meant to shut down one unused VPC Controller in a single Google Cloud zone, and the automation shut down VPC controllers in all zones where the controllers were still in use.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Internal monitoring alerts reached Google engineers at 15:41 US/Pacific, and the investigation started immediately.

    Remediation
    • Paused maintenance operations to prevent the shutdown from repeating
    • Brought the affected VPC Controllers back into a serving state in every zone
    • Stopped the automation responsible for the shutdown until safeguards are in place
    • Recovered partial Apigee proxy deployments by hand
    • Cleaned up VMs left behind by failed Dataproc cluster deletions
    Action items
    • Add safety measures that check that maintenance operations carry correctly scoped zone information
    • Make the underlying tools reject maintenance operations that do not specify zones
    • Tighten on-demand access control so one maintenance invocation cannot work across multiple zones
    • Add safety checks, testing and validation for maintenance operations, including positive and negative test cases for the new safety measures
  4. Symptoms

    From 19:50 US/Pacific on 4 December 2023, Cloud Bigtable customers in us-central1 saw higher latency and a low level of connection errors, affecting about 0.06% of Bigtable dataplane requests. Automated monitoring first detected the problem at 23:35.

    Trigger

    A change that caused an isolation failure on the machines running Cloud Bigtable servers.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    –
    Detection

    Automated monitoring detected the problem at 23:35 US/Pacific on 4 December 2023.

    Remediation
    • Redirected some traffic away from a subset of the affected machines
    • Rolled back the change that triggered the isolation failure
    Action items
    • Put controls in place to prevent a recurrence
  5. Symptoms

    On Friday 17 November 2023, the local government administrative computer services in Korea stopped working, and the Government24 service of the National Information Resources Service was down until the next morning.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • Replaced the two malfunctioning L4 devices with higher-performance devices, tested them and resumed Government24 at 09:00 on 18 November
    • Moved the connection on the defective port of the Daejeon center router to another port at 07:00 on 19 November
    • Swapped out the module of the router that had the fault
    Action items
    • Inspect all old equipment that may have similar port defects
    • Revise the incident handling manual so the public is told about an outage quickly
    • Announce the status of service recovery quickly through various means
    • Build integrated monitoring of critical service systems and related equipment to catch signs of failure early
    • Form a standing incident response team to send into major outages
    • Prepare administrative measures and a response manual so administrative services can still be provided when core digital government services stop
    • Name a paralysis of the national computer network as a type of disaster and accident, managed from prevention to recovery
    • Build a government-wide crisis response system for linked information systems and strengthen the control tower for outage prevention and response
    • Improve how public IT projects are run and managed, replace hardware and software past their service life quickly and make project pricing realistic
    • Reduce the reliance on outsourcing for developing and operating information systems and bring digital talent into government
    • Review the redundancy, recovery systems and network configuration of the systems in the National Information Resources Service, and its organisation
    • Work with manufacturers on a way to find and monitor failures of internal parts earlier
    Lessons

    The team said that hardware faults like this defective port also happen in the private sector, and that failures of parts inside a device are hard to catch in advance with basic monitoring and daily visual checks. Redundancy did not help because it takes over only when a whole device stops working, and a module that failed only in part did not make the device count as abnormal. The impact was wide because the defective port carried traffic for all the services.

Check your cluster for this

These 24 cases involve BGP routing and Backbone network (WAN). kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause9

Configuration change5 cases

  1. IL-0394 A Cloudflare router in Miami leaked IPv6 BGP routes to peers and providers for 25 minutes, congesting the backbone
  2. IL-0339 Azure Front Door and Azure CDN users saw intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes for hours
  3. IL-0225 An IGP purge command made every Microsoft WAN router recompute routes, causing global latency, timeouts and packet loss
  4. IL-0461 Every rollout of Datadog's metrics query service on Kubernetes raised errors that the logs blamed on DNS
  5. IL-0361 Job searches on seek.com.au failed for 16 minutes as a Transit Gateway silently dropped 9001-byte packets
    SEEK2021

Capacity exhaustion5 cases

  1. IL-0564 Linode's Miami, Milan and Sao Paulo data centers had packet loss as traffic moved onto congested alternate paths
    Linode2025
  2. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours
  3. IL-0440 Pods on Cybozu's Neco Kubernetes platform got frequent no such host and i/o timeout DNS errors from dropped packets
    Cybozu2024
  4. IL-0386 After a move to Google Cloud, Postgres connection timeouts and memcached i/o timeouts spiked on GKE nodes
  5. IL-0537 Sakura Cloud host servers repeatedly lost their storage connection, about five minutes per port switchover

Operator error1 case

Contributing factor
Organisation
  1. IL-0348 Scaleway's FR-PAR region lost public internet connectivity when one 100 Gbps backbone link was saturated

Dependency failure2 cases

Organisation
  1. IL-0257 canva.com went down for about 50 minutes when 1.5 million requests per second OOM-killed every API Gateway task
    Canva2024
  2. IL-0358 Packet Public Cloud locations had high latency and unreachable paths from routing loops and blackholed traffic
    Packet2019

Software defect4 cases

  1. IL-0347 About 25% of Scaleway FR-PAR-1 hypervisors lost VPC connectivity when both VPC BGP route reflectors got stuck
  2. IL-0529 New Google Cloud VMs and other instances came up without network connectivity in all zones after VPC controllers stopped
  3. IL-0336 AWS Direct Connect traffic into the Tokyo Region had packet loss and intermittent connectivity for about six hours
  4. IL-0222 Google Cloud US regions had heavy packet loss and some went unreachable after the network control plane was descheduled

Faulty deployment3 cases

  1. IL-0293 Cloud Bigtable in us-central1 had higher latency and connection errors for about 32 hours from low-rate packet loss
  2. IL-0530 Virtual router controllers in us-central1 ran out of memory in a loop, cutting networking for new and migrated VMs
  3. IL-0532 Azure Software Load Balancer sent packets of one flow to different backends, dropping Firewall and Private Link traffic

Hardware failure1 case

  1. IL-0540 Korea's local government administrative services and Government24 went down as a router port dropped most large packets

Cloud provider outage1 case

Organisation
  1. IL-0220 An overloaded AWS Transit Gateway dropped packets on 4 January 2021, and Slack's web tier saturated and went down
    Slack2021

DNS or network fault2 cases

  1. IL-0240 Cloudflare API requests failed and the dashboard slowed for hours after the authentication database lost its replicas
  2. IL-0590 F5 load balancers cached a path MTU of 296 after Rackspace reboots, and Mailgun connections failed intermittently