Cases39 cases

4 to 8 of 39

1. IL-0350 Hosts in an IONOS TXL cluster lost connectivity when an InfiniBand fabric resweep failed on a full multicast table

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 3 March 2026, during a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch in a cluster in IONOS Cloud's TXL data center, monitoring alerts fired and the hosts in that cluster lost network connectivity. Customers saw intermittent network degradation or outages, and the Data Center Designer (DCD) web frontend and the AI Model Hub became unreachable.

   Network unreachableLink flappingService outage

   Trigger

   During a scheduled maintenance to replace a faulty switch, Topology 2 of 2 in the affected cluster was disabled as planned, and a link flap on a switch in Topology 1 then flooded the InfiniBand control plane with alerts and started a fabric resweep.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   InfiniBand fabricNetwork control plane (SDN)BGP routingNIC, cable and switch port linkModel hubDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   IONOS began investigating monitoring alerts in TXL; the first status update was posted at 11:36 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Switched from the affected control plane to its standby
   • Rebooted the locked-up gateways
   • Recovered Topology 1 from the scheduled maintenance
   • Paused provisioning in the cluster that had a backlog of queued jobs
   • Re-enabled provisioning once network connectivity improved and watched job execution
   • Re-established connectivity for the systems that support the DCD

   Action items

   • Adjusted the control-plane configuration to use less aggressive failover timers and reduced heavy sweep activity, lowering the load on the forwarding table
   • Reduced the number of multicast group memberships to relieve the forwarding table
   • Set up continuous monitoring of forwarding table use and control-plane memory with alerts before capacity limits are reached
   • Move the control plane to dedicated high-performance servers, separate from data-plane traffic
   • Audit IPv6 configurations and IPoIB driver settings
   • Modernise the interconnect fabric, including switches, gateways and drivers
   • Hardened IAM maintenance protocols so that critical identity services keep working when the primary Cloud APIs are temporarily unavailable
   • Move IAM to a dedicated platform without a dependency on the standard managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Introduce a dedicated provisioning provider for DBaaS and Managed Kubernetes
   • Add automated circuit breakers to the provisioning engine against overload and queue buildup from self-healing services
   • Improve visibility and control over job execution and prioritisation in the provisioning queue
   • Change the provisioning queue architecture to decouple services and reduce spillover

   Lessons

   IONOS identified the linking of services through the shared provisioning queue as a key reason the degradation lasted as long as it did. Alongside making each service more robust, it is decoupling the provisioning queue and addressing dependencies between services to reduce the blast radius of future incidents.

   View case
2. IL-0349 IONOS Private Cloud in Berlin lost management access, storage and VM internet routing after a VLAN change

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 15 January 2026, network services for VMware-based Private Clouds in IONOS Cloud's Berlin location stopped working: customers lost management VPN access and traffic to and from their virtual machines. Inside IONOS, several management interfaces in the Berlin region could no longer be reached.

   Network unreachableStorage disconnected or stale mounts

   Trigger

   During a planned maintenance window to add a new VLAN to the management devices, a human error in the command replaced the existing VLANs on the trunk between the core and management devices instead of adding to them, so only the new VLAN stayed active.

   Root cause

   Operator error

   Component

   Network switchTransit gateway or network interconnect

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo safeguard on destructive change

   Remediation

   • Restarted the affected storage services in the final stage of recovery, which caused a brief second outage

   Action items

   • Audit the management device architecture to segment it better (target Q3 2026)
   • Evaluate and implement ways to prevent unintended VLAN changes, such as improved configuration safeguards or automation scripts (target Q1 2026)

   View case
3. IL-0368 PlanetScale's control plane went down and some database branches failed queries during the AWS us-east-1 outage

   PlanetScale2025

   Symptoms

   At 7:13 UTC on 20 October 2025, PlanetScale's continuous tests in production started failing because they could not create new database branches. The service that creates, resizes and configures database branches was unavailable, a near-total control plane outage, while existing database branches kept their capacity and connectivity.

   Service outageScale-up failureNetwork unreachableHigh error rateReplication lagDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   The incident started with a DNS misconfiguration at one of PlanetScale's service providers. An Amazon DynamoDB outage impacted AWS STS, and several hours of capacity constraints and network instability in AWS us-east-1 followed.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   DatabaseDatabase replicationDatabase proxy and connection poolerObject storage

   Contributing factor

   –

   Detection

   PlanetScale's continuous testing in production started failing and alerted engineers at 7:13 UTC. At 10:05 UTC an alert fired for a Kubernetes operator in a large single-tenant customer installation exhausting its resources.

   Remediation

   • Disallowed new databases in us-east-1 and made us-east-2 the default region for new databases
   • Delayed new backups and cancelled pending backups that were waiting for an EC2 instance
   • Advised PlanetScale Managed customers with vtgate autoscaling to shed load
   • Paused draining and terminating EC2 instances older than 30 days
   • Kept vacant EC2 instances for reuse instead of terminating them
   • Bin-packed vtgate processes more tightly for customers with autoscaling
   • Sent manual reparent requests to move primaries to healthier availability zones
   • Restarted the edge load balancer and vtgate processes that did not recover after the partitions healed

   Action items

   • Understand and become resilient to the failure modes of SaaS dependencies for CI/CD, SSO, web application hosting and incident communication
   • Investigate more ambitious ways to reduce runtime dependence on internal and AWS services
   • Look into using all six us-east-1 availability zones to tolerate zonal outages and partitions

   Lessons

   Keeping the control plane separate from the data plane meant the control plane outage did not affect customer databases, and redundancy, automated failover and zonal traffic routing limited the effect of the network partitions. Network partitions are hard to reason about, test and tolerate: with three availability zones a system survives losing one zone only if the other two can still reach each other reliably.

   View case
4. IL-0227 Most Heroku dynos in Private Spaces lost outbound connectivity after an automated OS update restarted host networking

   Heroku2025

   Symptoms

   From 06:00 UTC on 10 June 2025, Heroku services degraded badly: customers reported intermittent logins, applications failed, and Heroku's monitoring detected widespread errors with dyno networking. Heroku's own tools and the Heroku Status Page were affected as well, which delayed communication with customers and left many of them without accurate status updates. Only at 13:58 UTC did the team find a workaround to post updates to the @herokustatus account on X.

   Network unreachableService outageHigh error rate

   Trigger

   An automated operating system update ran on Heroku's production infrastructure when it should have been disabled, and it restarted the hosts' networking services.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Host routes and routing rules

   Contributing factor

   Unpinned versionCircular dependencyLimited debug access

   Detection

   Customers reported intermittent logins, and Heroku's monitoring detected widespread errors with dyno networking. Heroku's own tools and the Heroku Status Page were affected as well.

   Remediation

   • Restarted internal instances in rotation, which gave some relief
   • Had an upstream vendor invalidate the token used for the automated updates
   • Disabled the automated upgrade service
   • Recycled dynos across the whole fleet

   Action items

   • Put permanent controls in place so no system change happens outside the controlled deployment process
   • Audit all base images for similar risks
   • Make network routing survive graceful restarts of the networking service
   • Build fully independent backup communication channels
   • Overhaul incident response tooling, including tools that run queries across the whole fleet
   • Streamline break-glass procedures for rapid access to critical systems
   • Improve monitoring to detect complex issues earlier

   Lessons

   Heroku's post-mortem names three areas: production lacked immutability controls, so an automated process could change it; communication was too slow, made worse by a status page that went down with the platform; and gaps in tooling and process made recovery take longer than it should have.

   View case
5. IL-0563 Linode servers lost connectivity in all data centers as route servers built incomplete BGP route tables

   Linode2025

   Symptoms

   At about 16:38 UTC on 17 March 2025, internal alerts fired across multiple Linode data centers because various servers had been unreachable for an extended period. At the same time customers began reporting problems with several products.

   Network unreachableService outage

   Trigger

   A release of Akamai Compute's internal backend API component was rolling out, and during the rollout the API gave inconsistent responses to the route servers.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   BGP routingNetwork control plane (SDN)

   Contributing factor

   Partial rollout

   Detection

   Internal alerts fired across multiple data centers showing servers unreachable for an extended period, and customers reported problems with multiple products at the same time.

   Remediation

   • Restarted the route servers in all data centers in phases, starting with the most affected regions

   Action items

   • Hold backend API releases until there is a better way to make sure route data for route servers is contiguous

   View case

By root cause10