Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentBGP routingSymptomService outageClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases7 cases

1 to 5 of 7

  1. Symptoms

    On 3 March 2026, during a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch in a cluster in IONOS Cloud's TXL data center, monitoring alerts fired and the hosts in that cluster lost network connectivity. Customers saw intermittent network degradation or outages, and the Data Center Designer (DCD) web frontend and the AI Model Hub became unreachable.

    Trigger

    During a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch, Topology 2 of 2 in the affected cluster was disabled as planned, and a link flap on a switch in Topology 1 then flooded the InfiniBand control plane with alerts and started a fabric resweep.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    IONOS began investigating monitoring alerts in TXL; the first status update was posted at 11:36 UTC.

    Remediation
    • Switched from the affected control plane to its standby
    • Rebooted the locked-up gateways
    • Recovered Topology 1 from the scheduled maintenance
    • Paused provisioning in the cluster that had a backlog of queued jobs
    • Re-enabled provisioning once network connectivity improved and watched job execution
    • Re-established connectivity for the systems that support the DCD
    Action items
    • Adjusted the control-plane configuration to use less aggressive failover timers and reduced heavy sweep activity, lowering the load on the forwarding table
    • Reduced the number of multicast group memberships to relieve the forwarding table
    • Set up continuous monitoring of forwarding table use and control-plane memory with alerts before capacity limits are reached
    • Move the control plane to dedicated high-performance servers, separate from data-plane traffic
    • Audit IPv6 configurations and IPoIB driver settings
    • Modernise the interconnect fabric, including switches, gateways and drivers
    • Hardened IAM maintenance protocols so that critical identity services keep working when the primary Cloud APIs are temporarily unavailable
    • Move IAM to a dedicated platform without a dependency on the standard managed Kubernetes clusters
    • Introduce a dedicated provisioning provider for DBaaS and Managed Kubernetes
    • Add automated circuit breakers to the provisioning engine against overload and queue buildup from self-healing services
    • Improve visibility and control over job execution and prioritisation in the provisioning queue
    • Change the provisioning queue architecture to decouple services and reduce spillover
    Lessons

    IONOS identified the linking of services through the shared provisioning queue as a key reason the degradation lasted as long as it did. Alongside making each service more robust, it is decoupling the provisioning queue and addressing dependencies between services to reduce the blast radius of future incidents.

  2. Symptoms

    At about 16:38 UTC on 17 March 2025, internal alerts fired across multiple Linode data centers because various servers had been unreachable for an extended period. At the same time customers began reporting problems with several products.

    Trigger

    A release of Akamai Compute's internal backend API component was rolling out, and during the rollout the API gave inconsistent responses to the route servers.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Internal alerts fired across multiple data centers showing servers unreachable for an extended period, and customers reported problems with multiple products at the same time.

    Remediation
    • Restarted the route servers in all data centers in phases, starting with the most affected regions
    Action items
    • Hold backend API releases until there is a better way to make sure route data for route servers is contiguous
  3. Symptoms

    At about 06:00 UTC on 10 January 2024, SourceHut's monitoring raised the alarm as a layer 3 DDoS attack hit its infrastructure in the PHL datacenter, and at about 09:00 UTC SourceHut lost all access to its PHL network. PHL was the primary datacenter, and the network became unreachable for SourceHut staff and the general public alike.

    Trigger

    A layer 3 DDoS attack against SourceHut's PHL infrastructure that began at about 06:00 UTC on 10 January 2024 and broadened to more of the PHL subnet on 11 January.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    SourceHut's monitoring systems noticed that something was wrong and raised the alarm from about 06:00 UTC on 10 January.

    Remediation
    • Got Cogent, through the colocation provider, to narrow the null route from the /24 to the targeted /32, which mostly restored service on 10 January
    • Moved DNS to an external DNS provider
    • Brought up a new primary database in AMS
    • Restored backups from FRE to AMS
    • Applied the difference between production data and the last backups by hand
    • Provisioned a new mail system and configured the mail services for it
    • Set up an OVH box that NATs traffic through OVH's DDoS-resistant network to the production subnet in AMS
    • Used a temporary subnet from the PHL network provider for out-of-band access to the PHL servers
    • Served pages.sr.ht through an out-of-band link to PHL while its object storage was migrated
    • Emailed pages.sr.ht users whose apex records pointed at the PHL subnet with instructions
    • Ran build workers on dedicated bare-metal OVH servers
    Action items
    • Provision a new standby database
    • Configure backups from AMS to FRE
    • Install a new monitoring system
    • Retire the PHL datacenter installation and ship its servers to AMS
    • Move build service back onto SourceHut-operated servers once the build servers are shipped from PHL to AMS
    • Research and implement a way to run SourceHut in an on-premise Kubernetes cluster
    • Plan a second production-ready datacenter to load balance against, able to take over full service in a datacenter outage
    Lessons

    The operational plans SourceHut kept for failures up to the loss of a whole datacenter proved important in this incident. The incident exposed a known shortcoming in redundancy and resilience that the team was working on but had not finished, and the response of the upstream network to the attack did more damage than anything else.

  4. Symptoms

    On 25 October 2021 from about 11:16, traffic to the DNS servers in KT's network rose sharply, and then KT's internet service failed across the whole country. KT recognised the internet outage at 11:20, and the outage lasted about 89 minutes until KT finished recovery at about 12:45.

    Trigger

    During the replacement of an enterprise network router at KT's Busan office, worked on remotely from the Busan communication center, a worker entered a routing configuration script that lacked the 'exit' command that should have ended the IS-IS part of the configuration.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    KT recognised the internet outage at 11:20, four minutes after DNS traffic began to surge at 11:16. The Ministry of Science and ICT saw the traffic increase in its own monitoring, and KT reported the outage to the ministry at 11:40.

    Remediation
    • Isolated the router where the faulty routing configuration was entered
    • Logged in to each regional router, deleted the faulty processes and restarted them
    Action items
    • Check the network management of major carriers, including their work procedures and the systems that stop technical errors from spreading
    • Consider having major carriers introduce simulation systems that diagnose errors from network work in advance
    • Have the NMS center and network operations center of each major carrier check technically that approved work plans are followed
    • Strengthen safeguards in routing work, such as limiting the number of route entries updated at once below a set level
    • Strengthen the monitoring of carriers' outages and develop technology, including AI-based preventive diagnosis, for network stability and resilience
    • Prepare structural measures for a stable network architecture and network survivability
    • Let carriers notify users of outages through SNS, text messages and other means, not only the website
    Lessons

    The investigation named management problems and technical problems. On the management side, work approved for the night was done during the day, partner company workers did the routing work without a work manager, and the work was done with the network still connected. On the technical side, the two pre-verification steps were people reading the script and missed the missing 'exit', there was no virtual testbed for trying the work on a disconnected network, and nothing stopped an error in one region from spreading to the whole country.

  5. Symptoms

    At 09:20 CET on 13 October 2021, during a planned change on a router, IPv4 traffic across OVHcloud's whole network stopped being routed, while all IPv6 traffic stayed reachable. The team detected a problem with the router's performance at 09:21 CET and escalated at once.

    Trigger

    A planned change to a router in the Vint Hill datacentre in the United States, meant to strengthen anti-DDoS protection, included a command to regulate the redistribution of BGP into OSPF, and the router did not interpret that command correctly.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    At 09:21 CET the team detected a problem with the router's performance and started the escalation process.

    Remediation
    • Disconnected the optical equipment to isolate the router's connectivity
    • Powered off the faulty router
    • Stabilised connectivity to restore the remaining services
    Action items
    • Re-evaluate the change procedure for this type of equipment, which applies the command line natively
    • Strengthen the related change process
Check your cluster for this

These 7 cases involve BGP routing and Backbone network (WAN). kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause5

Capacity exhaustion1 case

Organisation
  1. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table

Faulty deployment1 case

Contributing factor
Organisation
  1. IL-0563 Linode servers lost connectivity in all data centers as route servers built incomplete BGP route tables
    Linode2025

Dependency failure2 cases

  1. IL-0509 SourceHut was down for 170 hours after a DDoS led its upstream network to null-route the PHL datacenter's subnet
  2. IL-0258 FastMail was unreachable for almost two hours when the GRE tunnels carrying its traffic from Level 3 went down

Configuration change2 cases

Organisation
  1. IL-0539 KT's internet service failed nationwide for about 89 minutes as wrong routes spread from one router in Busan
    KT2021
  2. IL-0228 IPv4 routing across OVHcloud's global network broke after a router change put the full internet routing table into OSPF

Operator error1 case

Organisation
  1. IL-0221 A backbone maintenance command disconnected all Facebook data centers, and its DNS servers withdrew their BGP routes
    Meta2021