Cases10 cases

1 to 5 of 10

1. IL-0354 Fly.io private networking (6PN) broke for some machines after edges received gateway /80 routes

   Fly.io2026

   Symptoms

   On 23 September 2026, private networking (6PN) stopped working for a subset of Fly.io machines. Fly.io mitigated it in about 10 minutes, and the problem came back briefly the following day.

   Network unreachableMisrouted requests

   Trigger

   Fly.io changed its 6PN routing so that edges act as gateways for non-static peers. Every edge was then treated as a gateway and got a /80 route for its prefix in the Linux routing table, which overrode the per-machine routing for machines that had kept a reused host ID.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Host routes and routing rulesNetwork control plane (SDN)

   Contributing factor

   Unverified assumptionGap in automated tests

   Remediation

   • Deleted the bad /80 routes from the routing table on all affected hosts
   • Rolled back the changes to s6pnforwarderd, the daemon that manages 6PN routes
   • Shipped a fix that adds interactive peers only as /128 routes, which did not prevent a brief recurrence the next day
   • Changed routing to always look first for machines that carry a host's ID, whatever kind of host it is

   Action items

   • Give the machines used to test and alert on 6PN non-local 6PN addresses
   • Make host IDs in 6PN addresses carry no weight in routing decisions, for gateway peers as well as machines
   • Move new peers and machines across the board to a better model than the current hack kept for existing gateway peers

   Lessons

   Not everyone at Fly.io knew that a worker's host ID could be reused by a host that is not a worker, because host ID assignment was not well documented, and the gateways had not been touched for a long time, so the problem stayed hidden until edges became gateways. All existing 6PN checks used machines on their original host, so they could not catch any problem with host ID reuse or stable 6PN addresses; host IDs need to stop influencing 6PN routing in general for this kind of incident not to recur.

   View case
2. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 3 March 2026, during a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch in a cluster in IONOS Cloud's TXL data center, monitoring alerts fired and the hosts in that cluster lost network connectivity. Customers saw intermittent network degradation or outages, and the Data Center Designer (DCD) web frontend and the AI Model Hub became unreachable.

   Network unreachableLink flappingService outage

   Trigger

   During a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch, Topology 2 of 2 in the affected cluster was disabled as planned, and a link flap on a switch in Topology 1 then flooded the InfiniBand control plane with alerts and started a fabric resweep.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   InfiniBand fabricNetwork control plane (SDN)BGP routingNIC, cable and switch port linkModel hubDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   IONOS began investigating monitoring alerts in TXL; the first status update was posted at 11:36 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Switched from the affected control plane to its standby
   • Rebooted the locked-up gateways
   • Recovered Topology 1 from the scheduled maintenance
   • Paused provisioning in the cluster that had a backlog of queued jobs
   • Re-enabled provisioning once network connectivity improved and watched job execution
   • Re-established connectivity for the systems that support the DCD

   Action items

   • Adjusted the control-plane configuration to use less aggressive failover timers and reduced heavy sweep activity, lowering the load on the forwarding table
   • Reduced the number of multicast group memberships to relieve the forwarding table
   • Set up continuous monitoring of forwarding table use and control-plane memory with alerts before capacity limits are reached
   • Move the control plane to dedicated high-performance servers, separate from data-plane traffic
   • Audit IPv6 configurations and IPoIB driver settings
   • Modernise the interconnect fabric, including switches, gateways and drivers
   • Hardened IAM maintenance protocols so that critical identity services keep working when the primary Cloud APIs are temporarily unavailable
   • Move IAM to a dedicated platform without a dependency on the standard managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Introduce a dedicated provisioning provider for DBaaS and Managed Kubernetes
   • Add automated circuit breakers to the provisioning engine against overload and queue buildup from self-healing services
   • Improve visibility and control over job execution and prioritisation in the provisioning queue
   • Change the provisioning queue architecture to decouple services and reduce spillover

   Lessons

   IONOS identified the linking of services through the shared provisioning queue as a key reason the degradation lasted as long as it did. Alongside making each service more robust, it is decoupling the provisioning queue and addressing dependencies between services to reduce the blast radius of future incidents.

   View case
3. IL-0563 Linode servers lost connectivity in all data centers as route servers built incomplete BGP route tables

   Linode2025

   Symptoms

   At about 16:38 UTC on 17 March 2025, internal alerts fired across multiple Linode data centers because various servers had been unreachable for an extended period. At the same time customers began reporting problems with several products.

   Network unreachableService outage

   Trigger

   A release of Akamai Compute's internal backend API component was rolling out, and during the rollout the API gave inconsistent responses to the route servers.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   BGP routingNetwork control plane (SDN)

   Contributing factor

   Partial rollout

   Detection

   Internal alerts fired across multiple data centers showing servers unreachable for an extended period, and customers reported problems with multiple products at the same time.

   Remediation

   • Restarted the route servers in all data centers in phases, starting with the most affected regions

   Action items

   • Hold backend API releases until there is a better way to make sure route data for route servers is contiguous

   View case
4. IL-0233 A VPC control plane release broke IP alias routes in Nebius eu-west1, and Managed Kubernetes pods lost connectivity

   Nebius2025

   Symptoms

   On 13 March 2025 practically every pod of Nebius Managed Services for Kubernetes in the eu-west1 region lost network connectivity for at least some time between 13:36 and 18:11 UTC. Packets for the affected IP alias routes were not processed by the data plane. The eu-north1 region was not affected.

   Network unreachable

   Trigger

   A release of a VPC control plane component in eu-west1, deployed to canaries from 13:36 UTC and to all other nodes from 14:35 UTC, changed route distinguisher values for a new feature. The change made a long-standing bug in the handling of route announcements take effect for the update messages of Managed Kubernetes pods.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)BGP routing

   Contributing factor

   Ineffective rollbackGap in automated testsMonitoring blind spot

   Remediation

   • Restarted the host VPC component on the affected nodes one node at a time
   • Restarted the host VPC component on the remaining nodes in parallel once the restart was known to fix the problem

   Action items

   • Fix the bug in the VPC host component itself
   • Add an alert on a diverging number of routes
   • Add an alert on the number of drops in the data plane
   • Develop a way to reset endpoints without restarting the host VPC component
   • Move the VPC's persistent e2e test virtual machines to canary hosts
   • Add persistent e2e tests for Managed Services for Kubernetes
   • Run e2e tests more often
   • Add a deployment stage in which non-critical internal services receive updates first

   Lessons

   The failure needed both an existing IP alias at release time and a particular order of node updates, and neither the testing installation nor the canaries met both, so neither caught it. Missing alerts on technical metrics that deviate from normal, here the number of routes and the number of drops, made the response much slower.

   View case
5. IL-0347 About 25% of Scaleway FR-PAR-1 hypervisors lost VPC connectivity when both VPC BGP route reflectors got stuck

   Scaleway2024

   Symptoms

   On 18 October 2024, from 7:50 to 8:01 UTC, about 25% of the hypervisors in Scaleway's FR-PAR-1 availability zone lost VPC connectivity with the rest of the region, and products that use VPC failed with them. Public internet connectivity and Elastic Metal VPC connectivity were not affected.

   Network unreachablePacket lossNode NotReady

   Trigger

   At 6:20 UTC a Top of Rack switch in FR-PAR-1 had a software crash. One of the two BGP route reflectors for VPC ran on a hypervisor in that rack and was left in an abnormal state.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)BGP routingNetwork switchDatabaseManaged Kubernetes control plane and provider API

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusAutomation amplification

   Detection

   Health-check monitoring on both route reflectors detected the anomaly, and the Scaleway Customer Excellence and SRE teams detected the customer impact and opened an incident.

   Remediation

   • Fixed both VPC route reflectors by manual action

   Action items

   • Fixed the autohealing mechanism that had failed to fix route reflectors stuck in a stale state; the fix is https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/17163
   • Run different software versions on the route reflectors so a single bug cannot stop several instances
   • Investigate the software issue that left the route reflectors in a stale state

   View case

By root cause4