Cases71 cases

49 to 53 of 71

1. IL-0086 A deployment meant for a CircleCI test Kubernetes cluster also removed Traefik and Calico resources from the production cluster, taking down the CircleCI UI and runner.circleci.com

   CircleCI2021

   Symptoms

   At 15:35 EST on 11 March 2021 the CircleCI web UI and runner.circleci.com became unavailable. The API, which uses a separate ingress point, stayed reachable, and builds kept running.

   Service outageResources deleted

   Trigger

   An update deployed to a test Kubernetes cluster also removed Traefik and Calico resources from CircleCI's primary production cluster.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Ingress controllerCalico

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo runbookMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   CircleCI engineers were alerted and began investigating. The status page posted its first notice at 20:45 UTC.

   Remediation

   • restored Traefik in the production cluster
   • restored Calico in the production cluster, after which pods served customer requests again

   Action items

   • Improve network-level documentation and runbooks to cover every layer of the Kubernetes networks
   • Improve monitoring and alerting for the network infrastructure
   • Add guardrails that isolate the production and staging clusters so they cannot interfere with each other

   Lessons

   A deployment path that can reach both a test cluster and production can remove shared networking components from production. When the ingress controller and the CNI are both affected, restoring the ingress alone is not enough: engineers had to find the link between Calico and Traefik and restore Calico before pods served traffic again. Time went to DNS and AWS red herrings because nothing linked the outage to the test deployment; CircleCI's answer is better network runbooks, network alerting and guardrails between clusters.

   View case
2. IL-0172 An AWS Tokyo data centre cooling failure took down 6 of 60 CockroachDB nodes on Kubernetes within 22 minutes, and ranges lost quorum because the Helm-deployed cluster had no availability zone locality configured

   Devsisters2021

   Symptoms

   During a team dinner, a Slack alert reported that one node of the CockroachDB cluster behind Cookie Run: Kingdom had gone down. The DevOps engineers were not worried at first, because CockroachDB is built to survive the loss of some nodes.

   Node NotReadyData lossService outage

   Trigger

   A cooling system failure in an AWS Tokyo region data centre overheated the servers in one availability zone, which held CockroachDB nodes.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Application databaseHelm

   Contributing factor

   Unverified assumptionExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   A Slack alert reported that a database node had gone down.

   Remediation

   • copied the data outside the broken ranges into new tables with INSERT INTO ... SELECT queries that skipped the affected ranges
   • ran debug unsafe-remove-dead-replicas together with Cockroach Labs engineers, recovering one of the two lost data ranges
   • restored the last data range with the storage-layer recovery method from the previous incident

   Action items

   • Configure CockroachDB Locality so data is spread evenly across availability zones
   • Deploy with one chart and a separate values file per availability zone to set Locality
   • Replace nodes by adding Locality-configured nodes, confirming replicas in every zone, then retiring the old nodes

   Lessons

   A replication factor sized for random instance retirements does not protect against a whole availability zone failing; for a game of this scale a multi-AZ placement is required, not optional. Keeping one uniform Helm chart made zone topology hard to set, which is part of why it was left out. A repetitive chart with a values file per zone sets it reliably.

   View case
3. IL-0094 Student pods filled the shared nodes of a JupyterHub cluster and starved the hub's core pods, freezing the hub

   2i2c2020

   Symptoms

   At 08:52 PM IST a report came in from WER that many students could not access the JupyterHub and that it was frozen; pages were stuck and nothing was usable. A rise in activity was visible by 09:02 PM, but the usual fixes, such as opening an incognito window and restarting servers, did not help.

   Service outageSustained high node CPU

   Trigger

   WER students' pods used a good chunk of their memory limit (tests had shown they almost always use just under 1G of their 2G limit, against a 512M guarantee) on nodes shared with the hub's core pods.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Node poolContainer memory limit

   Contributing factor

   No resource requests or limitsUnverified assumptionExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   WER reported stuck pages and students unable to reach the hub in a GitHub issue (2i2c-org/docs#27).

   Remediation

   • removed memory overcommit for the WER students
   • raised resource guarantees for all core pods, which restarted them and moved some to a new node

   Action items

   • Put user pods in a separate pool so they do not create pressure on the core pods (infrastructure#89)
   • Set limits on the support infrastructure (Prometheus, Grafana, ingress) as well (infrastructure#90)
   • Document and think about overcommit ratios for memory usage (infrastructure#91)
   • Set up better Grafana dashboards to monitor resource usage (infrastructure#92)
   • Document how people can get kubectl access to the cluster so others can look into issues too (infrastructure#87)

   Lessons

   Core pods without resource guarantees get whatever is left on a node, so when user pods on the same nodes fill the CPU and memory, the hub that serves everyone freezes. The memory overcommit ratio has to come from measured use: WER students used just under 1G against a 512M guarantee, which a 4x overcommit could not hold.

   View case
4. IL-0089 A test cluster deletion script run with the kube context pointing at the live-1 production cluster deleted its ingress controller, monitoring, logging, cert-manager, kiam and external-dns

   UK Ministry of Justice2020

   Symptoms

   At 18:27 on 21 September 2020 the Cloud Platform team detected that some services running on the live-1 production cluster had gone down, and some users could not reach them. The incident was declared at 18:40.

   Service outageResources deletedMonitoring outageStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   A script for deleting a test cluster was triggered while the kube context was pointing at the live-1 production cluster instead of the test cluster.

   Root cause

   Operator error

   Component

   Ingress controllerCredential broker for podsexternal-dnsCloud load balancerPrometheus

   Contributing factor

   No safeguard on destructive change

   Detection

   The first detection was at 18:27, and the incident was declared 13 minutes later, at 18:40.

   Remediation

   • restored the default ingress controller together with external-dns and kiam, which it depends on
   • corrected the owner field in the Formbuilder Route 53 TXT records so external-dns pointed their A records at the new NLB
   • restored the remaining components with a targeted apply
   • ran the apply pipeline to restore all certificates, ServiceMonitors and Prometheus rules from the environment repository

   View case
5. IL-0199 A non-essential container exceeding its memory limit made GitHub's production pods unavailable, and their restarts failed because a DNS maintenance change had left the clusters unable to reach the image registry

   GitHub2020

   Symptoms

   At 08:18 UTC on 13 July 2020, production Kubernetes pods began to be marked unavailable. The loss of pods spread through the clusters and reduced capacity until GitHub.com services went down.

   OOMKilledImage pull failuresService outage

   Trigger

   A container in the production pods exceeded its memory limit and was terminated; a routine DNS maintenance operation completed earlier had left the clusters unable to reach the image registry.

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   Container memory limitContainer registry and its credentials

   Contributing factor

   Overlapping failuresHarmful manual actionSingle point of failure

   Remediation

   • restarted the process with the cached DNS records so the clusters could reach the registry
   • fetched the container images, redeployed and recovered the services

   Action items

   • Improve monitoring so pod restarts cannot fail again in the same pattern
   • Minimise the dependency on the image registry
   • Expand validation during DNS changes
   • Re-evaluate all existing Kubernetes deployment policies
   • Improve progressive deployments so the impact of a deployment can be evaluated incrementally

   Lessons

   A container that production traffic does not need can still take pods out of service, because a pod is available only when all of its containers are healthy. ImagePullPolicy Always turns every container restart into a registry dependency, so an unrelated DNS change that breaks registry access turns a one-minute self-healing event into a long outage, and a mass redeploy spreads it.

   View case

By root cause11