Cases21 cases

1 to 5 of 21

1. IL-0400 Public sector sites across Wales lost connectivity for over 8 hours as a PE router wrongly advertised a default route

   PSBA2026

   Symptoms

   On 25 March 2026 from about 16:40, public sector organisations on the PSBA network across Wales lost connectivity at their sites. The Service Desk saw about 400 alerts at 16:58, when a Major Incident was declared, about 1,500 at 17:05 and about 5,000 across Wales at 17:08, while councils, a fire and rescue service and Natural Resources Wales phoned in to report sites down.

   Network unreachableIntermittent connection failuresLink flapping

   Trigger

   At 16:30 a route map change was applied, outside formal change control, on a PSBA core Provider Edge (PE) router to leak MPLS VPN routes, so that legacy Capita-operated UPS devices in a /16 subnet could be managed by BT/PSBA. The change was removed at 16:40.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   BGP routing

   Contributing factor

   Ineffective rollbackMissed in reviewLimited debug accessOverlapping failures

   Detection

   At 16:57 Mid Wales Fire & Rescue Service phoned in a loss of connectivity at its Presteigne site, and at 16:58 a case was opened in Service Now for a group of about 400 alerts and a Major Incident was declared.

   Remediation

   • Removed the route map change from the PE router at 16:40
   • Changed QoS on the BGP to bring back the management links, after which alarms cleared
   • Cleared routes and reset inbound BGP advertisements, which did not stop the default route being advertised
   • Corrected the configuration issue affecting the internet learned route at 01:02
   • Performed a controlled reload of the affected router at 01:10, which restored customer services and management connectivity

   Action items

   • Reinforce change control requirements with an internal briefing on formal change submission, the risks of unplanned changes and roles during planned and emergency changes
   • Create a dedicated Microsoft Teams channel as the single real-time communication point for all live P1 and Major Incidents
   • Explore disaster recovery and business continuity test exercises for major or P1 incidents
   • During loss of management access, have all technical teams assess customer impact from what reporting organisations provide, captured and shared in real time by the Service Desk and Incident Management
   • Investigate a fixed link between Capital Quarter and the PSBA management racks in Vantage Data Centre at Newport, with dedicated management terminals and two-factor authentication for access outside the secure management platform
   • Improve initial triage with stronger probing questions when incidents are reported and keep reassessing and communicating impact throughout the incident
   • Review the P1 and Major Incident process so escalation criteria and timeframes are clearly defined, and train the Service Desk to recognise and escalate them early
   • Review the PSBA estate for legacy configuration, set processes and timeframes for removing it and add controls so it is not introduced again
   • Review email and SMS distribution lists and processes and reinforce Service Desk training on customer communications during P1 and Major Incidents

   Lessons

   The report names eight lessons: a change was made outside PSBA change control; internal communication during the Major Incident was slow and fragmented; the organisation was not ready for a network-wide incident; losing management access stopped the resolver groups from seeing the network state and customer impact; the resolver groups did not understand customer impact in enough detail, which delayed finding the root cause; escalation to PSBA management was slow; legacy configuration left in the network contributed; and email and SMS communications did not reach some customers in time.

   View case
2. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 3 March 2026, during a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch in a cluster in IONOS Cloud's TXL data center, monitoring alerts fired and the hosts in that cluster lost network connectivity. Customers saw intermittent network degradation or outages, and the Data Center Designer (DCD) web frontend and the AI Model Hub became unreachable.

   Network unreachableLink flappingService outage

   Trigger

   During a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch, Topology 2 of 2 in the affected cluster was disabled as planned, and a link flap on a switch in Topology 1 then flooded the InfiniBand control plane with alerts and started a fabric resweep.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   InfiniBand fabricNetwork control plane (SDN)BGP routingNIC, cable and switch port linkModel hubDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   IONOS began investigating monitoring alerts in TXL; the first status update was posted at 11:36 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Switched from the affected control plane to its standby
   • Rebooted the locked-up gateways
   • Recovered Topology 1 from the scheduled maintenance
   • Paused provisioning in the cluster that had a backlog of queued jobs
   • Re-enabled provisioning once network connectivity improved and watched job execution
   • Re-established connectivity for the systems that support the DCD

   Action items

   • Adjusted the control-plane configuration to use less aggressive failover timers and reduced heavy sweep activity, lowering the load on the forwarding table
   • Reduced the number of multicast group memberships to relieve the forwarding table
   • Set up continuous monitoring of forwarding table use and control-plane memory with alerts before capacity limits are reached
   • Move the control plane to dedicated high-performance servers, separate from data-plane traffic
   • Audit IPv6 configurations and IPoIB driver settings
   • Modernise the interconnect fabric, including switches, gateways and drivers
   • Hardened IAM maintenance protocols so that critical identity services keep working when the primary Cloud APIs are temporarily unavailable
   • Move IAM to a dedicated platform without a dependency on the standard managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Introduce a dedicated provisioning provider for DBaaS and Managed Kubernetes
   • Add automated circuit breakers to the provisioning engine against overload and queue buildup from self-healing services
   • Improve visibility and control over job execution and prioritisation in the provisioning queue
   • Change the provisioning queue architecture to decouple services and reduce spillover

   Lessons

   IONOS identified the linking of services through the shared provisioning queue as a key reason the degradation lasted as long as it did. Alongside making each service more robust, it is decoupling the provisioning queue and addressing dependencies between services to reduce the blast radius of future incidents.

   View case
3. IL-0394 A Cloudflare router in Miami leaked IPv6 BGP routes to peers and providers for 25 minutes, congesting the backbone

   Cloudflare2026

   Symptoms

   On 22 January 2026 from 20:25 UTC, a Cloudflare edge router in Miami sent unintended BGP advertisements of IPv6 prefixes to its transit providers and peers. External networks' traffic was funnelled into the Miami data center, the backbone between Miami and Atlanta became congested, and some Cloudflare customer traffic saw elevated loss and higher latency.

   Packet lossHigh latency

   Trigger

   At 20:25 UTC Cloudflare's policy automation pushed a change, merged at 19:52 UTC, that removed the BGP announcements from Miami for a data center in Bogotá, Colombia, by deleting the prefix-list 6-BOG04-SITE-LOCAL from several export policy terms.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   BGP routingBackbone network (WAN)

   Contributing factor

   No configuration tests

   Detection

   The network team began investigating unintended route advertisements from Miami at 20:40 UTC, and an incident was raised at 20:44 UTC.

   Remediation

   • A network operator reverted the bad configuration change on the Miami router by hand
   • Paused the automation for the router so it could not run again
   • Reverted the triggering change in the network automation code repository
   • Unpaused the automation on the Miami router after confirming it ran without the routing policy bug

   Action items

   • Patch the failure in the routing policy automation that caused the leak
   • Add BGP community-based safeguards that reject routes received from providers and peers on external export policies
   • Add automatic routing policy evaluation to the CI/CD pipelines that looks for empty or erroneous policy terms
   • Detect problems in network configurations and the effects of automated changes earlier
   • Validate routing equipment vendors' implementations of RFC9234 before rolling out BGP roles and the Only-to-Customer Attribute
   • Encourage long-term adoption of RPKI Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA)

   Lessons

   Removing only the prefix lists from export policy terms left terms that were too permissive, because a match on route-type internal accepts IBGP routes as well. Cloudflare states that route leaks are easy to cause by accident and that RFC9234 is the only way, independent of routing policy, to prevent route leaks caused at the local AS.

   View case
4. IL-0564 Linode's Miami, Milan and Sao Paulo data centers had packet loss as traffic moved onto congested alternate paths

   Linode2025

   Symptoms

   Customers using Linode's US-MIA (Miami) and IT-MIL (Milan) data centers saw packet loss and brief performance problems on 14 September 2025 from 17:42 to 18:43 UTC. BR-GRU (Sao Paulo) had the same packet loss on 15 September 2025 from 01:44 to 04:22 UTC.

   Packet loss

   Trigger

   A gradual increase in prefixes pushed the routing between the core router and the edge router past the maximum number of permitted prefixes.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   BGP routingBackbone network (WAN)

   Contributing factor

   –

   Remediation

   • Raised the prefix limit on all the data center routers

   Action items

   • Raise the thresholds of the sessions between Akamai's backbone and the data center ECOR routers
   • Improve the existing alerting and check its severity before limits are reached, with escalation to the right team for immediate action

   View case
5. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours

   Cloudflare2025

   Symptoms

   From 16:27 UTC on 21 August 2025, users connecting to Cloudflare from servers in AWS us-east-1, or receiving connections from Cloudflare there, saw high latency, packet loss and failures to reach origins. Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC.

   Packet lossHigh latencyIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   At about 16:27 UTC a single customer began sending many requests from AWS us-east-1 to Cloudflare for objects in Cloudflare's cache, doubling the total traffic from Cloudflare to AWS.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnectBGP routingCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   No headroomHarmful manual actionExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC, and an incident was raised for customer impact at 17:45 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Rate limited the single customer whose traffic caused the surge
   • Took further traffic engineering actions that fully resolved the congestion
   • Asked AWS to revert its BGP prefix withdrawals, which AWS finished at 20:07 UTC

   Action items

   • Build a mechanism to deprioritise a customer's traffic when it congests the network enough to affect others
   • Speed up the Data Center Interconnect upgrades to add network capacity
   • Work with AWS so the two companies' BGP traffic engineering actions do not conflict
   • Build a traffic management system that gives each customer a network resource budget and automates the manual actions used here

   Lessons

   Cloudflare concludes that it must isolate customers better so that no single customer can take over shared network resources and degrade the platform for others, and that its network needs enough capacity to meet demand. It describes the outage as the result of insufficient network congestion management during an unusual high-traffic event.

   View case

By root cause6