Cases14 cases

4 to 8 of 14

1. IL-0191 A label selector accidentally added to the Loki distributor Service matched only the new pods of a rollout, which took all write traffic, were OOM-killed and stalled the rollout

   Grafana Labs2022

   Symptoms

   During a rollout of the Grafana Loki distributor Deployment in one Grafana Cloud Logs environment, the write path went down for about 25 minutes. The newly started distributor pods were OOM-killed over and over, never passed their health and readiness checks, and the rollout stopped making progress.

   Service outageOOMKilledLoad imbalanceProbe failures

   Trigger

   Step 1 of moving the Loki ring off a separately deployed key-value store onto embedded memberlist added a new label, gossip_ring_member: 'true', to the distributor pods and Service, together with a small config change, and the change required a rollout of the distributors.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Configuration templatingService discoveryContainer memory limit

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsIgnored early signalUnrepresentative staging

   Detection

   The first clue was kubectl get pods and the kube_deployment_status_replicas_updated metric showing that only 16 of 140 distributor pods had been updated.

   Remediation

   • scaled the distributor Deployment out horizontally so the load spread over more pods with the new label and the rollout could continue
   • reverted the migration step to end the outage
   • set service_ignored_labels:: [$._config.gossip_member_label] and passed it to k.util.serviceFor so the label is no longer copied into the Service selector

   Action items

   • Update the function that generates a Service from a Deployment or StatefulSet to handle edge cases, including this one

   Lessons

   A Service whose selector is built by copying every label of a workload changes which pods it matches as soon as a new label is added. During a rollout it then matches only the new pods, which receive all the traffic before there are enough of them. A few errors during a rollout in other environments hid the problem, because those environments gave distributors more memory and could absorb the shift. Manifest diffs kept for every pull request made it possible to see that the Service selector had changed.

   View case
2. IL-0107 Kyverno stuck in a crash loop behind a webhook with failurePolicy fail blocked every change to Kubernetes Service objects for 88 minutes

   DFDS2022

   Symptoms

   At 11:38 UTC on 3 August 2022 an end-user team told the platform team that applying a Service resource to one of the Kubernetes clusters failed.

   Deploys failingContainer crash loop

   Trigger

   A certificate chain in a third-party application expired, through no action of DFDS, and the outdated Kyverno installation got stuck in a crash loop.

   Root cause

   Certificate or credential expiry

   Component

   Policy engineAdmission webhook

   Contributing factor

   Deferred upgradesUnreviewed defaultsMonitoring blind spotIgnored early signal

   Detection

   An end-user team alerted the platform team at 11:38 UTC that applying a Service resource failed; the platform team started looking into it at 11:50 UTC.

   Remediation

   • reproduced the issue in a sandbox cluster and deployed the fix there first
   • updated Kyverno to a newer Helm chart version in the affected production cluster

   Action items

   • Implement monitoring on Kyverno
   • Create internal documentation on the Kyverno setup
   • Investigate the exact certificate issue in the third-party application
   • Consider changing the failurePolicy on ClusterPolicy resources going forward

   Lessons

   Operational issues should be added to the 'Ops Day to Day' board from the start.

   View case
3. IL-0032 Mutating admission controller generated broken JSON patches, silently blocking deploys for a week until a production service ran down to two pods

   Airbnb2020

   Symptoms

   A production service at Airbnb showed a high error rate and could not be deployed. The deploy failed with a cryptic Kubernetes error about being unable to access invalid index 5.

   High error rateThroughput degradationDeploys failing

   Trigger

   A change to the mutating admission controller, which had been rolled out within the previous month, had gone in seven days before the incident surfaced; when it had to delete two items from an array in a spec, it generated an invalid JSON patch that removed index 2 and then index 3.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Admission webhookHorizontal pod autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectMonitoring blind spotIgnored early signal

   Detection

   The affected service reported a high error rate and its deploy failed; the slow degradation of other services over the previous seven days had gone unnoticed.

   Remediation

   • deleted the mutating admission controller from the affected cluster

   Action items

   • Create alerts from the existing metrics that would have shown the problem earlier

   Lessons

   Keep in mind that a mutating admission controller exists in the cluster; a recently added one is easy to forget during an incident. Search for the exact error message early instead of working on the visible symptoms. Page a teammate when progress stalls.

   View case
4. IL-0049 Partial DNS outage after CoreDNS scaled down and kube-proxy failed to delete stale conntrack entries

   Preply2020

   Symptoms

   Prometheus detected a high rate of 5xx responses on three services, called A, B and C in the write-up, and paged the on-call engineers through VictorOps at 22:18 EET. The 5xx rate was also visible in Kibana.

   DNS resolution failuresHigh error rateStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   Because load in the cluster was low, the CoreDNS autoscaler reduced the number of CoreDNS pods from 3 to 2.

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   CoreDNSkube-proxyconntrack table

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationIgnored early signalNo caching

   Detection

   Prometheus alerted on a high 5xx rate on services A, B and C and paged on-call through VictorOps.

   Remediation

   • reverted the latest release of the affected service
   • a regular deploy created new nodes, the CoreDNS autoscaler added CoreDNS pods, and the conntrack table was rewritten

   Action items

   • Disable the autoscaler for CoreDNS
   • Run a DNS cache server in production
   • Monitor conntrack usage

   Lessons

   Scaling CoreDNS down is not free: if kube-proxy fails to clear conntrack entries for the removed pod, clients keep sending DNS queries to it. Known DNS weaknesses in a cluster should be prioritised before they cause an outage, and fixes that only treat consequences leave the underlying conntrack problem in place.

   View case
5. IL-0026 Kubernetes nodes hit SystemOOM because fluentd-sumologic log shipper pods had no memory limits

   Blue Matador2019

   Symptoms

   On a Saturday at 5:12 pm, Blue Matador's own monitoring raised a SystemOOM event for one node in the production Kubernetes cluster. Four minutes later a second warning reported a low EBS Burst Balance on that node's root volume. CloudWatch data showed the burst balance had actually bottomed out at 5:02 pm, before the memory event; the warning arrived late because EBS metrics lag 10 to 15 minutes.

   OOMKilled

   Trigger

   Memory use of the fluentd-sumologic log shipper pods grew until the node ran out of memory; log volume in Sumo Logic had been steady, so a burst of logs was not the cause.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Telemetry agentContainer memory limit

   Contributing factor

   No resource requests or limitsIgnored early signal

   Detection

   Blue Matador's own monitoring product alerted on the SystemOOM event, followed minutes later by a low EBS Burst Balance warning for the same node.

   Remediation

   • restarted all fluentd-sumologic pods so they started with low memory
   • set RUBY_GC_HEAP_OLDOBJECT_LIMIT_FACTOR to 0.9 on the fluentd-sumologic pods
   • added memory requests of 128Mi and limits of 1024Mi, and CPU requests of 100m and limits of 250m, to the fluentd-sumologic pods

   Action items

   • Apply default resource limits and resource quotas so that every pod runs with requests and limits

   Lessons

   When checking for restarted pods, look in every namespace, not only the application one. Set resource requests and limits on every pod, third-party ones in particular, so that one workload cannot exhaust a node. Investigate side signals such as the disk I/O spike while the logs still exist.

   View case

By root cause7